Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Ptah

(34,126 posts)
11. Column The NRA has blocked gun violence research for 20 years. Let's end its stranglehold on science
Thu Jun 15, 2017, 07:58 PM
Jun 2017

<snip>

It’s widely supposed that Congress enacted a “ban” on federal
funding for gun violence research in 1996. That isn’t quite true,
says Mark Rosenberg, a gun violence expert who was head of the
federal Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s National
Center for Injury Prevention and Control at the time.
But the truth is even more demoralizing.


Infuriated by CDC-funded research suggesting that having firearms in
the home sharply increased the risks of homicide, the NRA goaded
Congress in 1996 into stripping the injury center’s funding for gun
violence research – $2.6 million. Congress then passed a measure
drafted by then-Rep. Jay Dickey (R-Ga.) forbidding the CDC to spend
funds “to advocate or promote gun control.” (The NRA initially hoped
to eradicate the injury center entirely.)

The Dickey Amendment didn’t technically ban any federally funded gun
violence research. The real blow was delivered by a succession of
pusillanimous CDC directors, who decided that the safest course
bureaucratically was simply to zero out the whole field.


<snip>

The consequence is that we’re flying blind on gun violence. Rosenberg
and other experts list four topics on which research is crucial.
First is the scale of the problem — how many people are shot,
is the number rising or falling, who gets shot, under what circumstances,
and with what weapons?
Second, what are the causes? “What leads people to shoot other
people or kill themselves?” Rosenberg asked.
(Two-thirds of gun deaths are suicides, he says.)

Third is learning what works to prevent gun violence, and fourth
is figuring out how to translate these findings into policy.
Legislators across the country have enacted laws allowing
open-carry of firearms on the street or in public places, or
authorizing teachers to carry arms in the classroom or on campus,
“with no idea whether that would result in more people being killed or
more lives being saved,” Rosenberg says.

http://www.latimes.com/business/hiltzik/la-fi-hiltzik-gun-research-funding-20160614-snap-story.html

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

okay, I'll bite Alex - "Guns for $50" n/m bagelsforbreakfast Jun 2017 #1
As far as I know they have all been white males nt Phoenix61 Jun 2017 #2
Of varying shades, shall we say? WinkyDink Jun 2017 #3
Well most of 'em anyway.., jmg257 Jun 2017 #5
No Lee-Lee Jun 2017 #6
I stand corrected Phoenix61 Jun 2017 #7
The male part of it is probably right rurallib Jun 2017 #9
D.C. snipers? Colin Ferguson? Sylvia Seegrist? Laurie Dann? James Edward Pough? trentwestcott Jun 2017 #12
Yeah google it, there are hundreds on how changing the Exultant Democracy Jun 2017 #4
Most actually did show signs of violent behavior or mental illness Lee-Lee Jun 2017 #8
Barred from legally buying or owning firearms? Wasn't he already legally barred from killing people? trentwestcott Jun 2017 #13
You can put obstacles in the way of people like him Lee-Lee Jun 2017 #18
I'm sorry, did you just agree with me? trentwestcott Jun 2017 #20
Domestic violence, for one. LisaM Jun 2017 #10
Yes I heard this on a podcast today Egnever Jun 2017 #22
Column The NRA has blocked gun violence research for 20 years. Let's end its stranglehold on science Ptah Jun 2017 #11
Yeah. That's the real problem. They don't allow research to find how to prevent gun violence. Kablooie Jun 2017 #15
Author suggests domestic abuse. moondust Jun 2017 #14
male losers who DO have a history of violent asshole behavior JI7 Jun 2017 #16
This is very true, especially in the big ones Alea Jun 2017 #24
if you look at the Terrorists in Europe , they have similar violent loser backgrounds JI7 Jun 2017 #17
You don't think it makes sense to close the gun show loophole? Or regulate Internet sales? Vinca Jun 2017 #19
I'm fine with much of that Lee-Lee Jun 2017 #21
I Can Think Of Two Off The Top Of My Head ChoppinBroccoli Jun 2017 #23
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Have there been any studi...»Reply #11