Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

StevieM

(10,578 posts)
6. If there was a TPR then they almost certainly know who she is.
Sun May 28, 2017, 11:58 PM
May 2017

She was still their legal mother, even when they were in foster care. Her name would be included in the adoption papers.

And the odds of any first mother not wanting contact with their biological children are low. Adoptive children generally do not come from mothers who simply were not interested in parenting. They usually come from mothers who were forced to give up their children due to being in dire financial circumstances and forced to accept a permanent solution to a temporary problem.

I firmly believe that adopted children benefit from contact with their blood relatives, and especially their natural mother.

And, yes, I believe in the concept of "the primal wound." I think the pain that many adoptees feel is legitimate, and if an adopted child is struggling then a reunion with their biological family should be strongly considered as a possible method of helping them heal.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Hurts the child, hurts the mother... Wounded Bear May 2017 #1
I'm not sure you can confidentally assume PoindexterOglethorpe May 2017 #2
I disagree. That incident happened when she was very young and it makes perfect sense to me StevieM May 2017 #3
You are making a lot of assumptions you have no way of knowing. LisaL May 2017 #4
If there was a TPR then they almost certainly know who she is. StevieM May 2017 #6
Where are your links for that? pnwmom May 2017 #11
I have to disagree with you Stevie. Stonepounder May 2017 #8
you have an old-timey idea about child development/mental health mopinko May 2017 #19
You seem to have an old-fashioned idea about who the birth mother is in our society. StevieM May 2017 #20
Meh.... Adrahil May 2017 #5
I am not saying that adoptees cannot be kind and loving people. StevieM May 2017 #7
This child isn't just "struggling" MichMary May 2017 #15
I presonally think... Adrahil May 2017 #21
I am a child protection defense attorney. no_hypocrisy May 2017 #9
Amen!!! uponit7771 May 2017 #10
Congratulations on the wonderful job you did!! It is so nice to hear a story with a happy ending. StevieM May 2017 #13
You are omitting some relevant info MichMary May 2017 #12
I disagree. I think she suffered a "primal wound," as it is called. Reuniting her with her mother StevieM May 2017 #14
This isn't just a "primal wound" MichMary May 2017 #16
The same family adopted the older half-sister MichMary May 2017 #17
Different people process things in different ways. StevieM May 2017 #18
Per the article, it is possible that condition is hereditary and hard-wired into brain. LisaL May 2017 #22
Then why not arrange a reunion and see what happens? Why not see what benefits it could offer? StevieM May 2017 #23
Sometimes meeting the birth mother isn't a good thing MichMary May 2017 #24
Anyone of us could have died at some previous point, but statistically we are all more likely to be StevieM May 2017 #25
I agree that being taken from your parent can be devastating and life-altering. Chemisse May 2017 #31
Has it occured to you that the birth mother B2G May 2017 #26
I think being separated from her children is probably the birth mother's biggest problem in life. StevieM May 2017 #27
Ted Bundy was a classic sociopath Freddie May 2017 #28
And there are other serial killers, like David Berkowitz, who were adopted. StevieM May 2017 #29
I was actually pretty offended by the Atlantic article janterry May 2017 #30
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Separating a child from i...»Reply #6