Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

hlthe2b

(113,307 posts)

4. and you know this, how? Your view would be reassuring if it were not in conflict with every other

Reply to RhodeIslandOne (Original post)

Tue May 23, 2017, 06:25 AM

May 2017

source over the past two weeks--many which apparently are tied to those within O'Donnell's staff or inner circle. Granted, in contract negotiations tactics can include leaking information to pressure the other side. But,given the actions already taken by Andrew Lack (removal of many progressive voices in order to bring on more conservative or RW pundits), to suggest that is not a credible issue behind the negotiations, is just not logical to me.

Click here to purchase valentine hearts!

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

5 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Lawrence O'Donnell is in a contract negotiation. [View all] RhodeIslandOne May 2017 OP

Exactly. Both sides have incentives to plant stories that might not be accurate unblock May 2017 #1

Hopefully it's a real offer they lowball some just so they can have clean hands MattP May 2017 #2

Thanks for the info. Good to know. BigmanPigman May 2017 #3

and you know this, how? Your view would be reassuring if it were not in conflict with every other hlthe2b May 2017 #4

Your sources? octoberlib May 2017 #5