Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Showing Original Post only (View all)Krugman: 'We can only assume' Romney is 'hiding something seriously damaging' [View all]
http://www.nytimes.com/2012/07/09/opinion/krugman-mitts-gray-areas.htmlOnce upon a time a rich man named Romney ran for president. He could claim, with considerable justice, that his wealth was well-earned, that he had in fact done a lot to create good jobs for American workers. Nonetheless, the public understandably wanted to know both how he had grown so rich and what he had done with his wealth; he obliged by releasing extensive information about his financial history.
But that was 44 years ago. And the contrast between George Romney and his son Mitt a contrast both in their business careers and in their willingness to come clean about their financial affairs dramatically illustrates how America has changed.
... One more thing: To the extent that Mr. Romney has a coherent policy agenda, it involves cutting tax rates on the very rich which are already, as I said, down by about half since his fathers time. Surely a man advocating such policies has a special obligation to level with voters about the extent to which he would personally benefit from the policies he advocates.
Yet obviously thats something Mr. Romney doesnt want to do. And unless he does reveal the truth about his investments, we can only assume that hes hiding something seriously damaging.
44 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Krugman: 'We can only assume' Romney is 'hiding something seriously damaging' [View all]
Newsjock
Jul 2012
OP
But....he's living the American Dream....He should be aplauded for success!
LiberalLovinLug
Jul 2012
#34
Funny you should use that figure; I discovered a small cadre in my neighborhood this evening who ARE
patrice
Jul 2012
#6
I suspect he paid little or nothing in federal tax and I think he probably did it legally.
pa28
Jul 2012
#7
If Obama HAD to show his birth cerfiticate, certainly Rmoney can show his tax returns...
Curtland1015
Jul 2012
#11
That could be it. Voting in MA but claiming NH as primary residence for tax purposes.
yellowcanine
Jul 2012
#24
"Ball so hard muhfuckers wanna fine me...but first they gotta find me
alcibiades_mystery
Jul 2012
#38
Agreed. I'm a tiny corporation and even my tax attorney/preparer makes long term plans with us
riderinthestorm
Jul 2012
#41