Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Orsino

(37,428 posts)
110. What independent run?
Fri May 19, 2017, 10:40 AM
May 2017

Lieberman and Sanders were indeed edge cases, being barely/sorta-still Democrats. Lieberman at least had long-standing party membership, and Sanders had caucused Dem, but these candidates tested the rather vague promise of neutrality and the expected promotion of Democrats. I'm not suprised that there were a lot of complaints about both candidacies. Clinton, in particular, had been a shoo-in twice, and any primary challenge was going to trigger vocal opposition. We want to win, after all.

The lawsuit that will examine the matter is not a criminal one, and it seems unlikely that anything will come of it.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

I need to see a vid of this ... not just a quote to believe it. uponit7771 May 2017 #1
REMEMBER: The old divide and conquer gambit? NotMyFuhrer May 2017 #61
Right?? wildeyed May 2017 #144
Reported by an ex-Gawker writer and confirmed by a Wall Street blog. wildeyed May 2017 #138
But he wasn't prepared to run at the time True Dough May 2017 #2
HIS SON HAD JUST FUCKING DIED LeftyMom May 2017 #12
Show some decorum True Dough May 2017 #14
That is getting to be a little bit tiresome to. Yes, Joe Biden lost his son, and that is tragic, still_one May 2017 #31
Is there anyone we won't throw under the bus? Anyone at all? AtheistCrusader May 2017 #164
Excuse me. Who is throwing who under the bus? Every chance he gets he brings still_one May 2017 #165
I refer you back to the word 'instrospection'. AtheistCrusader May 2017 #171
Agreed. cwydro May 2017 #72
I love Joe but some things are better left unsaid BannonsLiver May 2017 #3
+1! TheDebbieDee May 2017 #42
Especially stupid ones. RUSSIA. COMEY. FAKE NEWS, Hortensis May 2017 #60
Particularly when we don't know for sure he said it. wildeyed May 2017 #139
Shut up, Joe dalton99a May 2017 #4
Yes Joe... you're in violation of Rule #1... even if true. InAbLuEsTaTe May 2017 #5
It's not true. He'd have had the memory of his Anita Hill fiasco trailing him pnwmom May 2017 #30
Joe would make an awesome president... InAbLuEsTaTe May 2017 #187
Like he did in 2004 joeybee12 May 2017 #188
When Biden ran in the Dem primary he got about 3%. mr_liberal May 2017 #6
He did give the best line of the debates, though charlyvi May 2017 #8
And the worst performance at a hearing. pnwmom May 2017 #44
Yep, no way would he be my choice in a primary. I'm guessing if he ran O'Malley wouldn't have had seaglass May 2017 #69
Exactly. LisaM May 2017 #162
correct for who ? white men who feel they are being oppressed at seeing non white men in positions JI7 May 2017 #7
Post removed Post removed May 2017 #9
The results indicate he is correct flotsam May 2017 #10
Post removed Post removed May 2017 #11
I really don't want to reply to this, but... That Guy 888 May 2017 #19
This is ridiculous. Hillary got 55 percent of the vote. Bernie got 43 percent. StevieM May 2017 #35
It's news stories about lawsuits. I didn't write them, I didn't comment on them. That Guy 888 May 2017 #39
There were far more debates in 2008 than 2016 karynnj May 2017 #128
They added more debates, and they were one-on-one debates. StevieM May 2017 #131
The state parties run the caucuses...virtually every state party in a caucus state Ken Burch May 2017 #161
I don't disagree that the Sanders phenomenon was real and legitimate. StevieM May 2017 #163
If I had my way, we'd get rid of ALL the caucuses. Ken Burch May 2017 #169
For whatever the reason Caucuses get much lower turnout than primaries. StevieM May 2017 #172
In 2008, HRC became, whether she wanted to be or not, the "stop Obama" candidate. Ken Burch May 2017 #175
My point is that Hillary has as much right to complain about the caucuses, and their effects, as StevieM May 2017 #178
