Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

GulfCoast66

(11,949 posts)
25. But here is the rub. I doubt you and I are in agreement on several of the issues you state
Mon May 8, 2017, 04:49 PM
May 2017

Last edited Mon May 8, 2017, 05:31 PM - Edit history (1)

Health care. I agree we all have a right to healthcare, not just access to it, but there is more than one way to skin a cat and I would support a system that leaves the hospitals and health system governed by the private sector. Perhaps even employer paid for a large part of the country.

Gun Control. I believe in common sense gun laws, but I also believe that the 2nd does provide individuals with a right to own a modern firearm.

Drilling. Case dependent for me. Not totally opposed.

Pipelines. Same answer as above.

Clean energy. I would guess we are in totally agreement here and I might be more radical. I live in Florida and if I were King of Florida no building over 1,500 square feet could get a building permit without solar panels. Which you might find too radical!

Nor wars for profit and resources. Would need to parse it out. Obviously things like Iraq are total cluster fucks that would result in prison. But no wars for resources? Would you be willing to go to war to protect global sea lanes. Like if Iran cut off the strait of Hormuz or China the South China Sea? Conditionally, I would. Only after every single diplomatic too in the book had been tried.

I support Trade Agreements and think that at the end of the day we(the nation, not just Democrats) will regret abandoning TTP. That has been the Democratic Party position forever. I mean back to FDR's days. Not Clintons.

Money in politics...I just have no answers considering the supreme court. But I know we have to fight on the battlefield we find.


I also notice issue that did not make your list. Racial healing and making up for 450 year of oppression. A woman's right to totally own her own body with no interference. Ending repression of the LGBT community. Now, I am not casting doubt on your support of these causes, just that they did not make your list. The one listing what you want. Not what we necessarily want.

My point is that if some progressives insist that the party support the causes you want without a willingness to compromise with other people on the left who have different priorities then we will never win another election.

The fact that we refer to ourselves in different terms is telling. I do not call myself a progressive. But a liberal. Or sometimes when talking to right winger I do call my self a social Democrat because the word social is close to socialist and that always makes them turn of their front brain, argue like a reptile and I win!

