Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Cory Booker Will "Pause" Fundraising From Big Pharma Becaue It "Arouses So Much Criticism" [View all]Trial_By_Fire
(624 posts)86. Here is more information for you....
http://www.latimes.com/opinion/op-ed/la-oe-1027-mazzucato-big-pharma-prices-20151027-story.html
"Since the 1930s, the National Institutes of Health has invested close to $900 billion in the basic and applied research that formed both the pharmaceutical and biotechnology sectors, with private companies only getting seriously into the biotech game in the 1980s.
Big Pharma, while of course contributing to innovation, has increasingly decommitted itself from the high-risk side of research and development, often letting small biotech companies and the NIH do most of the hard work. Indeed, roughly 75% of so-called new molecular entities with priority rating (the most innovative drugs) trace their existence to NIH funding, while companies spend more on "me too" drugs (slight variations of existing ones.)"
<more at link above>
---------------------
http://www.sciencemag.org/news/2017/03/data-check-us-government-share-basic-research-funding-falls-below-50
"For the first time in the postWorld War II era, the federal government no longer funds a majority of the basic research carried out in the United States. Data from ongoing surveys by the National Science Foundation (NSF) show that federal agencies provided only 44% of the $86 billion spent on basic research in 2015. The federal share, which topped 70% throughout the 1960s and 70s, stood at 61% as recently as 2004 before falling below 50% in 2013.
The sharp drop in recent years is the result of two contrasting trendsa flattening of federal spending on basic research over the past decade and a significant rise in corporate funding of fundamental science since 2012. The first is a familiar story to most academic scientists, who face stiffening competition for federal grants.
But the second trend will probably surprise them. It certainly flies in the face of conventional wisdom, which paints U.S. companies as so focused on short-term profits that they have all but abandoned the pursuit of fundamental knowledge, an endeavor that may take decades to pay off. (This month, for example, Duke Universitys Center for Innovation Policy will hold a conference entitled The Decline in Corporate Research: Should We Worry?)"
<more at link above>
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
89 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Cory Booker Will "Pause" Fundraising From Big Pharma Becaue It "Arouses So Much Criticism" [View all]
HarmonyRockets
Jun 2017
OP
Exactly. Corporatist? No money from anyone who works at a corporation. Eom
pirateshipdude
Jun 2017
#7
We cannot just pick and chose what manufactured outrage we want to rain on our Democrats. Eom
pirateshipdude
Jun 2017
#53
I'm a social worker and we give money and even have a lobbyist. We work with the poor, mentally
kerry-is-my-prez
Jul 2017
#82
I do not get what you are saying. I work Health Insurance. Do I get to donate to our Democarts? Eom
pirateshipdude
Jul 2017
#83
On the other hand he can push for small donations of less than $50 and not have to itemize....
George II
Jun 2017
#20
The Intercept? Isn't that a blatantly anti-Democratic site that lambasted Obama....
George II
Jun 2017
#11
I happened to be in Canada two weeks ago visiting family. All over the news were reports of....
George II
Jun 2017
#28
Good idea. One reason drugs are so expensive is the entire HC system is expensive.
Hoyt
Jun 2017
#31
Remember that government first and foremost is 'of, by, for The People'...
Trial_By_Fire
Jun 2017
#34
I like bottom line. 5. Then lets deal with the issue and not Booker getting donation from people he
pirateshipdude
Jul 2017
#78
Money in Politics is another issue, another conversation. Booker receiving money from
pirateshipdude
Jul 2017
#81
The pharmaceutical industry is one of the most regulated industries of all in the US...
George II
Jul 2017
#85
Perhaps you could provide a list of the industries Democrats are allowed to work in?
BainsBane
Jun 2017
#37
Didn't he say it is the "perception"? So no, he really isn't saying there is an issue with accepting
pirateshipdude
Jun 2017
#44
The operative term is "WORK FOR..." The guy that empties the waste baskets at Merck....
George II
Jun 2017
#47
That whole purity thing will be the death of us all. One side or the other. Eom
pirateshipdude
Jun 2017
#54