General Discussion

mhw

(678 posts)

24. No. On Claude's site it was pointed out that Rachel & other news sources

Sat May 20, 2017, 05:22 PM

May 2017

"must be following Taylor & Mensch because they seem to run a story within days of Louise & Claude's posting."

Claude & Louise's sources come from outside the Regs of US News.
Their sources cannot be revealed nor do they have to be. .

Perhaps US news stations have to adhere to stricter reporting guidlines, which is why Taylor & Mensch can report online, what theirvsources give them. No more, no less until they have more to offer on the subject.

US news can & does pick up Stories from Mensch & Taylor but cannot know their sources.
So when there is more to report & all has been checked through US regs, then they put the same story out .

Per Claude Taylor.

Click here to purchase valentine hearts!

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

92 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

The number of people working to dismiss Louise Mensch is growing [View all] bigtree May 2017 OP

Did she push out a message about SCOTUS or the Justice Dept. initiating impeachment? LonePirate May 2017 #1

no, she did not bigtree May 2017 #3

"Sources have confirmed that the Marshal of the Supreme Court spoke to Mr. Trump." BzaDem May 2017 #43

Dude! She most certainly did! Foamfollower May 2017 #85

It's like when you're toddler gets killed by an AK-47 but you call it the wrong name elehhhhna May 2017 #28

What does your post contribute to discussion? jberryhill May 2017 #2

lol bigtree May 2017 #13

Your post is meant to divide jberryhill May 2017 #25

???? I don't see that. I see more like an observation/discussion. Madam45for2923 May 2017 #32

Nonsense jberryhill May 2017 #45

Woah! You still getting a lot from that OP. Madam45for2923 May 2017 #50

Absolutely ATL Ebony May 2017 #81

Still not getting it jberryhill May 2017 #82

But why continue to beat a dead horse unless it's to measure the amount of discord achieved. ATL Ebony May 2017 #83

Well that's what people will do jberryhill May 2017 #91

Uncanny isn't it mhw May 2017 #4

Don't worry! There's a post under both their names about the Supreme Court's role in Demit May 2017 #11

But that wasn't the question. mhw May 2017 #17

I'll start a discredit Claude thread, if you like, The Velveteen Ocelot May 2017 #18

Oh, I think they both can share in the discredit. Demit May 2017 #23

Just like our president! Why should they be held to higher standard than he is elehhhhna May 2017 #30

Chief Justice of SCOTUS presides over Senate trial of impeached POTUS Sedona May 2017 #54

But SCOTUS doesn't notify the president that the impeachment process has begun, Demit May 2017 #61

Oh, of course it was sexism. The Velveteen Ocelot May 2017 #14

DU isn't sexist tho. So there is some other reason. mhw May 2017 #19

and what is that "obvious pattern"? hrmjustin May 2017 #36

What it is, is the many threads started against L Mensch. mhw May 2017 #46

First of all there have been threads questioning both and she is the more well known of them both. hrmjustin May 2017 #60

Nope that doesn't fit with what I've seen posted in a few days time. mhw May 2017 #64

+1 AgadorSparticus May 2017 #79

I have a problem with Claude too chowder66 May 2017 #87

It's clear the Bannon's new alt-right pile-on campaign against Mensch is in force. mhw May 2017 #88

And how does that figure into my issue with her? She lives in NY btw. chowder66 May 2017 #89

We both know why. It's pathetic n/t pnwmom May 2017 #29

Perhaps because she's a conservative and he's a Democrat. Kentonio May 2017 #73

Her reputation. kstewart33 May 2017 #5

That number would also include Skinner m-lekktor May 2017 #6

Well, Skinner doesn't know EVERYTHING... MineralMan May 2017 #8

And this: demmiblue May 2017 #37

He probably isn't too wild about fake news on this site. cwydro May 2017 #44

That's what I would assume. m-lekktor May 2017 #47

Yes. cwydro May 2017 #65

And so is her coterie of fans. MineralMan May 2017 #7

you mean 'fanatics,' right? bigtree May 2017 #16

The word "fan" comes from the word "fanatic." MineralMan May 2017 #41

Fanaticism leads to counterfanaticism bigtree May 2017 #62

Oh wow! So perfect! Fanaticism leads to counterfanaticism, which is just as much to be feared. Madam45for2923 May 2017 #90

