Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Scruffy1

(3,556 posts)
18. Every federal district has different insurers.
Fri May 19, 2017, 11:15 AM
May 2017

The federal insurance is under Benefeds. They don't really manage it, but the insurers have to meet specific rquirements to be listed. Where I live we have a choice between Blue Cross, Medica, Health Partners and maybe one more. If you live in DC there are a lot more. It's really the same as any other group insurance and it's not cheap. I get so tired of hearing about rediclous federal benefits from the unknowing. The last year i worked my family plan was $18,000 per year, and typically federal employees pay 50%. Unless you have a really good paying job, it is beyond the reach of the average hourly emplyee. I worked for the USPS, so we got a little better deal and only paid 40%, while congress critters paid 50%. This was a union advantage. Even then, I couldn't afford the "deluxe" plan as it would have cost me $700. per month. Instead you get saddled with copays, so it comes out about the same if you have health problems. This might make a good sound bit, but it is no solution to the high cost of health care.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

So would these insurers exit the federal market too? greymattermom May 2017 #1
I think that is her point. Demsrule86 May 2017 #10
D*mn right, I'll have what she has. That's all I've ever wanted was what congress has. eom a kennedy May 2017 #2
Doesn't this amount to allowing insurance companies House of Roberts May 2017 #3
My first thought too SHRED May 2017 #4
No...there are many states like Georgia that did not extend Medicare and did not Demsrule86 May 2017 #9
All states have Federal Employee Program plans for those federal employees. cbdo2007 May 2017 #11
So a Fed employee in Alabama House of Roberts May 2017 #12
Every federal district has different insurers. Scruffy1 May 2017 #18
In Alabama, BC/BS is about it. House of Roberts May 2017 #19
The "across state lines" thing is a bogus RW talking point... Wounded Bear May 2017 #20
Nice concept, but there are some pretty significant logistical issues Ms. Toad May 2017 #5
Medicare buy-in would be better Trekologer May 2017 #6
I disagree ...this is very clever and puts it on Congress to explain why they get health care and Demsrule86 May 2017 #8
Agree! Another hole for GOPers to fall in and crawl out of! dae May 2017 #14
The more holes the better...one hopes for at least a broken leg... Demsrule86 May 2017 #23
That is clever. Demsrule86 May 2017 #7
Very good, but once again Access does NOT equate to coverage aeromanKC May 2017 #13
Post win! LittleGirl May 2017 #17
Presumably there are subsidies in the plan...nt Wounded Bear May 2017 #21
At what cost? SHRED May 2017 #15
Sounds good to me! SunSeeker May 2017 #16
And what does that cost when the individual is paying? Lee-Lee May 2017 #22
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Claire introduces bill to...»Reply #18