General Discussion

Lee-Lee

(6,324 posts)

25. That's the most obviously staged public "conversation" I've seen in a while

Sun May 14, 2017, 06:33 AM

May 2017

No lawyer, anywhere, is going to make statements like that to a client on a public space like Twitter. Not if the client has 2 followers and certainly not if she has millions and everything she posts gets screenshotted and spread everywhere.

Not going to happen.

This is so clearly a staged "conversation" intended to spur discussion or give some sort of cover or make her appear edgy or something.

Anyone who believes this is a real exchange is a bigger fool than any attorney who would publicly tell a client what they are doing is risky.

She has been close to jumping the shark for me for a long while, but seeing this obviously fake exchange has done it for me.

Click here to purchase valentine hearts!

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

63 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

A lawyer for Louise Mensch seems worried that her latest "bombshell" is bullshit. [View all] jberryhill May 2017 OP

Understandable, this is the biggest story in years if true. If false Quixote1818 May 2017 #1

Yup n/t renegade000 May 2017 #19

Same Grand Jury issued subpoenas for Flynn associates hours before Comey was fired. L. Coyote May 2017 #49

The higher their credibility rises, the more likely Eyeball_Kid May 2017 #51

I find it hard to believe they have an indictment against Trump this early in the investigation. hrmjustin May 2017 #2

Early? They have been investigating this for over a year. nt Quixote1818 May 2017 #7

Yeah, but... hvn_nbr_2 May 2017 #16

Because there are many more pieces to the puzzle. Often they start with the charges that pnwmom May 2017 #18

I would take it with a grain of salt. welivetotreadonkings May 2017 #3

This is the thing I find fascinating jberryhill May 2017 #4

Pretty much like you've just done. OilemFirchen May 2017 #9

I don't know jack about Mensch or her lawyer jberryhill May 2017 #11

And what of the other question? OilemFirchen May 2017 #13

No I don't think they are actionable jberryhill May 2017 #14

Then he's not "worried that her latest 'bombshell' is bullshit". OilemFirchen May 2017 #15

Libel? bathroommonkey76 May 2017 #20

It is easy to demonize truthtellers. AngryAmish May 2017 #33

Not sure "questionable" is the right word. The sources have a good track records Quixote1818 May 2017 #12

Is there a set of numbers on that track record? jberryhill May 2017 #47

would you please stop.. chillfactor May 2017 #5

Really, in what way? jberryhill May 2017 #6

You are not negative you are a "concern troll" - LOL LeftInTX May 2017 #8

Ah, good, I already earned by "comrade" badge tonight jberryhill May 2017 #10

In addition BeyondGeography May 2017 #22

Well for one thing... Orrex May 2017 #24

Thanks for that. Nt moriah May 2017 #31

Because I was positive I had already eaten it jberryhill May 2017 #34

How about asking yourself leftynyc May 2017 #60

Doubtful. I'm negative... moriah May 2017 #32

If you want positive results, you should see Trump's doctor jberryhill May 2017 #46

Facts truthaddict247 May 2017 #17

Crazy! Right out in the open! elias7 May 2017 #21

Why is her lawyer talking to her via Twitter? oberliner May 2017 #23

Because it's fake as hell Lee-Lee May 2017 #26

My thoughts exactly oberliner May 2017 #28

I should have read the comments leftynyc May 2017 #61

That's the most obviously staged public "conversation" I've seen in a while Lee-Lee May 2017 #25

That's a fair point. Denzil_DC May 2017 #27

There is a world of difference between sources and your legal counsel Lee-Lee May 2017 #29

Well, one attorney just did. Denzil_DC May 2017 #30

He's just interacting as a twitter friend Loki Liesmith May 2017 #35

Here's something lawyers are taught for the multi state ethics exam jberryhill May 2017 #38

All I can tell you is that I know Louise and Loki Liesmith May 2017 #40

Well, if you know Mensch, you'll know that she describes herself as having ADHD Denzil_DC May 2017 #41

Yes we've discussed her ADHD and my Asperger's Loki Liesmith May 2017 #42

That's why I described Mensch Denzil_DC May 2017 #45

But Jester is someone we should believe is exactly who he says he is? SticksnStones May 2017 #54

I've followed The Jester on social media for a long time, way before most here had heard of him. Denzil_DC May 2017 #62

Wasn't railing...I would have chosen stronger words if I was railing SticksnStones May 2017 #63

lol This is all bizarre and funny. Oneironaut May 2017 #39

And you just jumped the shark Charlotte Little May 2017 #52

To be fair jberryhill May 2017 #48

It's bull crap. I wish people would stop believing this hack. Oneironaut May 2017 #36

The proverbial Time will tell, no? It's not like LM is disputing some point in the ancient past that WinkyDink May 2017 #37

Well I guess the jury is still out on her claim that Russians were funding BLM protests in Ferguson jberryhill May 2017 #53

That's out of context SticksnStones May 2017 #55

Pull my other leg, it's got bells on it jberryhill May 2017 #56

Well there's also a Snopes page for Obama's SticksnStones May 2017 #57

So all of the paid instigators got away jberryhill May 2017 #58

Can I verify? No. Plausible? Yes. SticksnStones May 2017 #59

The lawyer is telling her to be careful and she is telling him she understands. Madam45for2923 May 2017 #43

This has been a very busy weekend for the #TrumpTrollArmy, lots of overtime in Moscow. L. Coyote May 2017 #44

Thatcherite bullshit artist says what? WoonTars May 2017 #50