General Discussion

Feathery Scout

(218 posts)

39. Yep! I have no doubt he is a traitor. But did he leave proof? And will the Reps allow it to

Sun May 14, 2017, 03:51 PM

May 2017

be uncovered and exposed to the world, destroying Trump and their Party?

That's a big leap of faith.

Especially when the first step hasn't even been taken yet. Formal acknowledgement that Trump himself is under investigation.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

111 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Claude Taylor has issued a clarification. [View all] Qutzupalotl May 2017 OP

Trump indictment? is that what it says? Eliot Rosewater May 2017 #1

Yes. Louise Mensch's sources are different and saying practically the same thing: Qutzupalotl May 2017 #2

Not sure about her but this would be great news, what worries me is Eliot Rosewater May 2017 #3

She says elsewhere that Pence and Ryan are also implicated Qutzupalotl May 2017 #6

I don't know the validity of this or even the procedural path it would follow to have so many in Dustlawyer May 2017 #16

Solid bullshit in that blog post: jberryhill May 2017 #12

People will pressure GOP to impeach I hope womanofthehills May 2017 #88

He has immunity for acts done in his official capacity jberryhill May 2017 #89

2/3rds correct H2O Man May 2017 #4

Thank you. Qutzupalotl May 2017 #5

A couple of associates. H2O Man May 2017 #7

Appreciate the input. If you have a twitter account Qutzupalotl May 2017 #94

Thanks. H2O Man May 2017 #103

that sounds believable Ligyron May 2017 #81

Last week, on MSNBC's H2O Man May 2017 #104

SKEPTICISM CONCERNING THESE UNVERIFIED CLAIMS bresue May 2017 #8

Leaking so Investigation cannot be stopped. Madam45for2923 May 2017 #10

100% agree Charlotte Little May 2017 #15

Fast bucolic_frolic May 2017 #28

Steel their loins? LOL. Nitram May 2017 #44

one is a synonym for the other bucolic_frolic May 2017 #76

Nope. Two different expressions. Not interchangeable. You can't steel your loins. Nitram May 2017 #108

nitram is correct. The expressions are related but have different meanings. Bernardo de La Paz May 2017 #109

Nitpicking phrases vs words bucolic_frolic May 2017 #110

Nope. You misunderstand the figurative meaning of "steel" in this context. Nitram May 2017 #111

where have they been right? Demonaut May 2017 #87

Where have they been right? Charlotte Little May 2017 #93

Louise & Claude ... LenaBaby61 May 2017 #100

Grand Jury leaks can annul the process, actually. L. Coyote May 2017 #22

In yesterday's discussion, someone here said indictments against drumpf would stay sealed The Blue Flower May 2017 #9

I think timing is important because cannot have Trump around to pardon people Madam45for2923 May 2017 #11

The lying liar is backpedaling to cover his ass. Foamfollower May 2017 #13

??? Madam45for2923 May 2017 #17

He's spouting made up bullshit. Foamfollower May 2017 #19

I think you can criticize someone without being extreme about it especially a DEM who is on our side Madam45for2923 May 2017 #20

Some info for you, or not, as the case may be Bernardo de La Paz May 2017 #25

I've visited every link you posted. Foamfollower May 2017 #31

That all you have to say and you never back it up. . . nt Bernardo de La Paz May 2017 #34

You demand proof of a negative. Foamfollower May 2017 #35

Nope. You have made two assertions (Mensch, CTaylor) that you are unable to back up. Bernardo de La Paz May 2017 #37

Mensch and Taylor are making the assertions. Foamfollower May 2017 #61

They aren't making them here. You are making assertions HERE. You are being called on it. . . . nt Bernardo de La Paz May 2017 #62

And I will continue to call bullshit when their bullshit is posted here Foamfollower May 2017 #63

Repetition of that word makes your (non-existent) case weaker. . . nt Bernardo de La Paz May 2017 #64

Repetition of Mensch and Carter bullshit makes it even bullshittier Foamfollower May 2017 #67

No truthaddict247 May 2017 #59

+1. Well stated. . . nt Bernardo de La Paz May 2017 #66

What CT? Is Trump/Russia collusion a CT? or Hokum? as you like to say? Madam45for2923 May 2017 #68

Claiming there are "selaled indictments for Donld Trump" is pure hokum. Foamfollower May 2017 #70

Is Trump/Russia collusion hokum? Madam45for2923 May 2017 #71

In my book? Here is the most likely scenario... Foamfollower May 2017 #74

You have a lot of faith in Trump as an innocent naif Qutzupalotl May 2017 #96

You have an interesting way of inventing things I allegedly say out of whole cloth. Foamfollower May 2017 #97

You bent over backwards to say you believe Trump has no knowledge Qutzupalotl May 2017 #98

