Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Demsrule86

(71,523 posts)
26. That is true...but Charlottesville area is becoming an extension of Northern Virginia.
Mon May 15, 2017, 09:51 AM
May 2017

Albermarle County went for Hillary by more than 20 points...59% to 34%. It is not a red area.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

The protest was not in Richmond, it was in Charlottesville. Yonnie3 May 2017 #1
Jefferson's University of Virginia trof May 2017 #6
Yes and rally leader, white supremacist Richard Spencer, got a BA at UVA in 2001. n/t Yonnie3 May 2017 #7
Yeah, I think I just looked at where it was filed ProudLib72 May 2017 #8
This is local, so it jumped out at me. Yonnie3 May 2017 #10
My point is the absurd rationalization of racism ProudLib72 May 2017 #12
Ha! I was worried someone might think I was condoning them. Yonnie3 May 2017 #15
The south truly was devastated by the war Yupster May 2017 #17
Most of those there are from elsewhere... Demsrule86 May 2017 #22
The city is not redneck but Yonnie3 May 2017 #24
That is true...but Charlottesville area is becoming an extension of Northern Virginia. Demsrule86 May 2017 #26
Yes, but blue mostly near the city. Yonnie3 May 2017 #27
I wonder if he died still rationalizing evil. Boomerproud May 2017 #2
Isn't every age Yupster May 2017 #18
I think he was trying to rationalize something in a different time. kentuck May 2017 #3
By the end of his life Lincoln did. Thaddeus Stevens was always there. DemocratSinceBirth May 2017 #4
We would have been treestar May 2017 #5
Today is not all that different ProudLib72 May 2017 #9
I like your posts, but disagree on this point: raccoon May 2017 #29
I didn't explain that correctly in the previous post ProudLib72 May 2017 #32
Just before the end of the Civil War, Yupster May 2017 #33
Wow. Now that is interesting. nt raccoon May 2017 #35
It was a very interesting tid-bit of US history Yupster May 2017 #37
What did Lincoln (and congress) make of Grant pulling rank? ProudLib72 May 2017 #38
Yes, Grant was pushing Lincoln to do what he thought he wanted to do anyway Yupster May 2017 #39
Historians call it Yupster May 2017 #20
Why were there generals like Grant who truly believed in the cause they were fighting for? DemocratSinceBirth May 2017 #23
Lee was an unreconstructed racist. Buzz cook May 2017 #11
I agree ProudLib72 May 2017 #13
Revisionists keep trotting out the "arm the slaves" letter Buzz cook May 2017 #16
Lee wanted to arm the slaves because Yupster May 2017 #19
He was a traitor, plain and simple, and quite frankly, what we now call white priviledge is... brush May 2017 #28
It was only fitting that his inherited estate became Arlinton Cemetary. Scruffy1 May 2017 #14
Which general do you think would have done significantly better than Lee Yupster May 2017 #21
My Confederate ancestor survived Pickett's charge... VOX May 2017 #25
Interesting post. That's good that you know so much about him. raccoon May 2017 #30
True. He wasn't on the muster sheet until April, 1862... VOX May 2017 #34
Sadly, it wasn't only a Southern ideology. Caliman73 May 2017 #31
Lee was speaking from the ignorance engendered by his privilege. n/t Orsino May 2017 #36
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Analysis of a Robert E Le...»Reply #26