Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Why not go for the Senator with the #1 progressive record? InAbLuEsTaTe May 2017 #1
She ranks highest because she just started in January -- few votes to be counted. pnwmom May 2017 #2
But for those of us in California padfun May 2017 #151
I like her a lot. But that has nothing to do with my feeling pnwmom May 2017 #154
My concern with him..... MyOwnPeace May 2017 #3
Except that he voted against her Senate confirmation. n/t pnwmom May 2017 #6
That's good, but........ MyOwnPeace May 2017 #8
Newark schools were in terrible shape. Trying vouchers wasn't an awful pnwmom May 2017 #20
Doesn't everybody have a "+" and "-" list? MyOwnPeace May 2017 #39
Sure. But the people who falsely say he is not a progressive pnwmom May 2017 #89
You had to try something. Demsrule86 May 2017 #147
Read the WHOLE story, not just select quotes. Remember, he was mayor of New Jersey's largest city.. George II May 2017 #41
George II MyOwnPeace May 2017 #62
Booker invited Christie to go on that tour of Newark, and he proposed that Christie work with him. George II May 2017 #64
Booker had no choice but to work with the Governor. Newark is not a wealthy city pnwmom May 2017 #91
That is true rpannier May 2017 #18
He voted against DeVos's confirmation pnwmom May 2017 #21
Booker will never be pure enough for the purists. Mars and Minerva May 2017 #38
It hardly pays to argue with the bumper sticker crowd rpannier May 2017 #65
No one is pure enough for the purist because if they were honest...they just don't like Democrats. Demsrule86 May 2017 #132
And most of them aren't New Jersey voters. Mars and Minerva Jun 2017 #175
That is true rpannier May 2017 #56
Charters are fine in my state because they get the same funding pnwmom May 2017 #88
The problem with charter schools doesn't change angrychair May 2017 #98
I'm proud of my two votes for him JustAnotherGen May 2017 #47
Good for you rpannier May 2017 #58
Very good. fleabiscuit May 2017 #60
Dumping someone over one issue treestar May 2017 #141
Ooops...in the immortal words of Emily Litela, "never mind"! Thanks for pointing that out. George II May 2017 #35
Hey! MyOwnPeace May 2017 #43
Off topic, but the sad part of that was several botched diagnoses in the course of her illness. George II May 2017 #46
But......... MyOwnPeace May 2017 #66
He did vote against Devos which is to his credit dsc May 2017 #169
It's been disheartening, to say the least mcar May 2017 #4
Not sure they are committed as many of us really are about tRump Crime Family. FarPoint May 2017 #30
Remember when he essentially recommended Obama be nicer to Wall Street? vi5 May 2017 #5
I agree completely with there being too much Phoenix61 May 2017 #9
+1 rpannier May 2017 #19
Ohhhh FarPoint May 2017 #40
No... vi5 May 2017 #122
There are people who come here murielm99 May 2017 #7
Exactly! FarPoint May 2017 #31
Or even blatantly misrepresent articles about Democrats or what Democrats say. George II May 2017 #42
Yup... sheshe2 May 2017 #54
Nailed it. nt fleabiscuit May 2017 #61
Amen! JustAnotherGen May 2017 #67
+1000 brer cat May 2017 #77
They sound robotic...a.comeback to everything Alice11111 May 2017 #81
You are correct. And that's sad. NurseJackie May 2017 #104
They are not that hard to spot...doom and gloom...and no Democrat meets their standards...and most Demsrule86 May 2017 #145
+1 uponit7771 May 2017 #171
The Kushners hosted fundraisers for Booker and he attended their wedding. 50 Shades Of Blue May 2017 #10
The Clintons attended canetoad May 2017 #13
So... FarPoint May 2017 #15
That really bothered me, as does the Clintons associating with Kissinger. 50 Shades Of Blue May 2017 #53
And sharing the planet. fleabiscuit May 2017 #63
It's sad that any Democrat is OK with Kissinger. 50 Shades Of Blue May 2017 #82
I'm not asking for anyone here to be my moral compass, and don't look to BS for his bs. fleabiscuit May 2017 #103
It is sad the some Democrats demonize other Democrats because of who they might know...Kissinger has Demsrule86 May 2017 #148
Let's be fair, its more than just "knowing" Kissinger in this case. This is tricky territory though, JCanete May 2017 #157
I don't consider Kissinger as awful as the rest of you...they were all like that back in the day. Demsrule86 May 2017 #168
He asked to please come as a favor, then he stabs them Alice11111 May 2017 #85
So? Trump was a prominent New Yorker and may have been a Dem back then... Demsrule86 May 2017 #140
