Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Vote Against FDR in '44 [View all]JackRiddler
(24,979 posts)46. Logic isn't going to get you anywhere with someone who'd use this "argument."
The US also engaged in massive carpet bombings of cities (albeit of an actual, not imagined enemy country), so we should be grateful that the present administration murders innocent civilians (on the other side of the planet in places that don't actually matter to "our" "interests"
in a more retail fashion.
You have hit on a proper analogy, by the way. It exposes just how sick it is to draw the parallel, and how corrupt people are willing to be on behalf of their chosen "side." If Muslims were rounded up clearly there are indeed those who would still argue in Obama's defense on the basis that the Republicans are very, very bad.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
64 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
There may have been instances where US Citizens were killed by US forces as enemycombatants in WWII,
leveymg
Dec 2011
#6
I'm making a larger point about how the GWOT is dissimiliar to the methods used by the US in WWII
leveymg
Dec 2011
#9
Yes, Obama's authorized extrajudicial executions. A number of them. That's a major dissimilarity.
leveymg
Dec 2011
#14
If Republicans can animate a block of marble like Mitt Romney, we can zombify FDR.
Bucky
Dec 2011
#34
You're right. FDR had vast majorities in Congress. Obama has had to fight much harder for everything
MjolnirTime
Dec 2011
#32
The was never an actual functioning majority in the Senate, and that made all the difference.
MjolnirTime
Dec 2011
#41
He did dump that left wing Henry Wallace in '44 for that moderate Harry Truman!!
WI_DEM
Dec 2011
#31
Logic isn't going to get you anywhere with someone who'd use this "argument."
JackRiddler
Dec 2011
#46
Still, it's silly to compare Obama after one term to all that FDR had done after three.
Ken Burch
Jan 2012
#63