Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

(69,109 posts)

6. That wouldn't be necessary with Burr.

Wed May 10, 2017, 11:39 AM

May 2017

He's one of my senators, and he's as corrupt as they come.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

20 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Senator Burr (R- NC) had a pleasant little conversation with the President... [View all] kentuck May 2017 OP

Three guesses... 2naSalit May 2017 #1

Is it too extreme and paranoid to consider whether The Velveteen Ocelot May 2017 #2

That wouldn't be necessary with Burr. yardwork May 2017 #6

I wouldn't be surprised if that was discussed regarding Comey BannonsLiver May 2017 #13

it's called interfering with a senate investigation. spanone May 2017 #3

+1000 Freethinker65 May 2017 #5

A good point! kentuck May 2017 #11

+100 kentuck May 2017 #17

i have great confidence that john mccain will come around. spanone May 2017 #9

I wish I did, but I don't. cos dem May 2017 #14

you mis-read my post, but i think we're on the same page spanone May 2017 #15

Ah, i get it. Sarcasm ain't always easy on intertubes. cos dem May 2017 #18

sorry bout that. spanone May 2017 #19

But but but Trump is not being investigated. Thinkingabout May 2017 #7

Burr should have declined because of the appearance of impropriety. Snotcicles May 2017 #8

Also, wasn't he recruited by Trump to sell his story to the press? kentuck May 2017 #12

I think Graham put out a really wimpy pro-Trump letter yesterday. awesomerwb May 2017 #20