Taylor and Mensch now report, based on separate sources, a sealed indictment against DT.

[jberryhill]

111. Did I say there were no sealed indictments anywhere?

Sure, there may be.

But since that is not a claim subject to critical analysis, then all we got is a strong indication that these people don't know what they are talking about.

The "Supremacy Clause" thing is not a "layman's error" because it is so far from relevant that it is not even "wrong". The underlying premise - that a sitting president cannot be criminally prosecuted - is not a settled question, so for a layman to say so in an "of course this is impossible" tone, is not a matter of some error in word selection. The premise is not even correct, and the bizarre reason for it is simply bizarre.



But if the sealed indictment is filed next to Obama's "real" birth certificate, then it doesn't help.

There are, out in the open, horrendous things this cretin has done, about which there are still idiots who do not quite grasp the enormity of the situation we are in.