Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

(4,377 posts)

7. Even setting aside the unconstitutionality of it

Mon May 29, 2017, 01:18 AM

May 2017

Even as a theoretical it's an awful idea. The right wing would paint it as a coup, and it would pollute everything about the investigations/trials.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

15 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Who would be in charge? [View all] Stinky The Clown May 2017 OP

by rights, it should be Hillary. 5X May 2017 #1

Even setting aside the unconstitutionality of it Kentonio May 2017 #7

There are probably a couple madamesilverspurs May 2017 #3

It would probably come down to Louis Gohmert. femmocrat May 2017 #4

Idea? outrigger May 2017 #5

To your point: Stinky The Clown May 2017 #8

1947 Succession Act outrigger May 2017 #9

Welcome to DU, Outrigger. :) This stuff is quite common Hortensis May 2017 #10

Louise Mensch, I think oberliner May 2017 #11

The limit is the time remaining until the next congressional election. MineralMan May 2017 #12

Can we? outrigger May 2017 #13

We must deal with 2018 first, and that means working locally. MineralMan May 2017 #14