Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

ElizabethB

(24 posts)
21. Okay, but this isn't just "politics" for me
Thu Jul 5, 2012, 11:27 PM
Jul 2012

Insurers can now use the US Preventive Services Task Force ruling as a reason to stop covering mammograms and prostate cancer testing for women under 50 and men under 70. The government can't very well prosecute a private insurer that chooses not to cover tests that the US government itself has ruled as "unnecessary" now can they? And, the government healthcare program isn't going to cover something it has deemed as unnecessary. Use your common sense! Why do you think the mammogram holding resulted in such public outrage by women? And why did the USPSTF website have shut down after their decision on PSA testing?

The PSA test is just a simple blood test. It's also the ONLY test available at present!! If prostate cancer is caught within the prostate there is almost a 100% survival rate...if it's not (as was the case with my Dad), it's a death sentence. Testing is expensive, and I can't help but think that the USPTSF decision was just a risk/loss analysis. If men aren't screened they will only find out if they have prostate cancer once they are exhibiting actual symptoms and it has metastasized.

My Dad, two uncles, and one cousin were all diagnosed with prostate cancer in the past five years. These men are not all related to each other either (different sides of the family). My Dad is the only one that didn't catch it and after watching him go through chemo, radiation, and hormone therapy for three years...my heart is absolutely broken. Now he takes the PSA test weekly to monitor how his chemo is working. He starts second line therapy next week (stage IV). I'm damn grateful that my other relatives and my Dad at least had a chance to fight it. It kills me that we are going to see a return to pre-PSA statistics.

Can you explain how this decision won't result in a certain number of "expendable lives"? How is this not healthcare rationing?

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Elizabeth Edwards?? Control-Z Jul 2012 #1
I hope he's flooded with wake-up calls Ilsa Jul 2012 #2
Check your facts...No more routine checkups anyway! ElizabethB Jul 2012 #3
Yeah, damn that Obama! Iggo Jul 2012 #4
It's not Obama's "Preventive Services Task Force" OKNancy Jul 2012 #5
You are wrong again ElizabethB Jul 2012 #13
preventative medicine is not FFRREEEE under obamacare. mopinko Jul 2012 #6
That's awesome ElizabethB Jul 2012 #14
can you provide me with a link stating that they aren't? mopinko Jul 2012 #16
Yes, but have you heard of Google? It's really helpful :) ElizabethB Jul 2012 #17
it doesn't say anything about insurance coverage. mopinko Jul 2012 #18
Once again...please try google ElizabethB Jul 2012 #19
this is how it works on du- you make a statement mopinko Jul 2012 #49
Here you go, this shows they will be covered in routine checkups. uppityperson Jul 2012 #33
They will be covered. cyberswede Jul 2012 #34
Yay for more Faux Snooze misinformation!! BumRushDaShow Jul 2012 #8
I'm not quoting Fox ElizabethB Jul 2012 #20
Link? trumad Jul 2012 #9
Tell us more about the death panels that don't really exist! Arkana Jul 2012 #11
Okay, but this isn't just "politics" for me ElizabethB Jul 2012 #21
That is not in the ACA. Ruby the Liberal Jul 2012 #22
It's not fear mongering...it's reality. ElizabethB Jul 2012 #23
How's this? cyberswede Jul 2012 #25
For crying outloud....Thanks for proving my point! ElizabethB Jul 2012 #35
Unnecessary to screen EVERYONE. How does showing covered screenings mean they won't be covered? uppityperson Jul 2012 #36
Okay in Baby steps ElizabethB Jul 2012 #41
Your link goes to 1995 Guide. Here's current info on PSA tests, etc, from uspstf uppityperson Jul 2012 #26
Sorry for the error but it says the same thing anyway!!! ElizabethB Jul 2012 #28
Not for everyone. There are reasons why. Did you read those? uppityperson Jul 2012 #31
Oh for Pete's sake... cyberswede Jul 2012 #32
Yes and I responded his post as well---that just proves my point ElizabethB Jul 2012 #42
uspstf on breast cancer screenings... uppityperson Jul 2012 #27
And like I said before ElizabethB Jul 2012 #29
"The decision to start regular, biennial screening mammography before the age of 50 should be an... uppityperson Jul 2012 #30
But ACA will cover them. nt uppityperson Jul 2012 #37
Perhaps that is because Breast Cancer SunsetDreams Jul 2012 #40
DRE and PCA3 are 2 other tests, PSA is not "the ONLY test". uppityperson Jul 2012 #24
You should probably stop drinking the red stuff in your thermometer. Arkana Jul 2012 #47
Links & Views ElizabethB Jul 2012 #12
You don't like the fact that Obamacare will continue to cover psa and mammograms? Seriously? uppityperson Jul 2012 #38
you are misinforming people ElizabethB Jul 2012 #43
And evidently Republicans don't die of acute stupidity. hobbit709 Jul 2012 #7
I'm sure Mr. Collins is drawing on years of medical experience Arkana Jul 2012 #10
Knowledge is dangerous and Ignorance is cheap $$$ ElizabethB Jul 2012 #15
Since it is in the ACA that ins companies cover them, how is it healthcare rationing? uppityperson Jul 2012 #39
Why are you doing this? ElizabethB Jul 2012 #44
Oh goodness here: SunsetDreams Jul 2012 #45
ummm yeah...but the Topic of the thread was the PSA test for Prostate Cancer ElizabethB Jul 2012 #46
Oh I see, SunsetDreams Jul 2012 #48
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»GOP Candidate Chris Colli...»Reply #21