Kushner had been a lifelong Democrat. Would you expect Booker pnwmom May 2017 #25
It was obvious what the Kushners were because they still are - scum. 50 Shades Of Blue May 2017 #50
So what... FarPoint May 2017 #32
They're foul creeps, that's what. 50 Shades Of Blue May 2017 #49
It doesn't give him a reason... Demsrule86 May 2017 #133
WTH? treestar May 2017 #144
He was a lifelong Democrat but he has left the party and joined the Trump team. pnwmom May 2017 #163
Corey Booker does not walk on water and if we can not scrutinize his record what are we? 58Sunliner May 2017 #11
We need to stay focused and united... FarPoint May 2017 #14
Mostly, yes.&Comey. We need to be able examine our own Alice11111 May 2017 #84
We just have to embrace what we got at the moment... FarPoint May 2017 #120
Yes, we are. Alice11111 May 2017 #164
Good for our site...there is way too much of what you describe, and it cost us the 16 election... Demsrule86 May 2017 #143
You may not SEE the Repubs examining themselves, but Alice11111 May 2017 #166
No they don't...the don't worry about what is wrong with themselves...they only point out our faults Demsrule86 May 2017 #167
Scrutinizing his record is fine. Distorting it is not. The people who pretend pnwmom May 2017 #23
I have not seen this distortion, only people questioning his judgment and worrying about the optics 58Sunliner May 2017 #110
He's calling for an immediate investigation. He didn't say NO pnwmom May 2017 #111
Kushner and his whole family were lifelong Democrats-lifelong weasels. 58Sunliner May 2017 #170
It's one thing to scrutinize his record, it's another (not you) to distort his record. George II May 2017 #44
Do it next year JustAnotherGen May 2017 #51
I did notice a lot of Kim G. signs out there today... Else You Are Mad May 2017 #80
I noticed JustAnotherGen May 2017 #119
I appreciate that, but do you really think CB has a problem with being out of touch with his base on 58Sunliner May 2017 #109
You mean multiple postings JustAnotherGen May 2017 #118
Actually I mean multiple postings from Booker's supporters that en masse are an effort to shut 58Sunliner May 2017 #173
Unfair bashing is NOT scrutinizing ... wow ... how many times do we have to post this?!!? uponit7771 May 2017 #68
Unfair bashing?? I am critical of his comments about not impeaching or revoking/suspending 58Sunliner May 2017 #108
Did you read Booker's exact words and the context? He's an attorney, a smart attorney, and... George II May 2017 #152
CNN: Cory Booker: 'The Russians are coming, what are we going to do about it?' TomCADem May 2017 #96
Democrats must stop eating their own and there is no need to bash Democrats , we have Demsrule86 May 2017 #135
He is ahead of Bernie on that list treestar May 2017 #146
I'm with you on this... FarPoint May 2017 #12
Yeah, the compulsion to condemn people on our side geek tragedy May 2017 #16
And sometimes obsessive. George II May 2017 #94
I won't trash any progressive elmac May 2017 #17
Of course he's not perfect but there does Cha May 2017 #22
We want better Democrats HarmonyRockets May 2017 #112
Then deal in reality.. Cory Booker isn't Cha May 2017 #113
no person is perfect...we vote for the candidate with the D next to his name in elections or Demsrule86 May 2017 #136
There are things I like about Corey Booker and some things I don't. aikoaiko May 2017 #24
He represents Jersey...this is a state where jobs depend on Wall Street...same Demsrule86 May 2017 #137
He's an operator. What's hard to figure about that? Demit May 2017 #26
That says it all. 50 Shades Of Blue May 2017 #55
You're entitled to your opinion, and we are able to determine our own facts. fleabiscuit May 2017 #69
Link and quote him being "for himself"? tia uponit7771 May 2017 #70
Thanks so much for this, pnwmom. I get so sick of kneejerk kneecapping of Democrats by Dems. Hekate May 2017 #27
I am too. You're not alone. NurseJackie May 2017 #28
Isn't that the exact thing Russian robos did on Facebook MiddleClass May 2017 #37
But remember... GulfCoast66 May 2017 #97
I don't know much about him. He's not well known nationally. Honeycombe8 May 2017 #29
Yep. Either the Russians or the GOP are out early sabotaging democratic applegrove May 2017 #33
There are some very impressive Progressives in the top 10 of that list. George II May 2017 #34
Clever melman May 2017 #59
Sen Booker is getting the Hillary treatment... TheDebbieDee May 2017 #36
Politico - The Russians Are Coming. Again. TomCADem May 2017 #74
