Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

hfojvt

(37,573 posts)
20. for a couple of reasons - anecdotally
Mon Jul 9, 2012, 05:45 PM
Jul 2012

One day at work these guys were playing basketball in the gym. Presumably not robbers, just there innocently playing basketball. Another couple was there with a toddler. Toddler, toddled on out of the gym, as toddlers do, and parents went after her.

Next thing you know, all the basketball players are gone, run out the back door of the gym.

Along with the mother's purse.

Another day I came around the corner and saw this guy walking away from my front porch. Well, what the hell was he doing? Just walking by and decided to check the door to see if it was unlocked and he could steal somiething.

So some people, even when they are walking home from the store, or playing basketball, will have their eyes open for an opportunity.

In fact, that was how I got robbed this weekend. Like an idiot, I forgot to shut my car trunk (either that or I slammed it shut and it did not latch). Some person, or people, just happened by, probably doing something else and said to themselves "Hey look some idiot left his trunk open, let's look through it and see if there's anything I/we want, and hey here's a can of tennis balls that I have no use for, but since they are here, why don't I just toss them across the street just for the hell of it?"

I recovered two tennis balls and the lid to the can. And another bag with some bumperstickers (of all things) and a computer keyboard was left on the corner, apparently too heavy to carry, or something.

Again, sometimes people are not "just walking" but have their eyes open to opportunity. I don't know that Trayvon would be that way, but I don't know that he wouldn't. Both he and Zimmerman are strangers to me.

I relate to Zimmerman because he was trying to help. Trying to keep his neighbors from getting robbed, trying to make sure the punks don't get away with it. He could have just gone to Target and not be on trial today, but perhaps Trayvon could have just answered a few questions or even told him to fuck off (but not thrown any punches) and still be alive today.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

I haven't commented on this very sad episode but this is 100% correct: Zimmerman was stalking byeya Jul 2012 #1
Yes, stalking is following in a theatening manner. HooptieWagon Jul 2012 #2
Zman then chased him with a gun uponit7771 Jul 2012 #3
If I thought a man was chasing me with a gun LynneSin Jul 2012 #5
Are you of the school that Zimmerman was brandishing the weapon while walking? slackmaster Jul 2012 #10
Doesn't matter whether Martin saw a weapon or not. GoneOffShore Jul 2012 #32
This case is all about common sense. Everything that happened after Zimmerman pacalo Jul 2012 #4
I still have not had my question answered: Zimmerman said louis-t Jul 2012 #6
Here is a good summary, WP blog... uppityperson Jul 2012 #7
It sounds like this is the direction the lead prosecutor is taking. Baitball Blogger Jul 2012 #8
The defense will admit that Zimmerman was following Travon, but lost sight of him and broke off... slackmaster Jul 2012 #9
Are you of the school that Trayvon came out of the shadows and attacked Zimmerman? uppityperson Jul 2012 #28
No. I believe the defense will claim an interval of disengagement... slackmaster Jul 2012 #33
Which do you believe? uppityperson Jul 2012 #34
I believe Zimmerman is morally responsible for a needless death because he started the confrontation slackmaster Jul 2012 #38
thank you uppityperson Jul 2012 #39
Trayvon's actions would be a clear abuse of SYG hfojvt Jul 2012 #11
The follower was the guy with the fucking GUN! DevonRex Jul 2012 #13
How did he know that Zimmerman had a gun? slackmaster Jul 2012 #15
usually you defend yourself from a gun hfojvt Jul 2012 #18
Trayvon didn't beat the crap out of Zimmerman Daalalou Jul 2012 #37
AND why do you correlate Trayvon to the robbers? DevonRex Jul 2012 #16
for a couple of reasons - anecdotally hfojvt Jul 2012 #20
That is totally fucked-up reasoning, man. It makes NO sense. Nt DevonRex Jul 2012 #22
"perhaps Trayvon could have just answered a few questions"... ljm2002 Jul 2012 #27
"Martin" is Trayvon. Do you mean Zimmerman? uppityperson Jul 2012 #29
Oops! I will correct it, thx. n/t ljm2002 Jul 2012 #35
Trying to help? NO! Self appointed wannabe. Neighbourhood Watch... TheMadMonk Jul 2012 #40
Wow that's a rather bizarre mental process on display... ljm2002 Jul 2012 #23
The reasoning got worse, too. I'm speechless. Nt DevonRex Jul 2012 #25
Trayvon Martin. George Zimmerman. uppityperson Jul 2012 #30
Your TRUNK was robbed of tennis balls and you want the person SHOT??? DevonRex Jul 2012 #26
I'd rather not live in a society where someone is shot for taking a couple tennis balls. Good grief. uppityperson Jul 2012 #31
There's an attitude in the South Spitfire of ATJ Jul 2012 #12
Kinda like that episode of MASH LynneSin Jul 2012 #17
I remember that one. Spitfire of ATJ Jul 2012 #21
Absolutely! AngryOldDem Jul 2012 #14
All true but irrelevent hack89 Jul 2012 #19
Yep, K & R. nt mother earth Jul 2012 #24
But "these assholes always get away" nt Incitatus Jul 2012 #36
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»It's this simple - George...»Reply #20