Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Susan Sarandon Explains The Positives for Progressives of President Trump [View all]Demsrule86
(71,542 posts)144. Ah...we came damn close to losing our Republic during the great depression.
And I doubt we could withstand another...you know by most estimates five million people died in the early days of the great depression right? I don't see how any self respecting progressive could wish that upon anyone. I would think folks who are very privileged like Sarandon might see that as a good plan...However, the rest of us not so much...I have little desire to see my family and friends starve.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
179 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Susan Sarandon Explains The Positives for Progressives of President Trump [View all]
TomCADem
Jun 2017
OP
It's a metaphor to remember because the revolution was telling women and POC to wait too....
bettyellen
Jun 2017
#4
The VANITY of "destroy to rebuild" ... she ignores the LIVES that will be lost. She's so STUPID!!
NurseJackie
Jun 2017
#63
She's the anti-Cassandra: wrong about everything that's going to happen in the future.
betsuni
Jun 2017
#15
exactly, not a gamble I was okay with taking myself, but I understand the logic, which is not
JCanete
Jun 2017
#18
"Pain and suffering is coming anyway"? Excuse me, Hillary was NOT the lesser of the two evils.
still_one
Jun 2017
#34
The odds are if those self-identified progressives who refused to vote for Hillary, had pulled their
still_one
Jun 2017
#44
no it isn't false equivalency. I think we're headed off a cliff. The democrats often tac us...
JCanete
Jun 2017
#71
gee, only two things. How sad. The Iran nuclear deal, opening relations with Cuba, preventing a
still_one
Jun 2017
#81
Saving the american car industry isn't progress, its staving off disaster that was the result of
JCanete
Jun 2017
#91
We passed the ACA on party lines. That means it wasn't better because of people in our own party.
JCanete
Jun 2017
#159
Yes...the Stupak amendment cost us single payer and yet Sen.Sander endorsed a guy who bragged about
Demsrule86
Jun 2017
#162
Yes, the argument is precisely that she would rather have more pain and suffering versus less.
DanTex
Jun 2017
#51
She forgets history. Too much "pain and suffering", people get lined up against a wall.
haele
Jun 2017
#70
She obviously has. I'd love to tell her that with her being an actress, the firts thing that comes
lunamagica
Jun 2017
#87
I disagree with you. It is that situation. Democrats have not taken on the forces that have
JCanete
Jun 2017
#74
i don't think the view is that things are so bad they can't get worse. At least it wasn't mine when
JCanete
Jun 2017
#80
I think the argument of mine you are missing, is that the Democrats aren't effectively taking on big
JCanete
Jun 2017
#93
I don't see how that has anything to do with Sarandon's justification for supporting Trump.
DanTex
Jun 2017
#94
Fair enough. I was talking about ways in which the Democrats have not been doing the right
JCanete
Jun 2017
#96
I only disagree with what you say by degrees. Its complicated and I appreciate your arguments.
JCanete
Jun 2017
#113
oh, to this point...I actually think there are a couple things that are harder to come back from. I
JCanete
Jun 2017
#102
That is a check you privlege argument and the willingness to sacrifice others is quite astounding
Demsrule86
Jun 2017
#59
Thank you...I can't stand people who sacrifice others for their ideology...which is what the
Demsrule86
Jun 2017
#112
what about when people sacrifice people, to the tune of 100,000 for political expedience? nt
JCanete
Jun 2017
#115
how about anybody who voted for the Iraq invasion, which killed 100,000 Iraqis.
JCanete
Jun 2017
#158
Hahah...you mean like most Democrats who were there at the time? A big who cares.
Demsrule86
Jun 2017
#163
no fucking way. There were plenty of people telling the truth at the time, in the know, and calling
JCanete
Jun 2017
#171
all of this was in the context of you saying you can't understand people sacrificing people for
JCanete
Jun 2017
#178
no it isn't. It would be if you thought choosing a different path would be better for those who
JCanete
Jun 2017
#75
she doesn't give a damn about others suffering...she needs a revolution so she can feel alive...
Demsrule86
Jun 2017
#111
That's not the idea I'm putting out there. People are being crushed, perpetually. Trump comes along
JCanete
Jun 2017
#114
I always think that those who hold this view are those who will not be affected, like SS
lunamagica
Jun 2017
#82
The so called left of left or whatever they call themselves share the GOP's indifference towards
Demsrule86
Jun 2017
#142
ICAM. I'm just baffled to encouner this coldness and indifference to the suffering of the most
lunamagica
Jun 2017
#160
Like I said, she's part of the Trump coalition, so it makes sense that people would talk about her.
DanTex
Jun 2017
#126
Well, this is a political message board, where people express opinions about political topics.
DanTex
Jun 2017
#133
Obviously, when I'm posting on DU, I'm not knocking on doors, and neither are you.
DanTex
Jun 2017
#135
"raving lunatics of the Bolshevik" - got any specific examples or is this just
KingCharlemagne
Jun 2017
#43
Yeah, she gets a giant tax cut if he gets his heinous tax bill through doesn't she?
Demsrule86
Jun 2017
#32
"the American public is learning a valuable lesson". What a bunch of bullshit. How many people
still_one
Jun 2017
#33
That is a straw man argument. When an accident occurs, a determination is done to find its cause,
still_one
Jun 2017
#60
Ah...we came damn close to losing our Republic during the great depression.
Demsrule86
Jun 2017
#144
No, democracy is on fire you fucking idiot. But hey, go make some of those champagne popsicles.
JTFrog
Jun 2017
#55
Ahhh... the voice of PRIVELEGE. So glad she can AFFORD the LUXURY of "destroy to rebuild".
NurseJackie
Jun 2017
#62
no mincing of words there Jackie. Her 50 million dollar net worth privelege that
still_one
Jun 2017
#66
She is a nut. She isn't the Cornell West stretchy eyes type of nut, but a nut none the less. nt
Blue_true
Jun 2017
#84
Do not care what she has to say, unless it is "I'm profoundly sorry for my stupidity."
6000eliot
Jun 2017
#92
Do you, or a child of yours (if you have any) depend on the ACA to stay alive?
lunamagica
Jun 2017
#98
Obviously they are ignorant, and they will pay for it. Many will pay for it with ther lives
lunamagica
Jun 2017
#100
Just as I figured you (hopefully) like SS will not be personally affected by this
lunamagica
Jun 2017
#103
Really? There is nothing to say to a post that thinks Trump is a good thing.
Demsrule86
Jun 2017
#145
I'm glad she came down from her tower to explain to the peons why "It's a good thing!"
RhodeIslandOne
Jun 2017
#105
I simply pointed out that Gandhi was willing to risk his life for the movement.
thucythucy
Jun 2017
#154
And this was two months ago! Just imagine what would happen if Colbert had her on again, now!
Warren DeMontague
Jun 2017
#107
the Colbert appearance was 2 months ago, when she was doing promos for her Bette Davis thing
Warren DeMontague
Jun 2017
#167