Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

What are the ramifications of this? Are they attempting to ban birth control? NoWheyJose May 2017 #1
Re: Are they attempting to ban birth control? SFnomad May 2017 #18
They want to make birth control expensive for women, Ilsa May 2017 #23
I worked for a Fortune 100 firm until 2000 and birth control was not covered in our insurance plan. SharonAnn May 2017 #38
I don't know of many companies that covered radical noodle May 2017 #46
Yes. Read the HLA plank that has been included in the GOP platform for decades. Warren DeMontague May 2017 #25
Same for IUDs, and hormonal contraceptives of any sort LeftyMom May 2017 #44
At the core, they're all religious arguments. Warren DeMontague May 2017 #50
Condoms are allowed drmeow Jun 2017 #57
Interesting theory. Warren DeMontague Jun 2017 #58
But these are (mostly) men drmeow Jun 2017 #60
I'm sure that's part of it. Warren DeMontague Jun 2017 #63
The religious right doesn't compromise. Girard442 May 2017 #2
Yes get the red out May 2017 #8
Just one more thing to file under: "But Hillary is no different from Trump!!!" Blue_Tires May 2017 #3
But they still have to cover Vigara, right? sinkingfeeling May 2017 #4
Well yeah, boner meds aredifferentdon't you know? LOL irisblue May 2017 #5
Off topic, but . . . NoWheyJose May 2017 #6
Good one! deurbano May 2017 #26
My insurance doesn't . Viagra is medicinal for a medical condition Ohioblue22 May 2017 #11
There are husbands who are glad for birth control. So it isn't just for women. Demit May 2017 #14
Mainly the poster said that Viagra was covered by insurance and I Ohioblue22 May 2017 #15
Well, you plainly said Viagra isn't the same as birth control. Demit May 2017 #20
Well like i said Viagra isn't covered by insurance b.c. is . Idk why people Ohioblue22 May 2017 #24
Obviously you don't want to address my question. Demit May 2017 #32
I have. apparently it doesn't fit the answer you expected Ohioblue22 May 2017 #34
Totally knew what you meant... Charlotte Little May 2017 #52
Dude, you don't know much about BC, do you? justiceischeap May 2017 #19
Medicare Part D explicitely doesn't cover drugs used to treat sexual or erectile dysfunction progree May 2017 #28
True, but many HMOs do with a higher copay. sinkingfeeling May 2017 #43
Your link got chopped off. Thanks, good article. Here's the link progree May 2017 #53
There are also wives who are not glad radical noodle May 2017 #47
I imagine that's true it's one of the reasons planned parenthood is so important Ohioblue22 May 2017 #49
Yes! I never went to Planned Parenthood radical noodle Jun 2017 #55
Well, hell yeah that is about the almighty man. Doreen May 2017 #30
Days of the Theocracy by Kristin Lems no_hypocrisy May 2017 #7
The endless march of the RW to take us back to the 19th Century... Wounded Bear May 2017 #9
If this happens, the Democratic Party should take both the house and senate Freethinker65 May 2017 #10
SHOULD, yes. But will they? FiveGoodMen May 2017 #12
I think this might do it, IF voters are able to vote and be countrd Freethinker65 May 2017 #16
Now in an equillibruim, if there are more births, $350,000 in taxes and costs per new add on. TheBlackAdder May 2017 #13
Bastards! smirkymonkey May 2017 #17
it is also because they want to spend less on medical care for women. By the time demigoddess May 2017 #21
I think it's at least as much about control, since pregnancy costs a lot more than birth control. deurbano May 2017 #27
And pregnancy is more dangerous radical noodle May 2017 #48
I'm old enough to remember when the "conservatives" Mariana May 2017 #22
We already have radical Christian terrorists in America... A theocracy will not change that. keithbvadu2 May 2017 #29
It's About Turning Back the Clock to Women as Chattel dlk May 2017 #31
Their new motto: cynical_idealist Jun 2017 #62
For about a year, my birth control pills were covered 100%. SCRUBDASHRUB May 2017 #33
In the ACA, I think they have to offer a drug/device in every contraceptive classification for free progree May 2017 #41
Some of the right wingers see birth leftyladyfrommo May 2017 #35
Anything to protect the group of cells, but still.. fuck the actual baby. Amimnoch May 2017 #36
The anti-abortion debate is about controlling bodies: woman *and* men Dorn May 2017 #37
It has now gotten to the point where... Alt-Orange May 2017 #39
It's all about white babies. roamer65 May 2017 #40
I disagree; I think it's quite the opposite flibbitygiblets May 2017 #42
Impoverished women aren't using private insurance leftstreet May 2017 #45
It also PROVES the Republicans have been lying to the people for decades! They claim to be against napi21 May 2017 #51
Where the hell are reasonable men in this MontanaMama May 2017 #54
THANK YOU. nt raccoon Jun 2017 #59
Are we ruled by fanatical Catholic men? Ha! What am I thinking?! We're ruled by GREEDY men! WinkyDink Jun 2017 #56
"days of the theocracy" kristin lems niyad Jun 2017 #61
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»We tried to warn you - fi...»Reply #9