Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

onenote

(46,094 posts)
26. No.
Mon May 15, 2017, 10:31 AM
May 2017

First of all, the tax opinion letters I've seen rarely have attachments, so I don't know what the attorney is referring to when he suggests that back up information is "always" provided. Indeed, the typical tax opinion letter contains a disclaimer by the attorneys that they are accepting the factual premises on which the letter is based as true and have not independently verified them.

Second, and more significantly, the attorney-client privilege has next to nothing to do with whether tax returns can be obtained through "discovery" in non-tax litigation. Instead, the courts have created a "common law" privilege specific as to the discoverability of tax returns through subpoenas in civil cases. In most jurisdictions this privilege is "qualified" -- meaning it can be overcome through a showing that the information in the tax return is relevant to the case and cannot be obtained through other means.

In the case of a criminal case, the standard for subpoenas seeking tax returns is presented in 26 U.S.C. § 6103(i). Again, attorney-client privilege has nothing to do with it.

As noted above, the letter sent by Trump's lawyers isn't a "tax opinion letter" -- a very specific type of legal document. It's not clear why the tax attorney quoted in the OP would analyze it as if it was a tax opinion letter.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

This is absolutely right on. Raven May 2017 #1
I've seen many tax opinion letters. I don't think this is a tax opinion letter. onenote May 2017 #11
You are absolutely correct... Raven May 2017 #13
1924 Law allowing the Congress to view Tax Records? mitch96 May 2017 #25
The Senate won't use that law volstork May 2017 #28
In other words, republican Comrade Casino* and his Las Vegas-style lawyers Achilleaze May 2017 #2
K & R for visibility ...nt N_E_1 for Tennis May 2017 #3
K&R. Nt The Polack MSgt May 2017 #4
Excellent! Baitball Blogger May 2017 #5
Crooked Donnie. n/t ginnyinWI May 2017 #6
This Crooked Tax Letter panfluteman May 2017 #16
Thanks for the intersting analysis if what the letter really means in terms of what a lawyer means Nitram May 2017 #7
so, basically most of his income NewJeffCT May 2017 #8
Can we use 3? Bradical79 May 2017 #9
I have copied and pasted the FB post and sent it to my reps. ehrnst May 2017 #10
No. onenote May 2017 #26
Avoidence terminology randr May 2017 #12
Kind of what everybody knew... Wounded Bear May 2017 #14
Seem to recall one of the trump sons responding to a reporter's Enoki33 May 2017 #20
Absolutely... Wounded Bear May 2017 #22
K&R. Valuable illumination. Thanks for posting. (nt) Paladin May 2017 #15
this non-laywer thinks unless actual tax returns are released any letter is B.S. and should be mulsh May 2017 #17
the financial conflicts of interest will be much easier to prove than collusion with Russia yurbud May 2017 #18
Right. None of them want to start throwing stones in their glass houses. erronis May 2017 #24
If only he had sent it "registered" grantcart May 2017 #19
So this letter means about as much as the letter from Buns_of_Fire May 2017 #21
Pretty much... Wounded Bear May 2017 #23
Yup. About as credible as his doctor's letter. nt SunSeeker May 2017 #27
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Tax attorney on the certi...»Reply #26