Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

worse than that, he shot a bunch of people SethH Jun 2017 #1
I'm talking about his motive louis c Jun 2017 #2
And what new law would have stopped this attack? DaleFromWPB Jun 2017 #9
Background checks...the guy beat his wife. Demsrule86 Jun 2017 #13
As far as I know, he was never convicted. Per the Lautenberg amendment.. X_Digger Jun 2017 #19
That is not necessarily true. Even if they go to court, in many states domestic abuse is a Demsrule86 Jun 2017 #56
No- even misdemeanor domestic abuse is covered Lee-Lee Jun 2017 #64
Until you end gun show loopholes and internet sales...it really does't matter... Demsrule86 Jun 2017 #100
Both of those "loopholes" were closed in Illinois where he got his guns Lee-Lee Jun 2017 #106
Anybody can charge anybody else with domestic abuse customerserviceguy Jun 2017 #84
No, even charged.. under indictment for, convicted of, or subject to a restraining order for... X_Digger Jun 2017 #85
I don't need a next...my point was there are dangerous folks with guns...and until you rip Demsrule86 Jun 2017 #99
You can't until the case is adjudicated Lee-Lee Jun 2017 #107
That's already the case. Under indictment for.. subject to a restraining order for.. convicted of.. X_Digger Jun 2017 #116
Now that's what I call karma MiddleClass Jun 2017 #26
even worse his 17 yr old foster kid doused herself with gas & killed herself. another foster girl.. Sunlei Jun 2017 #44
That law already exists but he was never convicted Lee-Lee Jun 2017 #49
This one: lapucelle Jun 2017 #27
Here is the list of Prohibited Persons. Domestic abusers are already prohibited. discntnt_irny_srcsm Jun 2017 #34
Not all states follow the iterim provisions lapucelle Jun 2017 #42
That wasn't the issue here Lee-Lee Jun 2017 #50
That's probably one of the reasons why lapucelle Jun 2017 #52
Isn't this why slapping a on a federal band-aid... discntnt_irny_srcsm Jun 2017 #63
It took a long time lapucelle Jun 2017 #68
re: "...state-by-state solutions frequently game the system with legalistic loopholes." discntnt_irny_srcsm Jun 2017 #71
That's what makes the Supreme Court lapucelle Jun 2017 #74
It's such a no-brainer, makes you wonder what makes gun humping repugs tick? brush Jun 2017 #72
Don't believe everything you see in the movies... Baconator Jun 2017 #110
That's supposed to reassure us? It's definitely quieter. Why would anyone advocate for that? brush Jun 2017 #117
It's quieter but nowhere near quiet... Baconator Jun 2017 #118
Why would anyone advocate for that? Lee-Lee Jun 2017 #119
Are you sure you belong here? louis c Jun 2017 #45
I would think so. Demsrule86 Jun 2017 #57
Defending civil liberties is always welcome at DU. aikoaiko Jun 2017 #126
"It is my contention..." panader0 Jun 2017 #17
but people who voted 3rd party, blanks and write ins were, and he was one louis c Jun 2017 #39
No. OrwellwasRight Jun 2017 #54
But if Hillary recieved more votes in 3 states she would have won louis c Jun 2017 #58
And the people who voted for Trump are the people who voted for Trump. OrwellwasRight Jun 2017 #61
Um, Hitler was appointed, not elected (similar to Bush 2000) - nt KingCharlemagne Jun 2017 #80
Sorry to clutter your mind with the facts......... louis c Jun 2017 #94
Well, since we're talking 'facts,' the Nazi Party received a plurality, not a majority, in KingCharlemagne Jun 2017 #95
Just like Trump louis c Jun 2017 #101
Dumbest opinion piece ever... HopeAgain Jun 2017 #3
Beat me too it! Chasstev365 Jun 2017 #5
When an election is a clear choice, make the right choice. Blue_true Jun 2017 #6
It's that's simple. And not difficult to grasp ++++++++++ JHan Jun 2017 #89
Seriously...he shot folks who are GOP...while he put them in office. Demsrule86 Jun 2017 #14
yep. iamthebandfanman Jun 2017 #23
Post removed Post removed Jun 2017 #24
Welcome to DU. Enjoy your stay. GoneOffShore Jun 2017 #46
To listen to this BS Mariana Jun 2017 #86
but the people who hate Trump louis c Jun 2017 #104
It's a fact they made up the marginal difference Mariana Jun 2017 #108
Yep. SMC22307 Jun 2017 #111
Word. nt Blue_true Jun 2017 #4
Divisive progressive-bashing. /nt philly_bob Jun 2017 #7
I don't consider that guy a progressive...those who voted for Hillary in the election are Demsrule86 Jun 2017 #15
He wasn't a progressive, Progressive dog Jun 2017 #22
'Green Spoiler' - Soylent green that's gone bad. GoneOffShore Jun 2017 #48
that gun nut piece of shit was not a progressive. JI7 Jun 2017 #35
People who don't vote or vote Green... Expecting Rain Jun 2017 #8
Folks, this guy was from Illionis where Hillary had no trouble winning. His vote was worthless to Jim Beard Jun 2017 #10
thanks, I was about to point that out and will comment Blue Ridge Virginia Jun 2017 #11
I live in Texas so my vote is always pissed off, all up and down the ballot. Jim Beard Jun 2017 #65
