General Discussion

DemocratSinceBirth

(101,869 posts)

127. There's an implicit suggestion she's a vagabond.

Tue May 30, 2017, 05:57 AM

May 2017

She was born in Illinois and moved to Arkansas, Washington D.C, and then New York. That means two of the three places she moved to were because of her husband's job.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

145 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Q: Should Hillary return to the Senate in 2018? [View all] kristopher May 2017 OP

No. Kentonio May 2017 #1

How do you feel about Bernie running again when this term is up? nt JTFrog May 2017 #45

That's his decision to make. Vermont is his home state and he has served them loyally for many years Kentonio May 2017 #49

Lol! JTFrog May 2017 #50

I'm confused by why you think there's any comparison Kentonio May 2017 #51

Lol. JTFrog May 2017 #55

Well you're the one creating a Sanders comparison Kentonio May 2017 #58

Because I know there is nothing that would make you say Sanders shouldn't and nothing JTFrog May 2017 #60

Not really, I just think we have a broad field of talent in the party Kentonio May 2017 #62

I agree with you....... kerry-is-my-prez May 2017 #82

There is NO comparison - Hillary is far more qualified. This isn't about seniority. Lil Missy May 2017 #142

I'd call 8 terms in the house and many years of mayoral experience Kentonio May 2017 #145

And how would he run again? As a Democrat? Or independent? Green? Lil Missy May 2017 #143

I agree janterry May 2017 #126

did she say she wanted to? i'm pretty sure i heard her say multiple times that all she wanted to be La Lioness Priyanka May 2017 #2

When a woman says no, do people respect that? bettyellen May 2017 #9

No kidding Blue_Adept May 2017 #14

Yeah, but asking if she wants to run for Senate lets people express ehrnst May 2017 #18

Yeah and why would be let an opportunity to bash a real democrat La Lioness Priyanka May 2017 #29

Yah. (nt) ehrnst May 2017 #32

First Dem President and Congress should put there on the SCOTUS. nikibatts May 2017 #3

Absolutely NOT L. Coyote May 2017 #16

Good god NO!! choie May 2017 #4

I'm tired of dynasties. OrwellwasRight May 2017 #39

Amen. Kentonio May 2017 #41

I like Joe Kennedy III JNelson6563 May 2017 #54

I like him too, but I don't want him running for President. OrwellwasRight May 2017 #63

Wow. Ok. JNelson6563 May 2017 #66

Closed mindedness? OrwellwasRight May 2017 #67

Hold on there my intellectually gymnastic friend. JNelson6563 May 2017 #68

Ah yes, those poor hard done by political families Kentonio May 2017 #69

No, I don't think we should assume they are the best because of where they come from. OrwellwasRight May 2017 #70

Where do I assume ANYONE is "best"? JNelson6563 May 2017 #74

Wow talk about logical leaps! OrwellwasRight May 2017 #75

Wow. Ok. JNelson6563 May 2017 #81

Me too. He is my fav of the young upcoming Dems. mhw May 2017 #65

Love him too. There is something about the Kennedys. For anyone who was old enough, it was kerry-is-my-prez May 2017 #83

Of course. They throw out Labels with nothing to back it up. mhw May 2017 #86

Competency &electability are more important than relatives Alice11111 May 2017 #105

Lol Lotusflower70 May 2017 #112

Well, that kind of weed I'd vote for. OrwellwasRight May 2017 #113

I know right Lotusflower70 May 2017 #115

I'm all for the most qualified Democrat, don't care about last names. Lil Missy May 2017 #144

I agree. I supported Hillary in the General, donated to Hillary, voted for Hillary, but Still In Wisconsin May 2017 #103

Same. However, if she is the most electable, I'll fall in line. Alice11111 May 2017 #107

Oh, I totally agree. Still In Wisconsin May 2017 #108

No. By not running for office, she's free to speak her mind. nt oasis May 2017 #5

I love Hillary but this question isn't realistic. NY has a terrific senator, Kirsten Gilibrand, who StevieM May 2017 #6

plus gillibrand is her protege and in no world would she undercut her protege La Lioness Priyanka May 2017 #10

Yes!! Alabama! awesomerwb1 May 2017 #7

Please. In the name of all that's Holy... Jacquette May 2017 #8

What's with all the insulting animus? Skidmore May 2017 #11

In what universe is my question "insulting animus"? kristopher May 2017 #12

Well the minute you cast her as a candidate, knives come out so I suppose they bettyellen May 2017 #20

Bingo Hekate May 2017 #34

Exactly, and the baiting reference about which state she should chose R B Garr May 2017 #46

She has worked for others her entire life, she should do whatever brings her joy. onecaliberal May 2017 #73

She should wait for the next Dem to appoint her to the SCOTUS Tiggeroshii May 2017 #13

In what way is she the most qualified progressive jurist in the country? Kentonio May 2017 #42

She would be an EXCELLENT justice. american_ideals May 2017 #44

I don't need to watch it. Kentonio May 2017 #48

HRC would be perfect. Several arguments below. american_ideals May 2017 #64

No we don't need to have a 70 something year old Supreme Court nominee book_worm May 2017 #97

No crazycatlady May 2017 #15

I should have made it clear in the OP: Who said anything about New York? kristopher May 2017 #19

People don't like a carpetbagger crazycatlady May 2017 #21

But she won, didn't she. kristopher May 2017 #22

The problem is that the Senate works on seniority --- and she would be a 70 year old Freshman karynnj May 2017 #25

Wow, I hope you regret voting GOP. They suck in NY. bettyellen May 2017 #35

I haven't voted for any Republican since crazycatlady May 2017 #90

So you think Hillary was a carpet bagger out to further her career, okay. bettyellen May 2017 #91

