Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

Hoyt

(54,770 posts)
53. That's a serious oversight. I think there is some complacency by Democrats. In fact, Trump got
Wed Jun 21, 2017, 04:45 PM
Jun 2017

a number of Hispanic (likely 30%) and Asian votes. And I think 7% of Blacks voted for him despite his history of discrimination. That's something that needs to be addressed.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Low turnout is common in special elections Gothmog Jun 2017 #1
Yes, I know that. But, what if we could fix that? MineralMan Jun 2017 #4
I don't think you are Phoenix61 Jun 2017 #14
Turnout was 57.97% in GA 6 Cattledog Jun 2017 #33
Thank you. I have corrected the original post. MineralMan Jun 2017 #34
There was an organization that helped with turnout year-round NewJeffCT Jun 2017 #52
That's the reason we lost, not vote tampering, suppression or anything else. We did not GOTV. Hoyt Jun 2017 #2
Hacking voter rolls can't suppress voter turnout totals?!?!? YCHDT Jun 2017 #5
Do you have any evidence people showed up at polls and were told they weren't registered? Otherwise Hoyt Jun 2017 #12
That will take some time to gather like it did in Florida 2000 where 20,00 votes were purged now ... YCHDT Jun 2017 #41
If there names were removed from the rolls, and they showed up to vote, there should have been a lot Hoyt Jun 2017 #45
People weren't in 2000, that's not how humans act when they're disenfranchised to vote ... most will YCHDT Jun 2017 #47
If I had been turned away in 2000, next time, I would check my registration at the very last minute Hoyt Jun 2017 #49
For Florida you're right but that kind of mass purging doesn't happen everywhere and now they YCHDT Jun 2017 #50
I agree it is harder for non-whites to vote in some areas, especially with photo ID, only Hoyt Jun 2017 #51
That's the thing everything being equal they don't have to make it really hard just slightly harder YCHDT Jun 2017 #55
I'm afraid it's going to have to get a whole lot worse. kacekwl Jun 2017 #60
There was a HUGE GOTV effort. They were contacted. They CHOSE not to come out. LBM20 Jun 2017 #6
Yes. They chose. They always choose. MineralMan Jun 2017 #10
Where I live its mostly minority voters and I've never seen a door knock from the DNC where as ... YCHDT Jun 2017 #48
That's a serious oversight. I think there is some complacency by Democrats. In fact, Trump got Hoyt Jun 2017 #53
That's incredibly sad! MineralMan Jun 2017 #61
Yes. I'm afraid you're right. MineralMan Jun 2017 #7
The numbers in your original post put it in perspective. If we had gotten 3% of so of Democrats who Hoyt Jun 2017 #15
It's almost impossible to convince a lot of people of that, though. MineralMan Jun 2017 #17
Agree completely. Hoyt Jun 2017 #19
Well, you know... it was raining.... nt femmocrat Jun 2017 #3
I doubt that mattered, really. MineralMan Jun 2017 #8
I know.. I was being snarky. femmocrat Jun 2017 #11
They had 4 weeks of early voting, 6 weeks of mail in ballots -- why wait until the last day? Hoyt Jun 2017 #16
If Liberals Voted ... DonViejo Jun 2017 #9
NO..the Democratic Party needs to be the party to make BlackCherokee Jun 2017 #13
How are votes "suppressed" if 50% of REGISTERED Democrats didn't even show up at polls? Hoyt Jun 2017 #18
No, it is happening,, it happened to me when I voted in Durham, BlackCherokee Jun 2017 #23
You showed up at a polling place where you had voted in the prior two years, and were turned away? Hoyt Jun 2017 #24
You are not informed because it happened in NC and i was actually on the news after my vote BlackCherokee Jun 2017 #42
But, see, I will tell you to go out and vote. MineralMan Jun 2017 #25
People are starting to think that candidates are selected and not elected and that is why there is BlackCherokee Jun 2017 #43
That's sad. 40%?? awesomerwb1 Jun 2017 #20
You have to motivate people with SPECIFIC examples of how it will make their lives better Lee-Lee Jun 2017 #21
And yet, Trump won with glittering generalities and MineralMan Jun 2017 #27
When a Democrat hasn't won that district since before 1978... yallerdawg Jun 2017 #22
This country is cut into 1/3s Cosmocat Jun 2017 #26
Yes, and it's up to our 1/3 to go convince that other 1/3 MineralMan Jun 2017 #29
There's a whole list of things we can do Danascot Jun 2017 #28
I suggest we start with that 60% of actual registered MineralMan Jun 2017 #30
You left out the #1 thing to do. rgbecker Jun 2017 #31
Sorry but not true. Turnout was 57.97% Cattledog Jun 2017 #32
Thanks for your updated information. MineralMan Jun 2017 #35
I do not get this. I read earlier low turn out was 40% when we thought that was the number. pirateshipdude Jun 2017 #36
Turnout in Minnesota was below that in 2014 and 2010. former9thward Jun 2017 #37
I got the wrong numbers. I've fixed it. MineralMan Jun 2017 #39
Part of the problem is young voters. octoberlib Jun 2017 #38
Well, I always did when I was young. MineralMan Jun 2017 #40
If you are in a gerrymandered district where one party has DeminPennswoods Jun 2017 #44
Well, if 10,000 Democrats who sat home last night had voted, we would have won. Hoyt Jun 2017 #46
This is exactly the mindset of many minority voters here in tne South. BlackCherokee Jun 2017 #54
Yep YCHDT Jun 2017 #56
For the presidential election of 2016 NewJeffCT Jun 2017 #57
In WA and Oregon more than 70% turn out -- because of mail-in voting. pnwmom Jun 2017 #58
I completely agree! MineralMan Jun 2017 #59
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Voter Turnout in GA-06 wa...»Reply #53