Nothing I'm saying here is about delegitimizing Hillary's nomination. Ken Burch May 2017 #183
I don't blame Bernie for her defeat, I blame Comey. I actually try not to emphasize StevieM May 2017 #184
I agree with all that you said there. Ken Burch May 2017 #189
Your post is pure BULL Cha May 2017 #47
The DNC also assisted him. How? By insisting on its right to hold low-participation, pnwmom May 2017 #55
I believe each STATE's Democrats determine how their election is done -- not the DNC karynnj May 2017 #96
The DNC allows the states to do this. It doesn't have to. pnwmom May 2017 #99
You wrote she got none, I corrected karynnj May 2017 #127
When your candidate joins a party late, going up against one of its supremely-qualified icons... Orsino May 2017 #93
So "the Party" would have been happy if Sanders had siphoned off votes with an independent run? That Guy 888 May 2017 #101
What independent run? Orsino May 2017 #110
If Senator Sanders had not run as an Democratic candidate in the Democratic Primary... That Guy 888 May 2017 #137
Yep. We want to win our* way. Orsino May 2017 #147
Looking back now, with 20/20 hindsight? I wish he would have run 3rd party. kcr May 2017 #136
Wow. Where do you think Sanders votes would have come from, Republicans? That Guy 888 May 2017 #152
If you read the Repug plan to run against Bernie, bdjhawk May 2017 #54
Mahalo for your post, bdjhawk.. So true. Cha May 2017 #57
I agree. It's nutty for these two to think that Putin would have sat back and let either pnwmom May 2017 #71
We can speculate about what would have happened. Voltaire2 May 2017 #75
We know with absolute certainty that it took the FBI/Comey, the real witch hunts (Benghazi, email), JTFrog May 2017 #94
Well there were certainly many factors in her defeat. Voltaire2 May 2017 #116
There are many factors in every election. The issue is that she had the race won--decisively--until StevieM May 2017 #174
Then NO one was the right candidate. You can't have it both ways. kcr May 2017 #104
No we don't know that with certainty. Voltaire2 May 2017 #111
It's also entirely possible that of everyone who ran in 2016, Hillary was our best shot kcr May 2017 #123
Sure. That's part of the difference between Voltaire2 May 2017 #132
I thought we were talking about 2016 and who the right candidate was. kcr May 2017 #135
She is also the only candidate who proved that she could be Trump, and was about to beat him, StevieM May 2017 #176
I would like to read the GOP plan to run against Bernie... Trial_By_Fire May 2017 #112
Where is that plan? I'd love to read it. WoonTars May 2017 #153
Bernie would have lost to Trump. Tom67 May 2017 #15
+1 n/t BannonsLiver May 2017 #18
OK,-1 n/t flotsam May 2017 #23
+1 means I agree with you, not sure if that was clear. BannonsLiver May 2017 #25
That was lost in translation flotsam May 2017 #26
Bernie sure showed how he could win. Most everything he endorsed in 2016 lost. As for Biden, his still_one May 2017 #24
You know... compare HRC's "unfavorables" ... JHan May 2017 #37
yes JHan, and I am well aware of Biden's baggage still_one May 2017 #41
You think it occurs to folks making these arguments? JHan May 2017 #43
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ still_one May 2017 #50
She also had much higher favorables than Biden back when she was S.O.S. StevieM May 2017 #177
Yep ++++ JHan May 2017 #179
He said she was never a great candidate and would have made a really good President BeyondGeography May 2017 #84
hmmm.. Tom67 May 2017 #13
Well President Obama did and I did too. You're Cha May 2017 #16
WRONGTHINK. BADSPEAK. NOT PERMITTED. DOUBLEPLUSUNGOOD! Warren DeMontague May 2017 #17
Nolan is a Hillary hating asshole. He writes for gawker. Regardless, the headline is a distortion still_one May 2017 #20
Let's instead ask-who is it that republicans know better than to run flotsam May 2017 #21