She has demonstrated her ignorance of the basic procedures The Velveteen Ocelot May 2017 #9

That's because she keeps making wild and unsupportable claims that are frankly insane. Spider Jerusalem May 2017 #10

All the news stories about Trump this week were from leaks to the press wasupaloopa May 2017 #12

No. On Claude's site it was pointed out that Rachel & other news sources mhw May 2017 #24

I can't buy that. I think they are the left's version of wing nut radio wasupaloopa May 2017 #67

Wow. That's not true. I really doubt some here have rarely ever followed, nor really read mhw May 2017 #68

or maybe people just disagree and are skeptical.. same thing happened with Bev Harris OKNancy May 2017 #15

I'm in wait and see mode Mr. Ected May 2017 #20

it is not a sin to doubt her credibility. hrmjustin May 2017 #21

I'm part of it because she has reported some seriously egregious chowder66 May 2017 #22

And not one response to this well-researched and presented post. Shame that. Wish I could rec posts. X_Digger May 2017 #69

Thank you. nt chowder66 May 2017 #86

It is fairly obvious that Mensch in an intelligence asset deliberately influencing PufPuf23 May 2017 #26

But for what purpose? Charlotte Little May 2017 #39

I do not understand the purpose and your theories are as PufPuf23 May 2017 #42

Texas Air National Guard Memo jberryhill May 2017 #92

Never attribute to malice that which can be adequately explained by stupidity. n/t X_Digger May 2017 #70

Mensch and Intelligence are two words that sit together uncomfortably Kentonio May 2017 #74

Bots everywhere elehhhhna May 2017 #27

She is to Trump opponents what HA Goodman was to Bernie supporters nt geek tragedy May 2017 #31

Many on the left are "dupes" for fake news, it's not just the right. Cattledog May 2017 #33

Would you care to explain why... brooklynite May 2017 #34

Quite the pile-on, isn't it? nt GliderGuider May 2017 #35

I don't mind people critical or doubtful of her, I mind what seems obsessive posts/peer pressure for Madam45for2923 May 2017 #38

The number of people working to dismiss Louise Mensch is growing. LenaBaby61 May 2017 #55

This. nt LaydeeBug May 2017 #78

The United Kingdom Group was dismissing her before it was cool to muriel_volestrangler May 2017 #40

What about Claude Taylor. Anyone dissing him? They work together in mhw May 2017 #51

Plenty of people have mentioned Taylor melman May 2017 #58

Out of the 5 or so threads started just today alone how many mentioned his name? mhw May 2017 #66

I'm not aware of Claude Taylor being a former right wing politician who worked for Murdoch muriel_volestrangler May 2017 #72

Skepticism is a good thing. Trying to shut down threads containing her assertions, not so much. Warren DeMontague May 2017 #48

+1 GliderGuider May 2017 #49

+1 FreepFryer May 2017 #80

Wow, I'm only the second rec despite 51 replies Blue Ridge Virginia May 2017 #52

She's an odd duck Worktodo May 2017 #53

What do you expect? She's an "Unhinged British witch" and "a textbook succubus" L. Coyote May 2017 #56

All I have said about her and similar Twitter posters DefenseLawyer May 2017 #57

bigtree, imo saidsimplesimon May 2017 #59

It is human nature to believe things that confirm your bias GulfCoast66 May 2017 #63

She is going after the hackers. L. Coyote May 2017 #71

Well, it would be nice if one of her bombshells actually went off Orrex May 2017 #75

+1 dalton99a May 2017 #77

It is VERY noticeable!! AgadorSparticus May 2017 #76

So is the number of stupid people falling for her bullshit. alarimer May 2017 #84