General Discussion

BumRushDaShow

(164,892 posts)

76. THIS

Reply to Pacifist Patriot (Reply #73)

Wed Jun 7, 2017, 10:19 AM

Jun 2017

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

124 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

LIVE - The Senate Intelligence Committee Undercard match is on now... [View all] brooklynite Jun 2017 OP

Watching. Burr was deferential.WARNER GoES THERE!! NT Persisted Jun 2017 #1

WARNER THROWS DOWN THE TRUMP/RUSSIA OBSTRUCTION! Persisted Jun 2017 #2

DEMS WILL ASK ROSENSTIEN ABOUT HIS ROLE COMEY FIRING. Persisted Jun 2017 #3

DEMS WILL ASK ABOUT COATES/ROGERS EXPLOITATION BY TRUMP. Persisted Jun 2017 #4

K & R..& thanks! furtheradu Jun 2017 #5

Warren drops the mic FM123 Jun 2017 #6

Steve Clemons (The Atlantic) says he heard Mike Rogers "might have a story to tell" brooklynite Jun 2017 #7

Unable to watch awesomerwb1 Jun 2017 #8

Deferential in opening. He wants this renewed. nt Persisted Jun 2017 #12

What does "renewed" mean? awesomerwb1 Jun 2017 #27

702 expires at the end of the year Persisted Jun 2017 #29

The Dems will be asking the important questions while Republicans procon Jun 2017 #9

Coats gives example of 702 collection..... Persisted Jun 2017 #10

Undercard? yallerdawg Jun 2017 #11

Let me put it this way...bars are opening tomorrow in DC for Comey viewing brooklynite Jun 2017 #13

Coats laying out framework for renewal... Persisted Jun 2017 #14

Coats giving terrific history on 702 Persisted Jun 2017 #15

But since there is no fourth amendment protection for foreign people in foreign lands Persisted Jun 2017 #16

Statute requires minimumization of Persisted Jun 2017 #17

Note majority of over steps on over collection are self repported Persisted Jun 2017 #18

This reminds me so much of Watergate spinbaby Jun 2017 #19

just said the same berksdem Jun 2017 #55

Detailed oversight by the fisa court..... Persisted Jun 2017 #20

We have never found an intentional violation of this program Persisted Jun 2017 #21

Most compliant incident which resulted in change..... Persisted Jun 2017 #22

How many Americans have been collected? Persisted Jun 2017 #23

Haji Iman case.....NSA tracking over 2 year period... Persisted Jun 2017 #24

burr up.....holder and clapper, 2012 reauth. Persisted Jun 2017 #25

Burr...any deliberate violations? No, from all panel. nt Persisted Jun 2017 #26

Burr.....so, we all good? What about 4th? Rodstien answers Persisted Jun 2017 #28

Rogers & Bar discussing reverse targeting..... Persisted Jun 2017 #30

Now Rodgers brings up incidental collection of US citizens Persisted Jun 2017 #31

Senator Warner bringing up Trump/Russia investigation now.Did Trump attempt to pressure Coates? brooklynite Jun 2017 #32

Warner goes there... Persisted Jun 2017 #33

Here we go, Warner on Trump obstruction efforts. L. Coyote Jun 2017 #34

Rogers sounds like a nasty bastard. BumRushDaShow Jun 2017 #35

No...he just threw Trump under the bus. nt Persisted Jun 2017 #38

I didn't think so BumRushDaShow Jun 2017 #41

Nope....you're missing the point. They say, like Persisted Jun 2017 #43

I understand that - i.e., confirming the fact that the conversation did take place BumRushDaShow Jun 2017 #48

The gravaman for obstruction is not the pressure Persisted Jun 2017 #54

What I posted in #57 BumRushDaShow Jun 2017 #62

Again.....that's a defense. A defense. nt Persisted Jun 2017 #67

And the assertion of obstruction is just hearsay until proven otherwise. BumRushDaShow Jun 2017 #72

Rogers basically just squashed the Trump meeting OliverQ Jun 2017 #36

That's not what he said.nt Persisted Jun 2017 #37

It is what he said and Coats just repeated it BumRushDaShow Jun 2017 #42

,Nope...... he said he didn't feel pressured, Persisted Jun 2017 #44

No, Rogers also said he didn't feel he was ever directed to do anything he felt was wrong OliverQ Jun 2017 #47

What he feels doesn't matter to an obstruction charge. Persisted Jun 2017 #58

But that would mean Rogers doesn't think Trump asking to intervene in an investigation is wrong. OliverQ Jun 2017 #60

The prevailing narrative BumRushDaShow Jun 2017 #57

Obstruction doesn't depend on everybody's feelings. Persisted Jun 2017 #59

I'm not talking "feelings" BumRushDaShow Jun 2017 #65

Coats now says he can't answer in public. nt Persisted Jun 2017 #39

So much for Rogers and Coats. Nothing going to happen with them. Imperialism Inc. Jun 2017 #40

This message was self-deleted by its author Pacifist Patriot Jun 2017 #45

No..... Persisted Jun 2017 #49

This message was self-deleted by its author Pacifist Patriot Jun 2017 #52

I'm feeling really cynical about Comey now OliverQ Jun 2017 #50

You mean the guy that helped put him in office to begin with. JTFrog Jun 2017 #84

