Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

tibbiit

(1,601 posts)
56. Me indifferent.
Tue May 23, 2017, 07:10 PM
May 2017

I hope she is right. I love reading it. I don't even care if she is proven nuts, her twitter is read by those close to the chump and it is upsetting to them!

Ive been here since 2003 and I remember Fitzmas! So Until the moment after it happens... then I'll celebrate!

tib

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Count me in. Shrike47 May 2017 #1
Thanks. That's a pretty cool rant. mhw May 2017 #2
KnR! Madam45for2923 May 2017 #3
It just seems like a lot of wishful thinking to me Stargleamer May 2017 #4
I'm finding too much wishful thinking in her posts Warpy May 2017 #5
I really have no idea who she is sarisataka May 2017 #6
I think Mensch is an intelligence agency asset PufPuf23 May 2017 #7
My thinking is along those lines too... JHB May 2017 #14
One thought is that Mensch is preparing the stage for a Trump resignation PufPuf23 May 2017 #17
A lot of this in reaction to what she said last week about indictments Jacquette May 2017 #28
Here. Tommy_Carcetti May 2017 #8
I take her w a boulder of salt. But I don't get the OTT obsession to discredit her emulatorloo May 2017 #9
I don't get that either sarah FAILIN May 2017 #30
Yeah, reminds me a little too much like the Fitzmas debacle of yore. progressoid May 2017 #10
yup. salin May 2017 #34
I pretty much ignore the threads that use her as a source. Kaleva May 2017 #11
It is as foolish to blindly accept as it is to refuse to consider any given source of information MedusaX May 2017 #12
Finally, a sensible approach RandomAccess May 2017 #15
Your Post & The One You Responded To Both Make Sense, As Does The OP... JimGinPA May 2017 #19
Have Manafort and Flynn actually been indicted? PoindexterOglethorpe May 2017 #26
You could ask a lawyer but sarah FAILIN May 2017 #31
Thank you for that explanation. PoindexterOglethorpe May 2017 #38
"Every piece of information-- regardless of its source" melman May 2017 #21
of course, but it is frequently of interest what they choose to bullshit about. Voltaire2 May 2017 #42
exactly. And build your own internal credibility score. Voltaire2 May 2017 #41
Count me in. lostnfound May 2017 #13
One of the things I've grown increasingly paranoid about is planted news justiceischeap May 2017 #16
If you read Mensch's tweets you will see she despises Trump and Putin. womanofthehills May 2017 #47
Taken with salt, exactly. Warren DeMontague May 2017 #18
Fitzmas was a set up to make democrats look uninformed. Don't want applegrove May 2017 #20
I'm definitely in this camp DefenseLawyer May 2017 #22
I don't know anything about Mensch and somehow I don't care. betsuni May 2017 #23
I can't get past the last name. Scurrilous May 2017 #24
I am skeptical dalton99a May 2017 #25
The only reason I've even heard of Louise Mensch is because I'm here on DU. PoindexterOglethorpe May 2017 #27
I follow her on Twitter JNelson6563 May 2017 #29
If you're truly indifferent lillypaddle May 2017 #32
I'm not posting about her. I'm posting about the reactions about her... JHB May 2017 #37
same here. i think blind trust in any ONE person/source is bad.... samnsara May 2017 #33
Que Sera, Sera HAB911 May 2017 #35
It's tough to consider her reporting as sensational and overboard Mr. Ected May 2017 #36
Shes a conduit... Ellipsis May 2017 #39
Count me in. smirkymonkey May 2017 #40
I'm in. Totally indifferent. n/t Different Drummer May 2017 #43
I'm here. I think she's getting "insider knowledge", it's just 2nd hand. Barack_America May 2017 #44
That's a good theory and very well said. emulatorloo May 2017 #45
I think so too - could be an ex intel lover for all we know womanofthehills May 2017 #49
I ignore all posts about her. Starry Messenger May 2017 #46
When her more vocal supporters try to win me over with how "patriotic" she is... SMC22307 May 2017 #48
I will wait and see. n/t murielm99 May 2017 #50
Louise who? GoneOffShore May 2017 #51
She is nutty, but I don't really care. wildeyed May 2017 #52
Who? liberalmuse May 2017 #53
I'm in TNLib May 2017 #54
Until it becomes mainstream with verification, then I pay little attention. pbmus May 2017 #55
Me indifferent. tibbiit May 2017 #56
I'm indefferent. Have been. NCTraveler May 2017 #57
I never heard of her before she showed up in posts here. Shandris May 2017 #58
She and Taylor have nice Twitter pictures Tiggeroshii May 2017 #59
Does take it with a grain of salt gldstwmn May 2017 #60
Pretty much. The baseline is a lack of inclination to ... JHB May 2017 #61
Count me in.... Dem_4_Life May 2017 #62
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Check-in for members of t...»Reply #56