And again, you invent shit out of whole cloth. Foamfollower May 2017 #99

You think people would commit treason on Trump's behalf Qutzupalotl May 2017 #101

Maybe you should educate yourself on past scandals, especially Watergate. Foamfollower May 2017 #102

There's only one Capo in this WH, and it's Mafia Don. Qutzupalotl May 2017 #105

He's a fucking moron. Foamfollower May 2017 #106

If only we were more emphatic about the lies emanating from the Trumpy WH... Eyeball_Kid May 2017 #27

OF course Trump is lying all the time. Foamfollower May 2017 #36

You never supply any evidence about Taylor and Mensch, even when asked. You have nothing. nt Bernardo de La Paz May 2017 #38

None of it is true. Foamfollower May 2017 #40

You wish. You have nothing to back up what you say. . nt Bernardo de La Paz May 2017 #46

Wrong, Mensch and Carter have nothing to back up what they claim! Foamfollower May 2017 #47

They do. But the ball is in your court. You are the one making the baseless assertion HERE on DU. nt Bernardo de La Paz May 2017 #48

Then present the fucking indictment Foamfollower May 2017 #49

Just because you are impatient does not make sealed indictments bullshit. . . nt Bernardo de La Paz May 2017 #51

Yes, it does, because presidents are never indicted. Foamfollower May 2017 #52

The world does not revolve around you. Your impatience blinds you so you don't see that Manafort and Bernardo de La Paz May 2017 #54

OFFS! Foamfollower May 2017 #55

Repetition of that word does not make it more true. . . . nt Bernardo de La Paz May 2017 #57

Here's what Mensch said. Qutzupalotl May 2017 #75

No, that's not what she said. She claimed he was indicted. Foamfollower May 2017 #77

Can you post a link to that statute Qutzupalotl May 2017 #79

Why not back up what you are saying jberryhill May 2017 #91

Foamfollower I was on the jury that alerted on your first OP reply denbot May 2017 #53

It's fan fiction. BannonsLiver May 2017 #42

Exactly! Foamfollower May 2017 #43

No. You can't point to any lies he's posted. You couldn't when asked about Mensch. Bernardo de La Paz May 2017 #21

Don't peddle right-wing talking points, smears, or sources L. Coyote May 2017 #23

He's making shit up! Foamfollower May 2017 #32

It is laughable when the person with no information says "come back when you have information"! . nt Bernardo de La Paz May 2017 #41

Wishes aren't information and all Mensch and Carter are peddling are wishes. Foamfollower May 2017 #50

All you're peddling are ad hominems. Qutzupalotl May 2017 #95

Foamfollower truthaddict247 May 2017 #65

Yes, Donald Trump is always backpedaling to cover his ass. You've got that right. n/t pnwmom May 2017 #30

I'll believe Flynn...and Manafort too. Think Trump is a big dose of Hopium right now. Feathery Scout May 2017 #14

Hopium! calimary May 2017 #18

Yep! I have no doubt he is a traitor. But did he leave proof? And will the Reps allow it to Feathery Scout May 2017 #39

Does anyone mention what the indictments are for? I'm betting that the indictments TheDebbieDee May 2017 #24

There was an FBI raid in Alexandria, Virginia, on Thursday at a Republican fundraising company. . nt Bernardo de La Paz May 2017 #26

Do you mean the raid in Annapolis, MD, Bernardo? Leghorn21 May 2017 #69

Oops, yes, you got it. Thanks for correcting me! . . nt Bernardo de La Paz May 2017 #72

It was about a case from 2013. former9thward May 2017 #73

The owner of the place said that. It's like taking the suspect's word. FBI was mute. Madam45for2923 May 2017 #78

The owner of the place read the search warrant. former9thward May 2017 #80

That was what they knew was there. Qutzupalotl May 2017 #82

Is it public the warrant? Madam45for2923 May 2017 #84

Search warrants specify places & causes (reason). This one probably sealed because of bigger issues Bernardo de La Paz May 2017 #85

If you think a major FBI op that size is about a CIVIL case that was SETTLED, go ahead. Bernardo de La Paz May 2017 #83

Always good to know we have an expert in FBI operations on DU. former9thward May 2017 #90

I'm not. Do you care to debate my points or do you wish to attack me again? Bernardo de La Paz May 2017 #92

I get that he's not an attorney, but presumably his "sources" are. DefenseLawyer May 2017 #29

I'm pretty sure his "sources" are his fevered mind Foamfollower May 2017 #33

+1 BannonsLiver May 2017 #45

+1 Takket May 2017 #56

And I'm pretty sure they're not. GliderGuider May 2017 #58

That's your right. Foamfollower May 2017 #60

+Another 1 LovingA2andMI May 2017 #107

I will keep reading LM and CT and make up my own mind. Thank You very much! Madam45for2923 May 2017 #86