Have a nice evening.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Because we can't agree on which issues are most important... Orsino May 2017 #1
This zipplewrath May 2017 #3
I had a friend defending all the Russian leaks when I asked if he felt screwed over by spreading bettyellen May 2017 #2
Republicans... Snackshack May 2017 #54
he hates republicans but rarely talks about that. He's pretty lefty and bettyellen May 2017 #69
Yikes... Snackshack May 2017 #76
We're still friends but both his wife and I worry about his endless spewing of conspiracy theories.. bettyellen May 2017 #77
I wonder if your friend has kids SticksnStones May 2017 #63
there was some serious CDS going on- he couldnt stop talking about Bill instead of our candidate. bettyellen May 2017 #78
The problem is that wealthy donors rainy May 2017 #4
Guess I must have missed all that in Hillary's platform Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin May 2017 #5
Saying you stand for something rainy May 2017 #13
I guess you must have some fantastic insight that the rest of us don't Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin May 2017 #15
Being on a democratic board rainy May 2017 #20
We say Yes to Getting Good Democratic Leaders Elected.. We say Cha May 2017 #46
So you don't support the Democratic party brer cat May 2017 #65
IMO, your "donors" post bashed the entire party, including me, Hortensis May 2017 #67
There's no "insight".. just pushing 3rd party LIAR stein and sarandon Cha May 2017 #45
Post removed Post removed May 2017 #44
You calling Hillary and our Democratic Leaders Liars? Cha May 2017 #50
But here is the rub. I doubt you and I are in agreement on several of the issues you state GulfCoast66 May 2017 #25
I appreciate everything you said and thank you for having a legitimate discussion about the issues. rainy May 2017 #29
We're cool and I get where you are coming from GulfCoast66 May 2017 #31
You are awesome!!thanks😊 rainy May 2017 #36
Trump came up with a radical agenda. Notice how much trouble he is having? delisen May 2017 #38
It's not that all corporations are bad rainy May 2017 #42
Mahalo for your Reality Based post, delisen.. Cha May 2017 #51
BULL.. as 3rd party Liar Elitist sarandon sits on her $50 Million Bucks Cha May 2017 #43
You should do some research on the FEC regulations. "Wealthy donors" and corporations... George II May 2017 #52
ALEC research it. While you are rainy May 2017 #60
It's not that democrats don't want to rainy May 2017 #61
So big corporations can't donate millions? rainy May 2017 #71
Not to candidates. They can't donate a penny to candidates. George II May 2017 #73
Seems they can and do all the time. rainy May 2017 #74
No they can't and no they don't. That is a clear violation of Federal Law..... George II May 2017 #75
Because it looks like the alt left wants their versions of reality to be about R B Garr May 2017 #6
Post removed Post removed May 2017 #7
We should have a base line ... because some are willing to budge on issue A and B but not C & D etc uponit7771 May 2017 #8
No we shouldn't. You can't have purity test and have any chance of winning. Demsrule86 May 2017 #59
we agree we can't have purity test uponit7771 May 2017 #62
I always have...I voted for Tim Ryan in Ohio when he was anti-choice. Demsrule86 May 2017 #79
We either get this or we will get beat again and again. Jakes Progress May 2017 #9
Easy answer: We don't have anything in common anymore. Initech May 2017 #10
Money out of politics should unite rainy May 2017 #70
And we have to stop Trump from taking away the Johnson Amendment. Initech May 2017 #72
Cults of personality more important than doing the right thing. Iggo May 2017 #11
Don't forget the hardcore Hillary dead enders in 2009. They picked up their marbles Warpy May 2017 #12
Such as? Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin May 2017 #16
You should know better than that Warpy May 2017 #32
+1 KTM May 2017 #33
So they weren't Democrats in the first place Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin May 2017 #37
Posts that begin with "so" are invariably straw men and your is definitely that Warpy May 2017 #40
No Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin May 2017 #41
You're Projecting A-gain. Cha May 2017 #47
LOL.. according to that poster.. you start a sentence with "So" and they Cha May 2017 #48
it's the same old issue librechik May 2017 #14
Bernies ...... income equality thingy is NOT the only thing i care about !!! trueblue2007 May 2017 #17
infact being a woman, i can think of some things that pertain to me trueblue2007 May 2017 #18
I don't think we can have real social justice without economic justice mvd May 2017 #19
They are linked. Carrying about income inequality and gay and women's rights are in no way mutually Jno_Gilmor_ May 2017 #21
Well said! mvd May 2017 #22
Thanks! Jno_Gilmor_ May 2017 #23
A couple of points: Nevernose May 2017 #24
"Sanders got the under-30 PoC vote by a huge 75% or so." NCTraveler May 2017 #27
Going totally by memory Nevernose May 2017 #34
"And that's the honest truth." NCTraveler May 2017 #35
Well said, Nevernose. n/t ms liberty May 2017 #28
The debate for the most part is about the use of our resources.... NCTraveler May 2017 #26
Ok there are two kinds of political folks. JNelson6563 May 2017 #30
Yes I've noticed that too Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin May 2017 #39
I was actually at the state convention Nevernose May 2017 #49
The stuff the 'talkers' want and expect of the Party will never happen and would Demsrule86 May 2017 #57
There is battle between the... nycbos May 2017 #53
Because too many don't know what solidarity means. longship May 2017 #55
Read it. Seems like Kos has his head pretty far up his own ass. redgreenandblue May 2017 #56
Not all of Sen. Sander's supporter are white males...but I think there is a push Demsrule86 May 2017 #58
because their are Russian trolls and far left West "haters" who want to sow division still around snooper2 May 2017 #64
A lot less whitemalesplainin' would go a long way to healing divisions. brer cat May 2017 #66
Exactly. Thank you, brer cat NastyRiffraff May 2017 #68
The word identity politics annoys me when I hear the right use the term... Demsrule86 May 2017 #80
I never thought I'd see people calling themselves "Democrats" or "progressives".. JHan May 2017 #81
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»If we agree on the issues...»Reply #25