Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

MineralMan

(150,998 posts)

2. The language is amply vague.

Reply to Stallion (Reply #1)

Wed May 10, 2017, 09:17 AM

May 2017

There appears to be evidence that they were, indeed, parties to actions that affected the 2016 elections and influenced the Republican Party Platform with regard to Russia.

But, we do not have an administration that would take any such action, so the question is moot, really.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

3 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

SCOTUS Original Jurisdiction [View all] MineralMan May 2017 OP

I Think That Would Require Them to Be Formal Parties in the Controversy Stallion May 2017 #1

The language is amply vague. MineralMan May 2017 #2

It's not vague a all. rsdsharp May 2017 #3