Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: College defends firing professor after Fox News appearance [View all]petronius
(26,696 posts)3. I'll bet that the vast majority (even all) of that "feedback from ... prospective students
and their families" was complete bullshit - RW trolls organized at some website or other claiming a connection to the college.
As for her comments, while I don't think she was a particularly effective communicator in that interview, they are a ridiculous thing to even complain about, let alone for the college to take action. Seems like another example of a chickenshit administration mistreating one of the most vulnerable segments of the academic community (adjunct lecturers)...
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
46 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
+1. It is very different when one group has been treated like dirt by a significant portion of
Hoyt
Jun 2017
#11
Nope, you can't substitute the discriminated against group for the privileged one. It's not the same
stevenleser
Jun 2017
#23
I'll bet that the vast majority (even all) of that "feedback from ... prospective students
petronius
Jun 2017
#3
Her comments were not appropriate and showed a dislike of some of her students...to say the least
Demsrule86
Jun 2017
#36
No, I said learning...not corrupting influences..why would the professor go on Fox news
Demsrule86
Jun 2017
#40
It's possible it was a paid appearance. The question mark is there for a reason. n/t
rzemanfl
Jun 2017
#27
A smart young black woman, I'd bet FOX and Nuts may not be the worse she's encountered. nt
fleabiscuit
Jun 2017
#19
I thought "racist" was a given with Faux. So, correction-"racist stereotype." K? n/t
rzemanfl
Jun 2017
#31
She thought academic freedom would protect her. Failing that, since she worked for a public
stevenleser
Jun 2017
#24
An appearance on a TV show which will be used to hurt the BLM movement in fact has nothing to do
Demsrule86
Jun 2017
#41