Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Phoenix61

(18,782 posts)

5. Bank account numbers

Reply to bigtree (Original post)

Sat May 27, 2017, 09:30 AM

May 2017

This is all about the money. Before Twitler was president it was much easier for him to launder money and make loan payments to the Russians. Presidential tax returns are automatically audited. I'm guessing by senior, unbribable, very, very good forensic accountants. He couldn't run the money through normal channels so...back channel conversations to set up back channel bank accounts.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

16 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Mind-blowing commentary from Jack Rice and Malcolm Nance on Morning Joy [View all] bigtree May 2017 OP

Watching malaise May 2017 #1

digging on our Morning Joy! bigtree May 2017 #3

More like what to get FROM the Russians. MineralMan May 2017 #2

Quid pro quo. Mme. Defarge May 2017 #4

Bank account numbers Phoenix61 May 2017 #5

Phoenix Wawannabe May 2017 #7

This is really getting frightening... Satch59 May 2017 #6

What is so disgusting about this --- Grammy23 May 2017 #10

A recruited, trained and operating spy ring for Russia in the White House Greybnk48 May 2017 #8

THERE CAN BE NO INNOCENT Mme. Defarge May 2017 #9

But . . . . Hillary's E-mails!! no_hypocrisy May 2017 #11

The truth is, the IC probably already knows the content of those conversations Mr. Ected May 2017 #12

Deliberate and calculated leaks when investigations reach stage where they won't compromise inquiry L. Coyote May 2017 #15

He certainly can't claim that it was just an perfectly innocent request to use procon May 2017 #13

that's key bigtree May 2017 #14

Its coming Apart peggysue2 May 2017 #16