Ask about the President AND any members of the Administration. Coats not answering the question. L. Coyote Jun 2017 #46

Because Coats chose to answer by asserting he never "felt pressure " did he not at least Ninga Jun 2017 #53

Yes. nt Persisted Jun 2017 #61

Pressure, as in "or I'll fire you." Does not preclude having been asked w/o pressure. L. Coyote Jun 2017 #66

Question. does a parsed answer open the door for a return to the original question? Nt Ninga Jun 2017 #68

Seems to me that Rubio knows what these bozos were going to say. Nt Ninga Jun 2017 #74

Rogers was asked an "if he ever" question and replied he won't answer hypothetical questions.... chelsea0011 Jun 2017 #51

Blurted that out loud in my office. Pacifist Patriot Jun 2017 #56

Neither Coates or Rogers will discuss specifics of private conversations with trump still_one Jun 2017 #63

Well....Feinstien just smacked DOJ.....Rogers answering Persisted Jun 2017 #64

Rubio had dinner with Trump to prepare for these hearings. L. Coyote Jun 2017 #69

Agree. Ninga Jun 2017 #77

What about "questions with a Senator, or questions with a lawyer, or questions wi a Congressman or Ninga Jun 2017 #90

So much corruption, so much treason OliverQ Jun 2017 #85

Rubio goes for the Leaks angle first; Rogers reiterates he won't discuss Trump in PUBLIC... brooklynite Jun 2017 #70

Rubio just fucked Trump. nt Persisted Jun 2017 #71

This message was self-deleted by its author Pacifist Patriot Jun 2017 #73

Agree. Rubio knew what these guys were going to say. Nt Ninga Jun 2017 #75

THIS BumRushDaShow Jun 2017 #76

He is carrying water for Trump and going after Obama. L. Coyote Jun 2017 #79

I'm not saying he did it deliberately. nt Persisted Jun 2017 #80

Here comes Wyden BumRushDaShow Jun 2017 #78

Holy Shit. nt Persisted Jun 2017 #81

That's going to leave some marks... brooklynite Jun 2017 #86

Ooh! 3 out of 4 won't comment on taking notes! blogslut Jun 2017 #82

I loved the "don't understand the question" delaying tactic. Pacifist Patriot Jun 2017 #88

Yep. There are notes. L. Coyote Jun 2017 #89

Wyden finally asking great questions. And getting non-answers. L. Coyote Jun 2017 #83

Wyden is the best so far. Real questions. Coates is not cooperating. L. Coyote Jun 2017 #87

Rogers and Coates danced around DeminPennswoods Jun 2017 #91

Rogers and Coates confirmed Mueller is investingation Trump for obstruction involving them L. Coyote Jun 2017 #96

Susan Collins slipped the knife. nt Persisted Jun 2017 #92

Understand..... she asked why Obama was able to get Persisted Jun 2017 #97

Heinrich just kicked some serious ass. nt Persisted Jun 2017 #93

He's not backing down! Hell, I'm starting to feel uncomfortable under his grilling. LOL! Pacifist Patriot Jun 2017 #94

I like this Heinrich fellow. blogslut Jun 2017 #95

Blunt.....a rose is a rose. nt Persisted Jun 2017 #98

Angus kicking ass and taking no prisoners! BumRushDaShow Jun 2017 #99

Oh, holy shit Angus King!!! Persisted Jun 2017 #100

Angus King is not having it. blogslut Jun 2017 #101

General Counsel at the White House is controlling the panel. L. Coyote Jun 2017 #102

This is bizarre. Executive privilege would never hold up in court. They know that. bettyellen Jun 2017 #112

This seems an end run around the fact it would not hold up. L. Coyote Jun 2017 #117

Asked? Heron5 Jun 2017 #103

Precisely. nt Persisted Jun 2017 #104

It is obvious the Mueller investigation is overlapping some of the inquiries. In other words L. Coyote Jun 2017 #106

YES. nt furtheradu Jun 2017 #107

The President is under criminal investigation and that has to be the bottom line here. L. Coyote Jun 2017 #105

Continuation thread now up..... brooklynite Jun 2017 #108

And Burr just confirmed that Russia is briefed Persisted Jun 2017 #109

Not in today's closed session. Heron5 Jun 2017 #110

Rogers and his "I would hope so" is incredibly weasely. bettyellen Jun 2017 #115

Kamala! She's good. bettyellen Jun 2017 #111

Trying to pin down Rosenstein to tell Mueller he will not be fired. bettyellen Jun 2017 #113

"Folks" Pat Fitgerald Persisted Jun 2017 #114

"So is that a 'No'?" nt Persisted Jun 2017 #116

Coates disparaging WaPo in response to McCains questions about their reports. bettyellen Jun 2017 #118

No..Kabuki. mt Persisted Jun 2017 #119

McCain is doing a good job validating The Post's article. writes3000 Jun 2017 #120

Aw shucks McCain...just trying to be all warm and fuzzy...not a forceful question in his body. Nt Ninga Jun 2017 #121

Knife slipping in. nt Persisted Jun 2017 #122

Agree. writes3000 Jun 2017 #123

These 4 are now officially part of the cover up DeminPennswoods Jun 2017 #124