General Discussion

L. Coyote

(51,134 posts)

23. Don't peddle right-wing talking points, smears, or sources

Reply to Foamfollower (Reply #13)

Sun May 14, 2017, 03:16 PM

May 2017

Don't bash Dem public figures either.

And enjoy your stay.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

111 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Claude Taylor has issued a clarification. [View all] Qutzupalotl May 2017 OP

Trump indictment? is that what it says? Eliot Rosewater May 2017 #1

Yes. Louise Mensch's sources are different and saying practically the same thing: Qutzupalotl May 2017 #2

Not sure about her but this would be great news, what worries me is Eliot Rosewater May 2017 #3

She says elsewhere that Pence and Ryan are also implicated Qutzupalotl May 2017 #6

I don't know the validity of this or even the procedural path it would follow to have so many in Dustlawyer May 2017 #16

Solid bullshit in that blog post: jberryhill May 2017 #12

People will pressure GOP to impeach I hope womanofthehills May 2017 #88

He has immunity for acts done in his official capacity jberryhill May 2017 #89

2/3rds correct H2O Man May 2017 #4

Thank you. Qutzupalotl May 2017 #5

A couple of associates. H2O Man May 2017 #7

Appreciate the input. If you have a twitter account Qutzupalotl May 2017 #94

Thanks. H2O Man May 2017 #103

that sounds believable Ligyron May 2017 #81

Last week, on MSNBC's H2O Man May 2017 #104

SKEPTICISM CONCERNING THESE UNVERIFIED CLAIMS bresue May 2017 #8

Leaking so Investigation cannot be stopped. Madam45for2923 May 2017 #10

100% agree Charlotte Little May 2017 #15

Fast bucolic_frolic May 2017 #28

Steel their loins? LOL. Nitram May 2017 #44

one is a synonym for the other bucolic_frolic May 2017 #76

Nope. Two different expressions. Not interchangeable. You can't steel your loins. Nitram May 2017 #108

nitram is correct. The expressions are related but have different meanings. Bernardo de La Paz May 2017 #109

Nitpicking phrases vs words bucolic_frolic May 2017 #110

Nope. You misunderstand the figurative meaning of "steel" in this context. Nitram May 2017 #111

where have they been right? Demonaut May 2017 #87

Where have they been right? Charlotte Little May 2017 #93

Louise & Claude ... LenaBaby61 May 2017 #100

Grand Jury leaks can annul the process, actually. L. Coyote May 2017 #22

In yesterday's discussion, someone here said indictments against drumpf would stay sealed The Blue Flower May 2017 #9

I think timing is important because cannot have Trump around to pardon people Madam45for2923 May 2017 #11

The lying liar is backpedaling to cover his ass. Foamfollower May 2017 #13

??? Madam45for2923 May 2017 #17

He's spouting made up bullshit. Foamfollower May 2017 #19

I think you can criticize someone without being extreme about it especially a DEM who is on our side Madam45for2923 May 2017 #20

Some info for you, or not, as the case may be Bernardo de La Paz May 2017 #25

I've visited every link you posted. Foamfollower May 2017 #31

That all you have to say and you never back it up. . . nt Bernardo de La Paz May 2017 #34

You demand proof of a negative. Foamfollower May 2017 #35

Nope. You have made two assertions (Mensch, CTaylor) that you are unable to back up. Bernardo de La Paz May 2017 #37

Mensch and Taylor are making the assertions. Foamfollower May 2017 #61

They aren't making them here. You are making assertions HERE. You are being called on it. . . . nt Bernardo de La Paz May 2017 #62

And I will continue to call bullshit when their bullshit is posted here Foamfollower May 2017 #63

Repetition of that word makes your (non-existent) case weaker. . . nt Bernardo de La Paz May 2017 #64

Repetition of Mensch and Carter bullshit makes it even bullshittier Foamfollower May 2017 #67

No truthaddict247 May 2017 #59

+1. Well stated. . . nt Bernardo de La Paz May 2017 #66

What CT? Is Trump/Russia collusion a CT? or Hokum? as you like to say? Madam45for2923 May 2017 #68

Claiming there are "selaled indictments for Donld Trump" is pure hokum. Foamfollower May 2017 #70

Is Trump/Russia collusion hokum? Madam45for2923 May 2017 #71

In my book? Here is the most likely scenario... Foamfollower May 2017 #74

You have a lot of faith in Trump as an innocent naif Qutzupalotl May 2017 #96

You have an interesting way of inventing things I allegedly say out of whole cloth. Foamfollower May 2017 #97

You bent over backwards to say you believe Trump has no knowledge Qutzupalotl May 2017 #98

And again, you invent shit out of whole cloth. Foamfollower May 2017 #99

You think people would commit treason on Trump's behalf Qutzupalotl May 2017 #101

