Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Showing Original Post only (View all)

Honeycombe8

(37,648 posts)
Thu May 18, 2017, 04:31 AM May 2017

I don't understand why some pundits say thin case for obstruction of justice [View all]

When the person in power says, "Drop the case. He's a good guy. Let it go." That's as clear as it can get, I would think. Yet pundits are saying that's a thin case.

How much clearer could it be? Him saying, "You either drop the case or I'll send Guido to make you an offer you can't refuse"?

Then when Comey doesn't drop the Flynn case, Trump ultimately fires him.

This is EXACTLY what obstruction of justice would sound like. The fact that it didn't work isn't relevant.

I don't get it.

5 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»I don't understand why so...