Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Shattered: It's not the book many here thought it was. [View all]QC
(26,371 posts)12. No thanks. Books sometimes contain heresy and false doctrine.
I'll stick to Twitter. Only there can one find the truth.
But seriously, you're right. It's a much better book than one would expect from the rabid denunciations of it here. The tone is pretty calm, sometimes even sympathetic for Sec. Clinton, a smart candidate who couldn't catch a lucky break at some critical times. The campaign's over-reliance on analytics is an important thing to take into 2018, as well as the need for a direct and compelling rational for running.
I don't think any one book can give us the whole truth, but this one can certainly provide part of the picture.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
50 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
No thanks, I'll wait for Hillary's book if I feel the need for any post mortem beyond what I already
seaglass
Jun 2017
#3
Why don't you share some of the hard words the authors had to say about Bernie? n/t
seaglass
Jun 2017
#7
Indeed. I certainly came away feeling like I had a much better insight into Hillary's personality.
Kentonio
Jun 2017
#14
That really wasn't the point of the book. It's not a broad cultural examination of "why she lost"
Warren DeMontague
Jun 2017
#39
data models are only as accurate as the data that gets collected and only as useful
geek tragedy
Jun 2017
#17
The answer is Hillary was a shoo-in and Bernie only ran because nobody else had the guts
BeyondGeography
Jun 2017
#27
Because she had the black vote locked up, and the hispanic vote was not far behind
BeyondGeography
Jun 2017
#30
Well, she did come close to Obama in 2008. She then added to her resume as SoS. She had high
seaglass
Jun 2017
#31
Not sure why you would think any Dem would have a chance in a change election so we put the best
seaglass
Jun 2017
#37
I don't know what the change was about Bernie. In any case we are dealing in the real world where
seaglass
Jun 2017
#43