Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

LaydeeBug

(10,291 posts)
45. some of these tweets seem "off" to me...Can Roberts recuse another justice?
Sat May 13, 2017, 07:47 PM
May 2017

I am not sure he can.

Just about all of them smack of something "off".

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

"High treason"? That's likely to get Cheetolini to pay attention. oasis May 2017 #1
The courts are our only hope at this point. CottonBear May 2017 #2
+100000 CentralMass May 2017 #33
The moment we need to approve a new vice-president nomination, we become a bi-partisan nation. L. Coyote May 2017 #40
You must have a different Constitution FBaggins May 2017 #43
I doubt he knows what "high treason" means. He has to ask an aide what a tblue37 May 2017 #3
Wow!! Blue_Roses May 2017 #4
I'm thinking it's not a coinkydink rainbow4321 May 2017 #7
Why would the CIA be involved......... SergeStorms May 2017 #5
If foreign intel Blue_Roses May 2017 #13
"Recusal" is something done voluntarily. Roberts couldn't have recused Gorsuch. Demit May 2017 #6
Yeah - that jumped out at me too. Kber May 2017 #22
leaks are coming out... SledDriver May 2017 #27
It wouldn't surprise me, either. Volaris May 2017 #48
This is such bullshit onenote May 2017 #8
Thanks for clarifying the situation OldRedneck May 2017 #10
At this point so many people are just making stuff up Lee-Lee May 2017 #9
yup Ligyron May 2017 #11
If alot of intel Blue_Roses May 2017 #12
Nope FBaggins May 2017 #15
First of all, let me be clear Blue_Roses May 2017 #18
Well your "friend" Lee-Lee May 2017 #19
Um, okay Blue_Roses May 2017 #21
C'mon, you can't very well come on a board where you are anonymous, Demit May 2017 #26
This of course is real by brothers uncles cousins hairdresser Lee-Lee May 2017 #29
That is not what I said Blue_Roses May 2017 #30
You're trying to argue from authority. Worse than that, anonymous authority. Demit May 2017 #35
I'm not trying to "argue" at all Blue_Roses May 2017 #38
"Argument" as in presenting a series of statements meant to lead to a logical conclusion. Demit May 2017 #39
Did this "friend of yours" ever pass a HS civics class? FBaggins May 2017 #32
Damn Blue_Roses May 2017 #34
No, they wouldn't Lee-Lee May 2017 #17
Okay Blue_Roses May 2017 #20
I am not talking about Blue_Roses May 2017 #23
And your still wrong Lee-Lee May 2017 #28
Okay, Blue_Roses May 2017 #31
These are just idiots throwing around words they heard on "Law and Order" DefenseLawyer May 2017 #14
I see no reson to believe any ofthose tweets about SCOTUS are legitimate. Foamfollower May 2017 #16
Does SCOTUS have FISA appellate authority? sharedvalues May 2017 #24
FISA Appeals onenote May 2017 #25
When in history did the CIA ever brief the SCOTUS on anything? Mr. Ected May 2017 #36
Never, but some here refuse to believe anything that conflicts Lee-Lee May 2017 #37
They have been there all along. They are the final arbiters of the secret FISA court. L. Coyote May 2017 #41
Sorry... that's nonsense. FBaggins May 2017 #42
So, who do you think picks the FISA Court? L. Coyote May 2017 #44
What's interesting is that you think that matters FBaggins May 2017 #46
some of these tweets seem "off" to me...Can Roberts recuse another justice? LaydeeBug May 2017 #45
Of course he can't FBaggins May 2017 #47
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Has the Supreme Court ste...»Reply #45