Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Alice11111

(5,730 posts)

1. If the London attackers had been able to get automatic

Reply to kpete (Original post)

Sun Jun 4, 2017, 02:17 PM

Jun 2017

Weapons, the lives of the dead and wounded would be multiples more.
When I saw Trump's tweet, I thought he is arguing against himself. His statement speaks to why we need gun control.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

10 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Gabby Giffords responds to Trump's tweet about a gun debate [View all] kpete Jun 2017 OP

If the London attackers had been able to get automatic Alice11111 Jun 2017 #1

Exactly, if guns were available to them, they'd have used them. OnDoutside Jun 2017 #3

Your election made majority of gun humpers happy. Gunners feel vindicated, especially the ignorant, Hoyt Jun 2017 #2

The majority of gun lovers are gilbert sullivan Jun 2017 #5

Definitely truth. If you are a gun lover/fancier, you might not like it, but it is truth. Hoyt Jun 2017 #6

Way to paint with a broad brush gilbert sullivan Jun 2017 #8

Maybe if that law had been written 20 years ago like Australia's, gunz would not be so available to Hoyt Jun 2017 #9

Please run for the US Senate against Jeff Flake or the US House against Martha McSally. nkpolitics1212 Jun 2017 #4

Great idea. Let them know they are needed. Alice11111 Jun 2017 #7

Trump muddles the issue The Wizard Jun 2017 #10