Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

mhw

(678 posts)
5. A candidate with "no history" would have made no difference in the outcome of 2016.
Sun May 21, 2017, 08:32 PM
May 2017

The selection of DT & RW power control was organized long before the primaries began.
The massive direction & money it took to pull off such a coup wasn't just something put together in a matter of months.
It was years in the making.

It wasn't Hillary Clinton that lost the electoral college.

It was an international criminal organization.
That's how we got here.

None of this was actually Hillary's fault at all.
It's the fact that the RW's lies about her were taken at face value by so many & even now, knowing what the "republican party" did to get where they are today, its astonishing that there are still those who rely on the intentional slander & lies to proclaim why "she lost"..

Fact is, she had an impeccable career.
Her outreach for human rights followed her from a young age.
Her knowledge of bringing about lasting policies necessary to bring about a future for the world, where the playing field held promise for all races & creeds, was what this world needed to move from war & despair to negotiating an existance that respected humanity in all its colors.

The baggage you say was what undid Hillary Clinton's Presidential chances really never existed at all.
To claim it did says the lie is still believed.

To still believe the slander & lies of the RW is why we have Trump & why we now watch the dismantling of our American civil & constitutional rights, & watch as human rights become an invisible thought from the past.

This is why she was silenced throughout the campaign.
Their first priority in selecting Trump was to keep Hillary Clinton from being heard.

Had she been allowed to proceed in an unbiased & fair campaign, her policies & words for the future of humanity would have drowned out the Republican Party.

They knew this. And this is why she was censored & slandered.
And people still lay the lies they told at the feet of Hillary Clinton, the 2016 loss to Trump & his massive & globally organized, international criminal billionare club for white thuggery is somehow her fault.

Hillary did nothing wrong. The Trump crime family just said she did.

Thanks
&
Love 2 William769






The Democrats need a candidate with no history leftstreet May 2017 #1
The American people got it, well most of us anyways. William769 May 2017 #2
A candidate with "no history" would have made no difference in the outcome of 2016. mhw May 2017 #5
Wow! sheshe2 May 2017 #7
* mhw May 2017 #11
Here are some facts to consider.... Trial_By_Fire May 2017 #9
Take a good look Mr.Bill May 2017 #15
Of course... the only way republicans can win is if they cheat... Trial_By_Fire May 2017 #19
And the number of voters purged with Interstate Crosscheck, now used in 30 states, Amaryllis May 2017 #32
Those number comparisons were irrelevant in 2016. mhw May 2017 #21
Why? Trial_By_Fire May 2017 #23
How about 2012? progree May 2017 #26
How can they be relevant? mhw May 2017 #29
why are you skipping 2012 ? JI7 May 2017 #42
Because... Trial_By_Fire May 2017 #48
Why did you skip 2012 ? JI7 May 2017 #41
+1 dalton99a May 2017 #10
Amen, Brother, Amen! BarbD May 2017 #27
I disagree Motownman78 May 2017 #33
Great post wysi May 2017 #36
It doesn't matter. DK504 May 2017 #24
Exactly. Thank you mhw May 2017 #30
I'd just like to amend your statement if I may justiceischeap May 2017 #35
Yes! mcar May 2017 #3
If we lived in a democracy... yallerdawg May 2017 #4
Just a clarification... Trial_By_Fire May 2017 #6
The reason we have the Electoral College Locutusofborg May 2017 #13
What?? There have been numerous amendments proposed (and passed) 20th century... JoeStuckInOH May 2017 #49
I'm pretty convinced Mr.Bill May 2017 #18
Clinton never got 50% of the vote so I doubt it. former9thward May 2017 #38
Reagan would not do well in the Country as it is Today . he would not win California . JI7 May 2017 #44
I like your plan, no invasion of Iraq, perhaps no destablization of the ME, and best of all Thinkingabout May 2017 #20
Even one change would change the entire future karynnj May 2017 #45
+1000 sheshe2 May 2017 #8
Yes shenmue May 2017 #14
Yes we do sheshe2 May 2017 #25
And a quarter-century of manufactured bile and foam-cannonades JHB May 2017 #12
When a GOP politician says "Americans voted for Trump" it means YOU ARE NOT an American! JoeOtterbein May 2017 #16
K&R. dchill May 2017 #17
Trump'll be haunted by HRC's numbers for the rest of his miserable days. oasis May 2017 #22
Great tweet Gothmog May 2017 #28
He lost the popular vote by 10 million dflprincess May 2017 #31
Those 7 million were against Hillary also. former9thward May 2017 #39
True.Hillary won a plurality not a majority dflprincess May 2017 #40
she still got millions more votes than Trump JI7 May 2017 #43
K & R SunSeeker May 2017 #34
YES, THIS EXACTLY! onecaliberal May 2017 #37
So the football team who held the ball the most wins the game? Baconator May 2017 #46
Until we abolish the electoral college, no president is elected by the voters. Voltaire2 May 2017 #47
So trump only won the most states. Unfortunately he still won the election. jmg257 May 2017 #50
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Trump was NOT ELECTED by ...»Reply #5