General Discussion

LisaM

(29,648 posts)

40. Of course, he wasn't really a successful CEO, though that's beside the point.

Thu Jun 8, 2017, 01:15 PM

Jun 2017

How can anyone defend him on the basis of being unqualified for the job, or unaware of what it entails? And how can anyone who knows someone is unqualified vote for that person?

This isn't running for president of a high school class. This is one of the most important jobs in the world, and knowingly voting for an unqualified person is just wicked.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

43 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Jill Wine-Banks just nailed one of Trump's escape hatches shut on Chris Hayes [View all] Miles Archer Jun 2017 OP

K&R n/t rzemanfl Jun 2017 #1

Nice! leftstreet Jun 2017 #2

Yep and to the greatest page malaise Jun 2017 #3

K & R GP6971 Jun 2017 #4

K&R! gademocrat7 Jun 2017 #5

But that's deductive reasoning ProudLib72 Jun 2017 #6

And any type of reasoning is the work of the devil! erronis Jun 2017 #17

God has been making the rounds more frequently ProudLib72 Jun 2017 #29

LOL :-) iluvtennis Jun 2017 #28

Putting out an opening statement will allow Comey to prepare for the attack: so far AnotherMother4Peace Jun 2017 #7

Another reason to put out an opening statement is to prevent a last minute Trump shut down AnotherMother4Peace Jun 2017 #25

And, apparently, Comey explained to the president that the FBI director position Baitball Blogger Jun 2017 #8

so Trump can't complain and say he didn't know. HE WAS NOT IGNORANT. He knew. trueblue2007 Jun 2017 #10

Yes lpbk2713 Jun 2017 #9

That was a good observation she made about Trump criticizing Bill Clinton meeting Loretta Lynch wishstar Jun 2017 #11

Excellent. K&R. n/t BlancheSplanchnik Jun 2017 #12

I don't think Jill Wine-Banks was ever an FBI Agent, but marybourg Jun 2017 #13

I edited the thread title Miles Archer Jun 2017 #15

Thank you for grabbing the story. marybourg Jun 2017 #16

Beauty! H2O Man Jun 2017 #14

I'm sorry - I must have missed the source to this thread. erronis Jun 2017 #18

Chris Hayes, MSNBC, no link, I transcribed it, it's in my thread title Miles Archer Jun 2017 #22

Ironic that the day *45 1st attempted to obstruct justice was same day WH counsel formally MedusaX Jun 2017 #19

great point roscoeroscoe Jun 2017 #35

Intent. Barack_America Jun 2017 #20

The word "innocent" has been tossed around all night Miles Archer Jun 2017 #24

Of course, he wasn't really a successful CEO, though that's beside the point. LisaM Jun 2017 #40

Trump and his surrogates can't pretend he didn't know. nt oasis Jun 2017 #21

it doesn't even matter if he knew it was wrong. it is still a crime Takket Jun 2017 #23

The GOPers and drumpers are really going all out with their think tank talking points. BSdetect Jun 2017 #26

HUM how does that saying go? bluestarone Jun 2017 #27

K&R for... meow2u3 Jun 2017 #30

Lock him up? Cracklin Charlie Jun 2017 #31

Yup. That was brilliant. SunSeeker Jun 2017 #32

Saw it and loved it. The way she explained that there was no evidence R B Garr Jun 2017 #33

Saw Wine too & loved her perfunctory dismissal of Trump's 'ignorance"defense stuffmatters Jun 2017 #34

One more brick in the wall that will shut Trump in for life. Nitram Jun 2017 #36

The way he handled proves he knows he was doing wrong. lark Jun 2017 #37

k and r niyad Jun 2017 #38

Oh...logic. Wednesdays Jun 2017 #39

Completely frustrating to be more equipped to govern than nearly the entire GOP. SleeplessinSoCal Jun 2017 #41

No, no, no. He's knows it's wrong if the Clintons do it. If he does stuff, well, that's different. tclambert Jun 2017 #42

Watergate Prosecutor Jill Wine-Banks L. Coyote Jun 2017 #43