Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: EXCLUSIVE: Sealed Indictment granted against Donald Trump [View all]L. Coyote
(51,129 posts)133. EXCLUSIVE: U.S Marshals Service Readying in #TrumpRussia case
Link to tweet
I love the irony of the quote in bold below. Pigs find truffles they cannot see underground using their sense of smell. Whether or not the pig can see is irrelevant, someone is directing the pig where to smell. So, right off, we know we have a writer who gets things wrong writing that another writer gets things wrong. The need for vigilance in distinguishing real journalism from fake news is well established indeed.
New fake news dilemma: sites publish real scoops amid mess of false reports
16 May 2017 11.39 EDT
Louise Mensch is among a number of bloggers offering a mix of true and inaccurate stories, forcing readers to discern for truth for themselves
The need for vigilance in distinguishing real journalism from fake news has become well established since Donald Trump was elected with help from bogus online stories.
But readers are now being confronted with an even tougher challenge: decoding the work of writers whose track records of faulty reporting are occasionally interrupted by stories that are actually true.
The trait has appeared among pro- and anti-Trump writers alike, as bloggers on each side of a chaotic political crisis mix information from knowledgeable insiders with wild allegations about their opponents.
Media experts said readers should remain on guard.
Even a blind pig finds a truffle once in a while, said Kathleen Culver, director of the University of Madison-Wisconsins Center for Journalism Ethics. .......
16 May 2017 11.39 EDT
Louise Mensch is among a number of bloggers offering a mix of true and inaccurate stories, forcing readers to discern for truth for themselves
The need for vigilance in distinguishing real journalism from fake news has become well established since Donald Trump was elected with help from bogus online stories.
But readers are now being confronted with an even tougher challenge: decoding the work of writers whose track records of faulty reporting are occasionally interrupted by stories that are actually true.
The trait has appeared among pro- and anti-Trump writers alike, as bloggers on each side of a chaotic political crisis mix information from knowledgeable insiders with wild allegations about their opponents.
Media experts said readers should remain on guard.
Even a blind pig finds a truffle once in a while, said Kathleen Culver, director of the University of Madison-Wisconsins Center for Journalism Ethics. .......
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
134 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
I know, but I'm still a dog anticipating a bone from whatever source it may come.
NBachers
May 2017
#7
OP edited with the news: Trump sealed indictment, intended to be basis of impeachment.
L. Coyote
May 2017
#10
Trump himself is STILL CALLING IT "FAKE NEWS" but wanted Comey to ensure that he wasn't being
anneboleyn
May 2017
#118
Having to ask if you are being investigated is an admission of guilty of something.
L. Coyote
May 2017
#119
amazing Mensch keeps landing this huge stories when no one else in the media has any idea
Takket
May 2017
#11
Oui oui! Why, just look how quickly he learnt allllll about "healthcare" in a matter of a couple of
Leghorn21
May 2017
#67
"Says who?!", dammit! - hell L., things are moving fast tonight, but here's a linky to
Leghorn21
May 2017
#74
I missed linking this thread before it closed, but the Mensch trolls were there right away.
L. Coyote
May 2017
#17
Well, it's Saturday night, so I'm guessing at some point they'll call it a prank
ucrdem
May 2017
#22
WHY THE HELL was that thread locked? DUers link to RawStory all the time. The Mensch trolls are out!
anneboleyn
May 2017
#117
I just switched to them after watching Woodward and Bernstein for forty years.
L. Coyote
May 2017
#21
Unless this is confirmed I wont believe it as sources have been wrong in the past. nt
cstanleytech
May 2017
#27
Their sources have been good in the past, so I'd be more positive about this.
L. Coyote
May 2017
#32
Even the best journalists get it wrong, sometimes on accident and sometimes its done to take them
cstanleytech
May 2017
#38
FISA courts don't issue indictments, folks. Their power is limited to
The Velveteen Ocelot
May 2017
#30
As long as he is President and Congress refuses to impeach would any indictment even do any good
cstanleytech
May 2017
#42
I think you could have video tape proof of him selling the nuclear codes to Russia and the Repugants
cstanleytech
May 2017
#47
Well I agree with people doing what they can locally being of prime importance...
renegade000
May 2017
#51
Aye that is their Achilles heel at this moment providing its properly exploited.
cstanleytech
May 2017
#53
There are specific, detailed rules governing the procedures for federal grand juries.
The Velveteen Ocelot
May 2017
#57
If the grand jury was conveyed by the FISA court, it is likely a NatSec case.
L. Coyote
May 2017
#80
I wish this to be true more than anything I have ever wished for in my life
Quixote1818
May 2017
#78
Definition of "sealed indictment" for anyone who doesn't understand (like me)...
lamp_shade
May 2017
#86
Have you forgotten the FBI Directoer James Comey verified her earlier exclusive reporting.
L. Coyote
May 2017
#89
4UR reading pleasure: Full transcript: FBI Director James Comey testifies on Russian interference
L. Coyote
May 2017
#97
I just re-edited the OP to clarify. Plus the big new news is in the OP: Manafort and Flynn indicted
L. Coyote
May 2017
#94
Subpoenas issued for Flynn associates by the Grand Jury indicting Trump, Manafort, Flynn, and others
L. Coyote
May 2017
#111
If Trump had released his taxes and was not hiding his collusions we would not need speculation.
Madam45for2923
May 2017
#96
Dana Boente is leading the Russia probe, although the decision to prosecute falls with Rosenstein.
L. Coyote
May 2017
#100
Flynn-associate subpoenas were issued by Dana Boente, EDVA US Atty who succeeded Yates
L. Coyote
May 2017
#105
Empty Wheel weights in on Special Counsel: Boente Is the Best Short Term Solution.
L. Coyote
May 2017
#107
"No one is above the law, not a high public official, not even the highest public official." Boente
L. Coyote
May 2017
#109
I read a theory that Obama's firing of Boente might have been a head fake.
GliderGuider
May 2017
#125
At end of string is money laundering, RICO, FARA, Obstruction, Conspiracy ... just getting started.
L. Coyote
May 2017
#116
RICO case against ***the entire GOP*** Reince Priebus is on tape, sources say
L. Coyote
May 2017
#120
What does it even mean to say a RICO case is being brought against the "entire" GOP?
onenote
May 2017
#129
Marshal Order of Execution began yesterday - search and seizure in 10 locations
L. Coyote
May 2017
#134