Gosh, when the only evidence you can present lapucelle May 2017 #67
The Journal of Economics and Finance is a "right wing fever dream"? former9thward May 2017 #88
Of course the journal exists; lapucelle May 2017 #117
If this is what Biden thinks and said ... LenaBaby61 May 2017 #22
Exactly Lena. Kick and Rec!!!!!!!!!! still_one May 2017 #32
+1,000,000 pnwmom May 2017 #46
K&R! lunamagica May 2017 #53
+ infinity Meowmee May 2017 #56
+1 octoberlib May 2017 #58
+1 lostnfound May 2017 #87
+1 uponit7771 May 2017 #97
We do not know what he said, for sure. wildeyed May 2017 #141
Yeah, he has a giant ego, like most politicians. And he's always been a big talker. pnwmom May 2017 #27
"Yeah, he has a giant ego, like most politicians. And he's always been a big talker." LenaBaby61 May 2017 #49
They can all debate it from the sidelines when we run some new people in 2020 Warren DeMontague May 2017 #28
The focus should be 2018, and the republican agenda. Everything else is self-defeating still_one May 2017 #34
Sure. And we ought to drag our recalcitrant backwards-lookers into the 21st century. Finally. Warren DeMontague May 2017 #45
I deal with 2020, in 2019 still_one May 2017 #51
I know. Warren DeMontague May 2017 #52
whether that was his opinion or not, it might have made sense saying it then, JCanete May 2017 #29
Well, this is how he would have distinguished himself: pnwmom May 2017 #33
I remeber him sucking pretty bad every time he was talking to the JCanete May 2017 #36
There are a lot of negatives with Biden, and that he keeps bringing this "if only" garbage up only still_one May 2017 #40
Clarance Thomas is a white male? redgreenandblue May 2017 #73
Every single Senator on the Senate panel -- the panel who was interrogating Anita -- pnwmom May 2017 #74
I think the point is Volstagg May 2017 #122
What a sad man 4now May 2017 #38
The voters kept Biden out of the race. If his early poll numbers showed him anywhere close to her StevieM May 2017 #48
I don't think Biden would have won octoberlib May 2017 #59
Joe must have had Tee Martunies or he forgot to pull the Talon tab on his mouth. democratisphere May 2017 #62
I guess this opens the door for me to say... Mike Nelson May 2017 #63
Showboater? Sometimes I think..n/t monmouth4 May 2017 #64
During the Anita Hill... Mike Nelson May 2017 #130
Well Duh quaker bill May 2017 #65
Gender dynamics Nonhlanhla May 2017 #66
I remember that he wasn't the most enthusiastic HRC supporter... aikoaiko May 2017 #68
Other than both being progressives, HRC and Biden don't have a lot in common. pnwmom May 2017 #70
she whupped his ass, last time he ran. She would have done it again. La Lioness Priyanka May 2017 #98
You have to run if you want to be the candidate...I love you Joe...but your family needed you. Demsrule86 May 2017 #76
Does Joe get a hide? BeyondGeography May 2017 #77
While wrong for saying it he is correct. Else You Are Mad May 2017 #78
I respectfully disagree on a couple of your points. StevieM May 2017 #146
Seriously Joe Biden, you have a heart of gold but your mind is getting rusty Le Gaucher May 2017 #79
The same thing would have happened to Joe. MoonRiver May 2017 #80
Democrats lose when Democrats live in the past. Give it up, Joe. Vinca May 2017 #81
Lordy lordy Joe. No need for this kind of talk at all from you. whow. riversedge May 2017 #82
Why did you single out that one quote and ignore the very next quote????? George II May 2017 #83
It's weird to see so many take this so personally BannonsLiver May 2017 #133
It's not "personal", many just don't like misrepresentations. The full quote/interview... George II May 2017 #158
it's not weird. Warren DeMontague May 2017 #182
Sometimes honesty is not the best policy Seasider May 2017 #85
Except the reverse happened in 2016 BeyondGeography May 2017 #86
