So they RIGGED our fucking election...HACKED our voting machines

[mythology]

33. If you're going to make an exceptional claim, you need to provide a citation

For example, I can cite the lack of statistical differences between counties in Wisconsin that hand recounted and those that machine recounted.

http://host.madison.com/wsj/news/local/govt-and-politics/dane-county-completes-presidential-election-recount-with-no-major-discrepancies/article_1d4c73a5-295e-591d-b945-344150125463.html

“No major discrepancies have been discovered,” McDonell said. “The election equipment and procedures have been (found)to be extremely secure and accurate.”

The state’s second-largest county, Dane was the largest to conduct a hand recount.

http://host.madison.com/wsj/news/local/govt-and-politics/completed-wisconsin-recount-widens-donald-trump-s-lead-by-votes/article_3f61c6ac-5b18-5c27-bf38-e537146bbcdd.html

http://host.madison.com/ct/news/local/govt-and-politics/election-matters/wisconsin-recount-reveals-small-change-in-vote-count-some-problems/article_545e11e2-16fe-5283-99ad-e6d87a893a3b.html

"We found no evidence of any hack, in terms of our computer infrastructure system," Thomsen said.

See, that's the difference. I can cite actual evidence from people who are actually involved in the system. You cite "multiple sources", but can't be bothered to actually provide them.

There is zero evidence of vote hacking. None. It's embarrassing that this nonsense is allowed. How is it any different than Republicans claiming in person voter fraud is a significant thing when there is no evidence for it? Facts matter.