Taylor and Mensch now report, based on separate sources, a sealed indictment against DT.

[jberryhill]

140. "But to flat out think that there could be no indictment for impeachment is naive"

That's not even what my answer to your question was.

Your question:

"With all that's happened in the past week, with the firing of Comey and the admittance by Trump that he fired Comey to obstruct the investigation into Russian collusion, that there is no chance in hell of an indictment to start impeachment?"

Now, given the grammatical problems with that question in the first place, I assume there is a missing "do you think" before the word "that".

You are asking if there is "no chance". That was your question.

I answered the question "No". I do not agree there is "that there is no chance in hell" of an indictment.

If you are going to ask a "yes or no" question, please try to understand what you are asking, or what the answer means.

I do not agree with your proposition that there is "no chance" of a sealed indictment, filed somewhere, naming someone, of doing something. Accordingly, I answered "no".

Then you come back and and say that I "flat out think that there could be no indictment". That's not even what my answer to your question said.

Let me give you a friendly tip that may save you a lot of problems communicating. When you ask a "yes or no question" try not to include a negative in the question, such as "no chance".

Things like "Isn't it not untrue that you were not at the murder scene?" are not good questions, because of the work required to understand what "yes" or "no" even means in response to them.

You have either (a) not understood your own question, or (b) not understood the answer to it.