Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Daalalou

(54 posts)
37. Trayvon didn't beat the crap out of Zimmerman
Mon Jul 9, 2012, 11:35 PM
Jul 2012

Nor did he pummel him. From the very beginning, what never made sense to me was Zimmerman's claim that he was badly beaten by Trayvon and had no choice but to shoot, but didn't go to a hospital that night.

As more evidence has come out, it's become clearer that a "beating" or "pummeling" never happened:

1) The only injury to Trayvon's hands was a single 1/4" abrasion on one finger. He also had none of Zimmerman's blood or DNA on his hands.
2) Zimmerman's head injuries, as his own doctor reported, were superficial and there was no head trauma.
3)His doctor said that his nose was likely broken, but it was a minor break, and no X-rays were taken.
4) The witness who said Trayvon was punching Zimmerman MMA style has recanted that testimony.

It sounds like, at most, that Trayvon hit him once in the nose. The rest of their scuffle until the gunshot was fired was probably them grappling with each other.

And furthermore, we have only Zimmerman's less-than-trustworthy word that Trayvon attacked. It's true that Trayvon had no wounds that indicate Zimmerman hit him, but that doesn't mean Zimmerman didn't initiate physical contact. He could have grabbed Trayvon, pulled his weapon, pushed him, or cornered him--all actions that might make Trayvon think his only option was to hit the guy to save himself.

Can that be proven? I don't know. But again, the only evidence otherwise is the word of Zimmerman, who has shown himself to be a liar multiple times.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

I haven't commented on this very sad episode but this is 100% correct: Zimmerman was stalking byeya Jul 2012 #1
Yes, stalking is following in a theatening manner. HooptieWagon Jul 2012 #2
Zman then chased him with a gun uponit7771 Jul 2012 #3
If I thought a man was chasing me with a gun LynneSin Jul 2012 #5
Are you of the school that Zimmerman was brandishing the weapon while walking? slackmaster Jul 2012 #10
Doesn't matter whether Martin saw a weapon or not. GoneOffShore Jul 2012 #32
This case is all about common sense. Everything that happened after Zimmerman pacalo Jul 2012 #4
I still have not had my question answered: Zimmerman said louis-t Jul 2012 #6
Here is a good summary, WP blog... uppityperson Jul 2012 #7
It sounds like this is the direction the lead prosecutor is taking. Baitball Blogger Jul 2012 #8
The defense will admit that Zimmerman was following Travon, but lost sight of him and broke off... slackmaster Jul 2012 #9
Are you of the school that Trayvon came out of the shadows and attacked Zimmerman? uppityperson Jul 2012 #28
No. I believe the defense will claim an interval of disengagement... slackmaster Jul 2012 #33
Which do you believe? uppityperson Jul 2012 #34
I believe Zimmerman is morally responsible for a needless death because he started the confrontation slackmaster Jul 2012 #38
thank you uppityperson Jul 2012 #39
Trayvon's actions would be a clear abuse of SYG hfojvt Jul 2012 #11
The follower was the guy with the fucking GUN! DevonRex Jul 2012 #13
How did he know that Zimmerman had a gun? slackmaster Jul 2012 #15
usually you defend yourself from a gun hfojvt Jul 2012 #18
Trayvon didn't beat the crap out of Zimmerman Daalalou Jul 2012 #37
AND why do you correlate Trayvon to the robbers? DevonRex Jul 2012 #16
for a couple of reasons - anecdotally hfojvt Jul 2012 #20
That is totally fucked-up reasoning, man. It makes NO sense. Nt DevonRex Jul 2012 #22
"perhaps Trayvon could have just answered a few questions"... ljm2002 Jul 2012 #27
"Martin" is Trayvon. Do you mean Zimmerman? uppityperson Jul 2012 #29
Oops! I will correct it, thx. n/t ljm2002 Jul 2012 #35
Trying to help? NO! Self appointed wannabe. Neighbourhood Watch... TheMadMonk Jul 2012 #40
Wow that's a rather bizarre mental process on display... ljm2002 Jul 2012 #23
The reasoning got worse, too. I'm speechless. Nt DevonRex Jul 2012 #25
Trayvon Martin. George Zimmerman. uppityperson Jul 2012 #30
Your TRUNK was robbed of tennis balls and you want the person SHOT??? DevonRex Jul 2012 #26
I'd rather not live in a society where someone is shot for taking a couple tennis balls. Good grief. uppityperson Jul 2012 #31
There's an attitude in the South Spitfire of ATJ Jul 2012 #12
Kinda like that episode of MASH LynneSin Jul 2012 #17
I remember that one. Spitfire of ATJ Jul 2012 #21
Absolutely! AngryOldDem Jul 2012 #14
All true but irrelevent hack89 Jul 2012 #19
Yep, K & R. nt mother earth Jul 2012 #24
But "these assholes always get away" nt Incitatus Jul 2012 #36
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»It's this simple - George...»Reply #37