Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: OMG: Supreme Court strikes down North Carolina congressional district maps [View all]calimary
(90,017 posts)21. That was my first question.
Yep - from the CNN story:
Two districts were at issue and the court split differently on its votes. In District 1, the legislature increased black voting age population from 47.6% to 52.65%. The court struck that map 8-0. The black majority voting population was also increased in District 12 from 43.7% to 50.66%. The court struck that map down 5-3.
Justice Neil Gorsuch didn't participate because he was not on the bench when the case was heard.
It STILL would have been voted down even if he had been able to vote on it. At best, that second map would have earned a 6-3 vote. At worst it would have been 5-4, so it still would have been struck down.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
50 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
OMG: Supreme Court strikes down North Carolina congressional district maps [View all]
sheshe2
May 2017
OP
SCOTUS has STILL not addressed the fact that the General Assembly is illegitimate.
wildeyed
May 2017
#40
Republicans say there is a compelling government interest in racial gerrymandering,
Dustlawyer
May 2017
#44
Clearly the Repugnants compelling reason in this case was to remain in power. nt
cstanleytech
May 2017
#47