Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

B2G

(9,766 posts)

5. I get that part, but

Reply to Demsrule86 (Reply #4)

Thu Jun 22, 2017, 03:57 PM

Jun 2017

I'm really wondering how they came up with 81,000. That's just under half of all nurses in the state.

Wasn't there a severe nursing shortage prior to the ACA?

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

15 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

81,000 nurses in Ohio will lose jobs. [View all] Cattledog Jun 2017 OP

*Lose, ahem (in the thread title) True Dough Jun 2017 #1

Well underpants Jun 2017 #2

Just curious, what are these figures based on? nt B2G Jun 2017 #3

The fact that no one can afford Trump care and which is why they removed the mandate...so Demsrule86 Jun 2017 #4

I get that part, but B2G Jun 2017 #5

Elections have consequences Drahthaardogs Jun 2017 #6

Half the nurses in the state? Lee-Lee Jun 2017 #7

Seems just a tich high. B2G Jun 2017 #8

Agreed Lee-Lee Jun 2017 #9

I wonder how many of those 81,000 standingtall Jun 2017 #10

I bet it is less than the percentage of that state. Ilsa Jun 2017 #13

... NutmegYankee Jun 2017 #11

Maybe there is a plan to get them coal jobs JDC Jun 2017 #12

Nursing homes, rural hospitals and clinics, Ilsa Jun 2017 #14

please correct to the word LOSE in your subject line Skittles Jun 2017 #15