So you voted for that sawed off jagoff Lazio? Lol. That's genius!! Hassin Bin Sober May 2017 #71

I was 20 then crazycatlady May 2017 #89

So you were uniformed but still need to stick to the "ambitious carpetbagger" crap you fell for? bettyellen May 2017 #92

You do realize I grew up and voted for her reelection crazycatlady May 2017 #93

It wasn't clear that you regretted the vote- since you framed her candidacy in such a negative light bettyellen May 2017 #94

My point was that when her first campaign happened crazycatlady May 2017 #95

This thread is a trainwreck. The knives are out. Be careful. Voltaire2 May 2017 #128

I have voted in every election since 1978 and never pulled the lever for a Republican. DemocratSinceBirth May 2017 #121

Hillary was my senator, lapucelle May 2017 #76

I can't figure out HarmonyRockets May 2017 #23

The state I see Hillary Clinton running in 2018 is California. nkpolitics1212 May 2017 #30

You again. How's the office pool these days? Tell me WHY California would want to... Hekate May 2017 #33

HRC would never challenge a sitting Democratic Senator. Now if Feinstein, who has announced book_worm May 2017 #102

Sure, because Tennesseans would *absolutely* welcome a carpetbagger. SMC22307 May 2017 #37

As I point out in a later post most of those states that she could possibly win book_worm May 2017 #98

Has she stated that she wants to? ehrnst May 2017 #17

Good gawd, enough! Iggo May 2017 #24

if she runs for office again it would be for Governor of ny and I doubt she would. hrmjustin May 2017 #26

"...it would be fired Governor of my..." SMC22307 May 2017 #36

Damn Autocorrect! hrmjustin May 2017 #40

I figured that's what you meant in your corrected version... SMC22307 May 2017 #43

f*cking repugs would target her for everything.. shes safer OUT of office! samnsara May 2017 #27

She was a great Senator. But she's said she doesn't want to. Squinch May 2017 #28

I think Hillary's greatest accomplishment will be leading the Resistance Tatiana May 2017 #31

No,She lives in n New York. Demsrule86 May 2017 #38

Post removed Post removed May 2017 #47

Errrr I mean grooming her for her destiny. LenaBaby61 May 2017 #52

"Foisted" by his own petard. lapucelle May 2017 #56

No... LovingA2andMI May 2017 #53

My impression is that she's done and content to undertake political advocacy. Akoto May 2017 #57

She says she doesn't want to run Progressive dog May 2017 #59

Hillary is free to do whatever she chooses. She would be welcomed as Senator or anything else. mhw May 2017 #61

I have every expectation that Hillary will lapucelle May 2017 #72

It'd be awkward for her to run from anywhere but NY. Calista241 May 2017 #77

Sure. Her super intelligent voice and ideas would be a tremendous asset to a stagnant Congress. democratisphere May 2017 #78

No. aintitfunny May 2017 #79

Absolutely yes. Why not. We have 70 yr olds running for DC Seats & mhw May 2017 #80

What state? What sitting Dem Senator will she challenge? book_worm May 2017 #99

Wa? Well if that's all that is standing in her way? I''m betting the mhw May 2017 #106

God....Please no.... bluecollar2 May 2017 #84

Well, sure thats what trump & putin told everyone. mhw May 2017 #111

It's a moot question since she indicated she's done. ATL Ebony May 2017 #85

Apart from shit stirring, is there a point to the OP? onenote May 2017 #87

There is none, the OP doesn't even give their opinion of what state book_worm May 2017 #100

See Post 120. DemocratSinceBirth May 2017 #122

No, she seems to be doing fine as is Bradical79 May 2017 #88

There is no state for her to run in book_worm May 2017 #96

YES !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! trueblue2007 May 2017 #101

What state? book_worm May 2017 #104

Hillary will find a place that allows her to speak freely & finally be heard mhw May 2017 #109

She doesn't need to run to speak freely. onenote May 2017 #110

?!! Sorry. mhw May 2017 #114

Do you seriously think she's going to try to unseat Gillibrand? onenote May 2017 #118

Pretty sure you blew right past my post : mhw May 2017 #119

I read when you said she wouldn't challenge another Democrat onenote May 2017 #123

Geezuz its a hypothetical. What if Bill decided to run? Or what if.. mhw May 2017 #124

No. Others have already made PoindexterOglethorpe May 2017 #116

Why the hell not - she should do whatever she wants. She would be a great voice for us nt Laura PourMeADrink May 2017 #117

Hmmm DemocratSinceBirth May 2017 #120

Lol. No shit! Here fishy. Have some delicious Bait! mhw May 2017 #125

There's an implicit suggestion she's a vagabond. DemocratSinceBirth May 2017 #127

Discredit censor discredit..when falsehoods are all one has. mhw May 2017 #129

If it wasn't for the vagaries of our electoral system she would be president. DemocratSinceBirth May 2017 #130

Makes ya wonder doesn't it. mhw May 2017 #131

I wonder why somebody here had to take a shot at her. DemocratSinceBirth May 2017 #132

Guess they still hold a fear that if she isn't continually discredited she will STILL be a powerful mhw May 2017 #133

She would have made a good president. DemocratSinceBirth May 2017 #134

HRC's direction for America: This is what Some still don't want others to know about Hillary.. mhw May 2017 #137

You're making me sad thinking about what might have been. DemocratSinceBirth May 2017 #138

Rightfully so. It is a tragedy on every scale. mhw May 2017 #140

If she'll still have us, sure. Orsino May 2017 #135

No. New York already has two fine Senators. GBizzle May 2017 #136

Good gawd no! Is a faux pas to go back DOWN the ladder. No, no, no!!!! Lil Missy May 2017 #139

Her voice is needed more now than ever before mhw May 2017 #141