Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Hekate

(100,133 posts)
20. I watched a ton of WW II movies when I was a kid-- on B/W tv late at night while babysitting
Thu Jun 8, 2017, 02:35 PM
Jun 2017

Last edited Thu Jun 8, 2017, 03:32 PM - Edit history (1)

I recommend any and all of that genre from THAT time for the young. There's a clear sense of right and wrong, of courage and brotherhood, all of the things you want to expose your kid to, without the overwhelming emphasis on blood and gore. People die and are maimed, but somehow it's not the same as now. The story of Anne Frank is out there. In the modern era, there's Schindler's list.

It's a horrifying era that deserves to be remembered and told to the young, but given to them in bites they can chew. You have to talk about what you're viewing. How did Hitler rise? How did civilized Europe rend itself to pieces? Could it happen again? (Yes, repeatedly, just not in Europe) Could it happen here? (What do you think?) And so on.

Has your son read Harry Potter and the Order of the Phoenix? As a kid I read a slew of post-WW II books about kids in The Resistance. I imagined myself being that brave.

Dunkirk? You be the judge. There's always next year and the year after.

Grandma Hekate

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

if the movie only depicts 1/100th of what actually happened at Dunkirk Javaman Jun 2017 #1
I think it depends on the child. redwitch Jun 2017 #2
I agree, my son has just turned 11 and I'm not sure he would be ready yet. Looks great though. OnDoutside Jun 2017 #15
Probably not. The rating on this movie is PG-13 due to the war scenes, including bodies washing up Arkansas Granny Jun 2017 #3
PG-13 means parents should EVALUATE the film for their children under 13. It is a mild rating for a anneboleyn Jun 2017 #44
Which is why I suggested that the OP see the film first and then decide. Arkansas Granny Jun 2017 #46
It's PG-13 geomon666 Jun 2017 #4
I agree with redwitch: it depends on the child. CaliforniaPeggy Jun 2017 #5
I watch a lot of war movies eleny Jun 2017 #6
NO! It's supposed to be great, but as violent or more than Saving Private Ryan! Chasstev365 Jun 2017 #7
No....10 is probably too young for most kids... Sancho Jun 2017 #8
What Javaman & Redwitch said irisblue Jun 2017 #9
this one looks really, really emotionally intense geek tragedy Jun 2017 #10
If this is the first time you're telling your son that there's "bad" in this world, I can think of WhiskeyGrinder Jun 2017 #11
I thought Saving Private Ryan was too graphic. Ilsa Jun 2017 #12
I like this suggestion. See it yourself first. Then ask yourself if this specific 10-yr-old is ready Iggo Jun 2017 #28
Private Ryan had an R rating. Of course it was graphic. This film is PG-13 (as new Star Wars films) anneboleyn Jun 2017 #45
It depends on the 10 year old and the movie Lurks Often Jun 2017 #13
I'd first view the "Band of Brothers" series with him while at home. oasis Jun 2017 #14
Great suggestion... rppper Jun 2017 #17
My parents lived those years in England. cwydro Jun 2017 #16
My grandfather took me to see Das Boot Sen. Walter Sobchak Jun 2017 #18
Of course not, I don't know any 10 year olds. cbdo2007 Jun 2017 #19
I watched a ton of WW II movies when I was a kid-- on B/W tv late at night while babysitting Hekate Jun 2017 #20
Which is it: "to see...'Dunkirk'"; or "a WWII movie"? Specific or general? WinkyDink Jun 2017 #21
I would taught_me_patience Jun 2017 #22
Absolutely obamanut2012 Jun 2017 #23
If he's going with you he'll be fine lunatica Jun 2017 #24
Yes B2G Jun 2017 #25
At some point jeffreyi Jun 2017 #26
Not a fucking chance. (n/t) Iggo Jun 2017 #27
I remember sitting on my dad's lap when I was around 4yo watching Victory at Sea on the TV... Rollo Jun 2017 #29
I think we shield kids too much about real demosincebirth Jun 2017 #30
This message was self-deleted by its author Warren DeMontague Jun 2017 #39
Your view point. demosincebirth Jun 2017 #42
This message was self-deleted by its author Warren DeMontague Jun 2017 #43
Breastfeeding? Good one! demosincebirth Jun 2017 #53
This message was self-deleted by its author Warren DeMontague Jun 2017 #54
I was a little kid in the 50's/60's sammythecat Jun 2017 #31
Depends on the kid. politicat Jun 2017 #32
At 16, in two years he could be drafted. This is why I think seeing PG-13 war films teaches very anneboleyn Jun 2017 #48
I know. And now, we could do so. politicat Jun 2017 #50
Many years ago when I was 10... Tracer Jun 2017 #33
This message was self-deleted by its author Warren DeMontague Jun 2017 #34
I remember seeing The Shining when I was like 8 years old Quixote1818 Jun 2017 #35
This message was self-deleted by its author Warren DeMontague Jun 2017 #36
dunno about the kid but i wanna see it...i saw the longest day when i was 9 dembotoz Jun 2017 #37
This message was self-deleted by its author Warren DeMontague Jun 2017 #38
No. Not even if I thought they could handle it berni_mccoy Jun 2017 #40
My son is 10, and I will take him to see Dunkirk Bad Thoughts Jun 2017 #41
I think a movie about violence in context vs Darth Vader slaughtering 50 rebel troops anneboleyn Jun 2017 #47
I saw Patton at that age when it came out. bluedigger Jun 2017 #49
Be sure to explain to him what Dunkirk was about. oneshooter Jun 2017 #51
I grew up in Dunkirk UT_democrat Jun 2017 #52
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Would you take a 10-year ...»Reply #20