Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

socialist_n_TN

(11,481 posts)
14. They could and probably would TRY to chalk it up.........
Thu May 11, 2017, 08:45 AM
May 2017

to professional agitators and George Soros "employees" , but a true GS that disrupted the economy in a significant way would mean it would be hard to sustain and maintain that attitude.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

I am so in! Chasstev365 May 2017 #1
If it was economic. If consumers stopped spending money, the underthematrix May 2017 #2
No JustAnotherGen May 2017 #3
Beat Me To It! ProfessorGAC May 2017 #7
They could and probably would TRY to chalk it up......... socialist_n_TN May 2017 #14
Then We Disagree A Bit ProfessorGAC May 2017 #17
Well, if it doesn't disrupt the economy in a significant way........ socialist_n_TN May 2017 #19
Back To Agreeing! ProfessorGAC May 2017 #21
Well the Brazilian GS in late April is analogous to what it would take......... socialist_n_TN May 2017 #23
Been There ProfessorGAC May 2017 #25
A general strike is, by its nature,........... socialist_n_TN May 2017 #12
We are too diverse in America - even by region JustAnotherGen May 2017 #24
We don't have enough men participating in activism so far- the marches, the calls to congress, the bettyellen May 2017 #32
Workers do not have enough Alpeduez21 May 2017 #4
The job security in the immediate term comes from......... socialist_n_TN May 2017 #15
ya but the shit is hitting the fan like it's 1974 eShirl May 2017 #28
people will not jep there jobs dembotoz May 2017 #33
It works in other places because their social safety nets aren't tethered to employment. HughBeaumont May 2017 #5
Nope. Because they've already come to their senses about where the money comes from. Bucky May 2017 #6
No since there won't be a national general strike Lurks Often May 2017 #8
Is that because Trump is so popular?.......... socialist_n_TN May 2017 #10
If done correctly, a nationwide general strike is the ONLY thing........... socialist_n_TN May 2017 #9
Pure fantasy... brooklynite May 2017 #11
No mountain is climbable LanternWaste May 2017 #16
Very well then; explain how you'll climb the mountain... brooklynite May 2017 #18
To climb that mountain first you're going to have to have repression...... socialist_n_TN May 2017 #20
A general strike is impossible in the United States. MineralMan May 2017 #13
Here is a report on an actual General Strike...... socialist_n_TN May 2017 #22
I was just thinking that lapfog_1 May 2017 #26
I observed the last one BainsBane May 2017 #27
I wonder if people who call for this kind of thing are just wealthy or or if touch Lee-Lee May 2017 #29
Your point is well taken, but I am neither wealthy but not one pay check away from financial Augiedog May 2017 #35
this is america, we have no national conscience... beachbum bob May 2017 #30
when it runs on NYT or washington (sic) Post let me know... LanternWaste May 2017 #36
If Gingrich and Turkey Neck can shut down the government ... lpbk2713 May 2017 #31
We're too spread out as a nation. A general strike will have to last a week to work... haele May 2017 #34
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Would a national general ...»Reply #14