He may have cost us Georgia 6 and when he spreads hatred on his face book Demsrule86 Jun 2017 #16
He was likely a libertarian that grabbed on to Sanders proposals. Blue_true Jun 2017 #69
He was not a libertarian...he was a a Dem...I read his past post going back to Obama...and then Demsrule86 Jun 2017 #103
Ossoff and his people must point out that Bernie did not endorse Ossoff. Blue_true Jun 2017 #112
Yeah, where people live does actually make a difference. TDale313 Jun 2017 #29
it's not just his own vote. it was his bashing and getting others to do the same JI7 Jun 2017 #38
but the folks in Wisconsin, Penn. amd Mich did, and they thought like him louis c Jun 2017 #40
Thanks. elleng Jun 2017 #77
Yup. +1 nt riderinthestorm Jun 2017 #102
One of the idiots who were shaped by Russian Republicans MiddleClass Jun 2017 #12
A vote for anyone other than Hillary is a vote for Trump IronLionZion Jun 2017 #18
We also have an electoral college TDale313 Jun 2017 #30
Popular vote helps provide the mandate IronLionZion Jun 2017 #51
Their side could care less. TDale313 Jun 2017 #70
I could care less what their side thinks IronLionZion Jun 2017 #82
It's irrelevant. He was never going to vote for Hillary. progressoid Jun 2017 #20
I don't know where this idea comes from Mariana Jun 2017 #115
Hillary won his state Not Ruth Jun 2017 #21
If you read the OP louis c Jun 2017 #41
K&R stonecutter357 Jun 2017 #25
it's not just the vote but the hate and lies he spread against the dem while voting for Putin troll JI7 Jun 2017 #28
Unfortunately there are mentally ill on both sides of the spectrum that turn to violence nini Jun 2017 #31
This article reads like bad DU thread melman Jun 2017 #32
+1 flibbitygiblets Jun 2017 #47
Right. SMDH nt riderinthestorm Jun 2017 #105
Post removed Post removed Jun 2017 #33
I'm glad Hillary didn't appeal to fucked up types like him JI7 Jun 2017 #36
Considering his history of violence, he shouldn't have been allowed to keep his weapons That Guy 888 Jun 2017 #60
yes dukakis was ahead until the rape question in the debate JI7 Jun 2017 #62
The Snoopy Tank Helmet (so he could hear the tank crew on the radio) didn't help either. That Guy 888 Jun 2017 #75
no, mccain and romney did not do dog whistles either. JI7 Jun 2017 #87
No, I'm not refighting the primary, I'm refighting the General Election louis c Jun 2017 #53
Sure, whatever you have to tell yourself to keep going. That Guy 888 Jun 2017 #66
You'll take heat, but you make excellent points leftstreet Jun 2017 #67
Thanks, I think heat is going to be the norm until we can stop annoying each other That Guy 888 Jun 2017 #78
Did Kissinger actually ever endorse her? lapucelle Jun 2017 #79
Yes and no. I don't have glowing praise for Kissinger, do you? That Guy 888 Jun 2017 #81
So Kissinger never actually endorsed her, lapucelle Jun 2017 #83
+++++++++++++++ JHan Jun 2017 #90
Just to let you know louis c Jun 2017 #121
You're bragging that you voted against the Democratic nominee for president. yardwork Jun 2017 #98
yeah stein got a couple percent & that 3rd party man got a couple percent extra especially in Pa. Sunlei Jun 2017 #37
I hate Trump but I'd rather end him by voting him out of office. Initech Jun 2017 #43
Valid points Thinkingabout Jun 2017 #55
Not helpful to keep bashing fellow Democrats. OrwellwasRight Jun 2017 #59
Anyone who could not see the danger of Trump and vote accordingly isn't a fellow Democrat. Blue_true Jun 2017 #73
Circular firing squads fail. OrwellwasRight Jun 2017 #97
the piece of shit shooter was not a democrat. he believed in dnc conspiracy theories and voted for JI7 Jun 2017 #92
I'm not talking about the shooter, so quit making stuff up. OrwellwasRight Jun 2017 #96
Anyone who didn't vote for Clinton elected Trump. End of story. nt Blue_true Jun 2017 #114
You certainly get my point. louis c Jun 2017 #120
The people who voted for Trump voted for Trump. End of Story. OrwellwasRight Jun 2017 #123
I don't hate anyone. but a fact is a fact louis c Jun 2017 #124
The issue that I have with third party voters. Blue_true Jun 2017 #128
I don't hate progressives that voted third party. But I don't respect them either. Blue_true Jun 2017 #127
Before the Gunfire in Virginia, a Volatile Home Life in Illinois elleng Jun 2017 #76
Short view vs a long view... Baconator Jun 2017 #88
To be honest... LeftishBrit Jun 2017 #91
No shitting louis c Jun 2017 #93
Did Jill Stein receive a statistically significant vote? Oneironaut Jun 2017 #109
Both are the case, but Stein votes still cost us the election, louis c Jun 2017 #113
I agree. Stein voters are all either insane or folks that were so scorned by losing the primary stevenleser Jun 2017 #122
This article will like a hornets nest Renew Deal Jun 2017 #125
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»James Hodgkinson, the DC ...»Reply #22