Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

TheBlackAdder

(29,981 posts)

16. whatever

Reply to bettyellen (Reply #15)

Sun Jun 4, 2017, 07:52 AM

Jun 2017

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

26 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

The even more ridiculous right-wing talking-point that is replacing "Reps and Dems are equally bad." [View all] DetlefK Jun 2017 OP

Oligarchs made common cause with "social justice warriors" in the last presidential election? What bettyellen Jun 2017 #1

That's a quote from the article. I would have put it in italics, but that's not possible on DU. DetlefK Jun 2017 #3

So you don't understand it either....? But know that SJW is RW framing perjorative to slime liberals bettyellen Jun 2017 #4

The author uses 'oligarchs" for tech billionaires, ignoring that Trump is the biggest oligarch muriel_volestrangler Jun 2017 #17

I was thinking I'd need to print it and eliminate 2/3 of the adjectives - and all of the boring bettyellen Jun 2017 #20

First Griffin, then Maher. Is there a pool to see which Democratic proponent SJWs will purge next? TheBlackAdder Jun 2017 #2

Ahh the melodrama! Who are these mysterious SJWs you complain about? bettyellen Jun 2017 #5

Sasse immediately picked up on Maher's Malcolm X reference, the GOPs vision of indentured servitude. TheBlackAdder Jun 2017 #7

Again/ who are you calling SJWs and why are you using it in this melodramatic negative way? bettyellen Jun 2017 #9

Why are you assuming SJW applies to you? The "melodrama" is a soon to be born reality. TheBlackAdder Jun 2017 #10

I didn't say that- so strange since you're so good at typing so many words and yet.... bettyellen Jun 2017 #11

SJWs know who they are. I'm not getting dragged down that rabbit hole. TheBlackAdder Jun 2017 #14

Well if you're stooping to use RW perjoratives to describe loyal Dems perhaps.... you're lower than bettyellen Jun 2017 #15

whatever TheBlackAdder Jun 2017 #16

But that Sasse - he got the joke alright! Not like those foolish SJWs! /S bettyellen Jun 2017 #21

You're correct in the snarkiness. The "foolish SJWs," just the foolish ones. TheBlackAdder Jun 2017 #24

Jesus Christ, neither the article nor this thread says anything about Griffin or Maher muriel_volestrangler Jun 2017 #18

Suppressing liberal opinion directly applies to the following, in the article: TheBlackAdder Jun 2017 #19

You haven't a clue, have you? That's complaining that *conservative* opinion was oppressed muriel_volestrangler Jun 2017 #22

True. But the same machinery that performs one function can perform the other. TheBlackAdder Jun 2017 #23

I'm laughing. So hard. The horseshoe theory is REAL. HA HA HA bettyellen Jun 2017 #25

That is one of the most florid overwrought pieces of shit I ever read. WOW bettyellen Jun 2017 #6

LOL! That RW writer sounds very self-important! Madam45for2923 Jun 2017 #12

False equivalency is a handy dandy way of avoiding having to defend your position. ehrnst Jun 2017 #8

Yes, the republicans are extremely reflexive rock Jun 2017 #13

Where we fail is when we don't see that the debate is 100% partisan Cary Jun 2017 #26

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»The even more ridiculous ...»Reply #16