They've already targeted Elizabeth Warren? HarmonyRockets May 2017 #114
And who benefits from stoking the fires between conservadems and progressives? TheDebbieDee May 2017 #121
Unfortunately the smearing isn't coming only from Russian trolls, but wolves in Democrats' clothing. George II May 2017 #160
Trolls never sleep n/t billh58 May 2017 #45
This message was self-deleted by its author larry budwell May 2017 #48
Hey folks! You still have time WellDarn May 2017 #52
The purists strike again. hrmjustin May 2017 #57
Not only that but it looks like purist bullshit unfair bashing and record distortions !! uponit7771 May 2017 #71
Yep! Some that don't wish us DEMS well -are bent on coming here to sabotage our party & leaders. Madam45for2923 May 2017 #72
I agree... This is divide and conquer stuff! You would think we at DU TheDebbieDee May 2017 #76
Balked on big pharma and Kushner talking-liberally May 2017 #73
Calling for A Full Investigation of Trump's Family Is Defending Kushner? TomCADem May 2017 #75
I would suggest a little research on drug Bill. Hoyt May 2017 #79
So would I melman May 2017 #117
He didn't "balk on big pharma." Like the two progressive Senators in my state, pnwmom May 2017 #100
I don't fucking believe them ismnotwasm May 2017 #78
If you are talking about the thread I posted yesterday, MelissaB May 2017 #83
There have been many posts on different topics over the years. pnwmom May 2017 #86
As I just posted in the other thread, his answer ticked me off & MelissaB May 2017 #92
As you should. Don't let anyone bully you away from your position. WoonTars May 2017 #87
It's not fair to ignore his progressive voting record pnwmom May 2017 #93
I think that's one of my worries. He's too eager to compromise in order to "get things done"... WoonTars May 2017 #99
Look at his actual voting record and tell me where he has compromised too much. n/t pnwmom May 2017 #101
His drug vote for a start... WoonTars May 2017 #102
Yes. It's just about his Senate record. That's where he is now pnwmom May 2017 #105
Look up. nt fleabiscuit May 2017 #106
Come 20120 Plucketeer May 2017 #90
LOL. Very true. n/t pnwmom May 2017 #95
Meme of Corey Booker tonight should be sverchki (crickets in russian). applegrove May 2017 #107
Nothing to see here HarmonyRockets May 2017 #115
Do you understand that Kushner was a lifelong Democrat till pnwmom May 2017 #116
LOL NurseJackie May 2017 #123
By the way WellDarn May 2017 #124
This message was self-deleted by its author NurseJackie May 2017 #126
Our states voters approved charter schools and there's nothing wrong with them. pnwmom May 2017 #127
I've heard all the excuses on Big Pharma WellDarn May 2017 #142
Sorry he is giving cover to a traitor. moda253 May 2017 #125
Not at all. He's said we need to get to the bottom of this and specifically pnwmom May 2017 #129
Sorry he said what he said and it came off as giving cover moda253 May 2017 #130
We have no power to impeach anyone...so Booker is right in some ways...it can't happen until the GOP Demsrule86 May 2017 #139
No he is not...and I question your motivation for saying such a thing. Demsrule86 May 2017 #149
Post removed Post removed May 2017 #128
Booker is being pre-emptively smeared in preparation TheDebbieDee May 2017 #131
Nailed it. You are correct. NurseJackie May 2017 #150
+1000 Proud Liberal Dem May 2017 #134
People are thrashing Senator Booker BECAUSE he's a strong progressive. L. Coyote May 2017 #138
Booker is a great senator Gothmog May 2017 #153
It should be pointed out, that the calculations are based not on identifying progressive versus JCanete May 2017 #155
All you have to do is look at the other information on the site pnwmom May 2017 #156
how do I see the specific votes that were included? I see the breakdown of categories, but not JCanete May 2017 #158
First you click on the general category of the issue, pnwmom May 2017 #159
thanks! JCanete May 2017 #161
After looking at the specific votes of those, like Sanders, who occasionally breaks with the JCanete May 2017 #162
He is fine staying in the Senate... tallahasseedem May 2017 #165
You're entitled to your opinion, but many people in NJ disagree with you. n/t pnwmom May 2017 #172
It's not an opinion when you know what baggage will come out. tallahasseedem May 2017 #174
That probably depends on your definition of "progressive". whathehell Jun 2017 #176
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Don't believe the people ...»Reply #131