about that Hill story about Weiner being set up by a diabolical 15/16 year old girl.

[karynnj]

7. That seems far fetched.

Given Huma's own need to protect the privacy of the State Department and later the campaign, she absolutely should not have had that information on a shared computer -- even if she wholeheartedly trusted Weiner. I know couples do that -- but most of us do not work with information - that even when not classified -- should be held private. Not to mention, given that Weiner's tweets were certainly not PC, one might have guessed that he had a totally private laptop with that account on it.

For the target to have been what happened, the person would have to guess that Hillary's emails would be on a shared computer that Weiner used for his perverted tweets.

Not to mention, this is poorly sourced and it troubles me that they lead with - "it's not a 15 year old, but an almost 17 year old". Does that make anyone here feel better? The other angle that she was a Republican and tried to elicit this reaction to hurt Hillary, I suspect it more likely that she was intentionally wanting to get Weiner, which would embarrass Huma and possibly create a diversion among top campaign officials - possibly with Huma resigning.