Maybe you should educate yourself on past scandals, especially Watergate. Foamfollower May 2017 #102

There's only one Capo in this WH, and it's Mafia Don. Qutzupalotl May 2017 #105

He's a fucking moron. Foamfollower May 2017 #106

If only we were more emphatic about the lies emanating from the Trumpy WH... Eyeball_Kid May 2017 #27

OF course Trump is lying all the time. Foamfollower May 2017 #36

You never supply any evidence about Taylor and Mensch, even when asked. You have nothing. nt Bernardo de La Paz May 2017 #38

None of it is true. Foamfollower May 2017 #40

You wish. You have nothing to back up what you say. . nt Bernardo de La Paz May 2017 #46

Wrong, Mensch and Carter have nothing to back up what they claim! Foamfollower May 2017 #47

They do. But the ball is in your court. You are the one making the baseless assertion HERE on DU. nt Bernardo de La Paz May 2017 #48

Then present the fucking indictment Foamfollower May 2017 #49

Just because you are impatient does not make sealed indictments bullshit. . . nt Bernardo de La Paz May 2017 #51

Yes, it does, because presidents are never indicted. Foamfollower May 2017 #52

The world does not revolve around you. Your impatience blinds you so you don't see that Manafort and Bernardo de La Paz May 2017 #54

OFFS! Foamfollower May 2017 #55

Repetition of that word does not make it more true. . . . nt Bernardo de La Paz May 2017 #57

Here's what Mensch said. Qutzupalotl May 2017 #75

No, that's not what she said. She claimed he was indicted. Foamfollower May 2017 #77

Can you post a link to that statute Qutzupalotl May 2017 #79

Why not back up what you are saying jberryhill May 2017 #91

Foamfollower I was on the jury that alerted on your first OP reply denbot May 2017 #53

It's fan fiction. BannonsLiver May 2017 #42

Exactly! Foamfollower May 2017 #43

No. You can't point to any lies he's posted. You couldn't when asked about Mensch. Bernardo de La Paz May 2017 #21

Don't peddle right-wing talking points, smears, or sources L. Coyote May 2017 #23

He's making shit up! Foamfollower May 2017 #32

It is laughable when the person with no information says "come back when you have information"! . nt Bernardo de La Paz May 2017 #41

Wishes aren't information and all Mensch and Carter are peddling are wishes. Foamfollower May 2017 #50

All you're peddling are ad hominems. Qutzupalotl May 2017 #95

Foamfollower truthaddict247 May 2017 #65

Yes, Donald Trump is always backpedaling to cover his ass. You've got that right. n/t pnwmom May 2017 #30

I'll believe Flynn...and Manafort too. Think Trump is a big dose of Hopium right now. Feathery Scout May 2017 #14

Hopium! calimary May 2017 #18

Yep! I have no doubt he is a traitor. But did he leave proof? And will the Reps allow it to Feathery Scout May 2017 #39

Does anyone mention what the indictments are for? I'm betting that the indictments TheDebbieDee May 2017 #24

There was an FBI raid in Alexandria, Virginia, on Thursday at a Republican fundraising company. . nt Bernardo de La Paz May 2017 #26

Do you mean the raid in Annapolis, MD, Bernardo? Leghorn21 May 2017 #69

Oops, yes, you got it. Thanks for correcting me! . . nt Bernardo de La Paz May 2017 #72

It was about a case from 2013. former9thward May 2017 #73

The owner of the place said that. It's like taking the suspect's word. FBI was mute. Madam45for2923 May 2017 #78

The owner of the place read the search warrant. former9thward May 2017 #80

That was what they knew was there. Qutzupalotl May 2017 #82

Is it public the warrant? Madam45for2923 May 2017 #84

Search warrants specify places & causes (reason). This one probably sealed because of bigger issues Bernardo de La Paz May 2017 #85

If you think a major FBI op that size is about a CIVIL case that was SETTLED, go ahead. Bernardo de La Paz May 2017 #83

Always good to know we have an expert in FBI operations on DU. former9thward May 2017 #90

I'm not. Do you care to debate my points or do you wish to attack me again? Bernardo de La Paz May 2017 #92

I get that he's not an attorney, but presumably his "sources" are. DefenseLawyer May 2017 #29

I'm pretty sure his "sources" are his fevered mind Foamfollower May 2017 #33

+1 BannonsLiver May 2017 #45

+1 Takket May 2017 #56

And I'm pretty sure they're not. GliderGuider May 2017 #58

That's your right. Foamfollower May 2017 #60

+Another 1 LovingA2andMI May 2017 #107

I will keep reading LM and CT and make up my own mind. Thank You very much! Madam45for2923 May 2017 #86