You're whitewashing the "insurgent"..and what he stood for and what it says about America.. JHan May 2017 #105
Whoosh! BeyondGeography May 2017 #106
Yeah I got your point, JHan May 2017 #107
Well stated... check077 May 2017 #134
Biden is speculating Lurks Often May 2017 #89
another old man hillary Clinton has already beaten in a primary La Lioness Priyanka May 2017 #90
LOL. JHan May 2017 #103
65 million of us disagree, Joe. Orsino May 2017 #91
Well, that's helpful, Joe... MineralMan May 2017 #92
Mmm, mmh, mmh! NurseJackie May 2017 #95
I enthusiastically supported HRC, but... Expecting Rain May 2017 #100
When he's right, he's right. hopeforchange2008 May 2017 #102
Umm, Joe, that's not helpful at this point. herding cats May 2017 #108
It should be pretty obvious the selection of Clinton to be our Presidential candidate was decided jalan48 May 2017 #109
baloney...it was decided by primary voters. Joe had a son who died. Demsrule86 May 2017 #113
Then why did Biden just make this statement? jalan48 May 2017 #118
He shouldn't have...I love Joe but that was foolish. He wanted to run I think and has regrets... Demsrule86 May 2017 #166
except for where she got 4 million more votes than the person opposing her La Lioness Priyanka May 2017 #115
And she lost the election. That's Biden's point. jalan48 May 2017 #119
She did lose the election, but we don't know how Biden would have done with La Lioness Priyanka May 2017 #120
I think Biden would have won the Presidency. jalan48 May 2017 #121
Let's not forget that the GOP would have probably found a way to place Biden, Sanders, StevieM May 2017 #142
everything seems obvious in hindsight nt geek tragedy May 2017 #114
it's very unclear that Joe could have beaten Hillary in the primary, (but) andym May 2017 #124
Well, tRump is the president... Trial_By_Fire May 2017 #125
With all due respect, Mr Vice President... politicat May 2017 #126
Probably not helpful to say this now mvd May 2017 #129
Joe, we need to talk. nolabear May 2017 #140
Includes just a few of the Repug plays against Bernie bdjhawk May 2017 #143
Hopefully this is just Biden saying stupid s**t HeartachesNhangovers May 2017 #145
Joe "Foot-In-Mouth" Biden made a gaffe that is being twisted by HuffPo for clicks. wildeyed May 2017 #148
If Hillary wasn't correct, he sure as hell wasn't either. yurbud May 2017 #149
Well, of course he didn't, because he thought HE was the correct candidate. Iggo May 2017 #150
The big deal was that he said it when he didn't need to. HeartachesNhangovers May 2017 #151
Confirming the obvious is not a big deal. Iggo May 2017 #157
He's apparently supposed to spend the rest of his life in a state of self-abnegation BeyondGeography May 2017 #155
This message was self-deleted by its author ymetca May 2017 #154
My take on it: If Biden ran we could have ended up with Sanders in the GE Exilednight May 2017 #156
"People who voted for Sanders were never going to vote for a mainstream candidate..." Iggo May 2017 #159
What a well thought out reply. Oxford debate club would proud to have you. Exilednight May 2017 #167
I thought "Straight-up bullshit" was a little much. Iggo May 2017 #168
Profanity: the ignorant man's wit. Exilednight May 2017 #186
So...is Biden "trashing Democratic public figures" here? Ken Burch May 2017 #160
This is funny because... SaschaHM May 2017 #170
Yep. This times 100000000000 JHan May 2017 #191
The "correct candidate" wouldn't say this type of crap, especially at a time like this... ecstatic May 2017 #173
Agreed. frogmarch May 2017 #180
Apparently, from this thread, criticizing Biden is allowed Warren DeMontague May 2017 #181
Well, the majority of primary voters disagreed with you, Joe. GoCubsGo May 2017 #185
I would say STFU JOE Skittles May 2017 #190
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Biden: "I Never Thought H...»Reply #110