Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Showing Original Post only (View all)

MineralMan

(151,786 posts)
Tue Jun 6, 2017, 09:29 AM Jun 2017

That NSA contractor knew that she would be discovered, I'm sure. [View all]

She didn't really try to cover her tracks at all. As someone who once worked inside the NSA while in the USAF, I know that she knew what the possible consequences were of leading a TS document that originated within the NSA. It would be impossible not to know those consequences, quite frankly.

And yet, she undertook to send the document to a so-called news website which doesn't have the very best reputation for being careful about protecting sources. Not only that, she had communicated with that website using her normal gmail account. She must have known that the NSA keeps track of all accesses to documents like that, along with records of who prints them.

So, for whatever reason, she went ahead with the leak, despite knowing that she could be found out very quickly. My only question is: Why she would do that? I suspect that she leaked it because she thought it was so important that it must be leaked. It was probably an act of civil disobedience, with full knowledge of what the consequences might be. If that is the case, she is a brave young woman.

However, I also believe that this information would have come out during the congressional investigations, at least to the members of the Intelligence Committees. It is that important. So, her brave action may not have been necessary. I hope she has a good defense attorney who can help her minimize the consequences.

39 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
She's a Patriot. There needs to be more Thrill Jun 2017 #1
Perhaps she is. Or perhaps she is a naive person. MineralMan Jun 2017 #2
I've noticed a number of EXPOSED leakers turn out to Hortensis Jun 2017 #35
I think the move she made wasn't necessary, and not very bright. jmg257 Jun 2017 #3
I'm quite sure she's very bright. MineralMan Jun 2017 #4
Facing up to 10 years for a mediocre report about Russia hacking...brilliant. jmg257 Jun 2017 #20
Well, it was her decision. MineralMan Jun 2017 #23
Or they could make an example of her because of ALL the recent leaking and put her away. jmg257 Jun 2017 #25
Yes. She's obviously a very bright person. MineralMan Jun 2017 #31
I disagree. cwydro Jun 2017 #37
I'm not so sure sfwriter Jun 2017 #5
Yes. That's more reason for me to think she exposed MineralMan Jun 2017 #6
Plenty of TS/SCI cleared folks have active social media.. HipChick Jun 2017 #28
Yes, of course they do. MineralMan Jun 2017 #29
"her brave action may not have been necessary. " NCTraveler Jun 2017 #7
Well, she made the decision, in any case. MineralMan Jun 2017 #9
My concern is with the information shared. NCTraveler Jun 2017 #12
The information is important. MineralMan Jun 2017 #13
It shouldn't surprise anyone. NCTraveler Jun 2017 #17
I imagine the NSA director will have MineralMan Jun 2017 #19
"I'm pretty sure" NCTraveler Jun 2017 #27
Just spit-balling here MM... Zoonart Jun 2017 #8
Could be. But I don't know. MineralMan Jun 2017 #10
She needs to setup a crowd funding for her defense beachbum bob Jun 2017 #11
I'm sure that will happen. MineralMan Jun 2017 #14
If it were me, I would've sent it to the NYT or Wash Post and not the Intercept NightWatcher Jun 2017 #15
Well, I wouldn't give Glenn Greenwald the sweat... MineralMan Jun 2017 #16
They might not have published it orangecrush Jun 2017 #18
I think they would have, although perhaps not MineralMan Jun 2017 #21
I trust your judgement on this orangecrush Jun 2017 #36
The Intercept got her caught justiceischeap Jun 2017 #22
The Intercept is a personal project, not a news organization, really. MineralMan Jun 2017 #24
How did they find the 2nd contractor? HipChick Jun 2017 #26
Here's where I got the info justiceischeap Jun 2017 #30
thanks HipChick Jun 2017 #32
I think the trump Justice Dept. is really going to try... dhill926 Jun 2017 #33
Probably. However, this type of case has many pitfalls for MineralMan Jun 2017 #34
I think she's a hero. Vinca Jun 2017 #38
Private contractor. moondust Jun 2017 #39
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»That NSA contractor knew ...