Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Never understood why we stopped in the first place. Laffy Kat Jul 2017 #1
Because the Reeps got in power .. ananda Jul 2017 #16
Exactly. Amaryllis Jul 2017 #19
Yep. HAVA was a scam. nt Susan Calvin Jul 2017 #37
Message auto-removed Name removed Jul 2017 #60
because democrats ignore rw radio and they continued the "hanging chad" success certainot Jul 2017 #21
Really simple. SCVDem Jul 2017 #33
Yup. If they won't even look at them in the states they are sure were hacked into, we don't want to shraby Jul 2017 #2
There is a reason most EU countries don't allow electronic voting dalton99a Jul 2017 #3
Long past time Hekate Jul 2017 #4
When I was a kid, I watched my parents vote on a giant mechanical machine unblock Jul 2017 #5
My first vote cast for President Carter was on one of those machines. That's were the Purveyor Jul 2017 #10
Read an article about how the lever machines were rigged in the early years. Jim Beard Jul 2017 #36
I think if we could get a powerful group like League of Women Voters and AARP to start making noise. CurtEastPoint Jul 2017 #6
Thanks Kurt saidsimplesimon Jul 2017 #15
wash state has them.. we mail them in as well. no polling places... samnsara Jul 2017 #7
This system should go nationwide but it is up to the individual States to set their own Purveyor Jul 2017 #11
Oregon too. It rocks. R's hate it because it makes it MUCH easier for people to vote. flibbitygiblets Jul 2017 #44
Oregon ballots are counted electronically. former9thward Jul 2017 #58
Actually I did. They also verify signatures, and in case of audit there's a paper trail. flibbitygiblets Jul 2017 #66
It is clearly time for a change of direction. UCmeNdc Jul 2017 #8
Yes absolutely FakeNoose Jul 2017 #9
We need to repeat, over and over: "ALL elections must be with paper ballots and MUST be audited" JoeOtterbein Jul 2017 #12
Screw the MSM, each one trying to be the first to call the elections. oasis Jul 2017 #13
We could have paper ballots with preliminary results from optical scans csziggy Jul 2017 #22
Excellent point(s). oasis Jul 2017 #57
And hand-counting . . . OldRedneck Jul 2017 #34
For how ever long it takes. nt oasis Jul 2017 #59
+1 TexasBushwhacker Jul 2017 #54
Electronic Machines are saidsimplesimon Jul 2017 #14
Yes! If California leads the way other states will quickly follow. McCamy Taylor Jul 2017 #17
not in my precinct bluecollar2 Jul 2017 #41
Machines are not the problem it is the lack of voters. CK_John Jul 2017 #18
The lack of voters may be partially a result of unreliable voting machines csziggy Jul 2017 #23
It's BEEN time, for YEARS, but elleng Jul 2017 #20
Yes, Yes, Yes blue-wave Jul 2017 #24
No no no Egnever Jul 2017 #31
They would then move on to some other conspiracy theory mythology Jul 2017 #47
Paper Ballots Campaign Lonestarblue Jul 2017 #25
No just no Egnever Jul 2017 #29
Do you even know how your state counts votes? OldRedneck Jul 2017 #32
Yes, I do. Lonestarblue Jul 2017 #46
My county used paper ballots that are scanned and stored. Blue_true Jul 2017 #26
I vote is not valid unless it can be recounted. A paper ballot would assure it could be recounted. The Wielding Truth Jul 2017 #27
Fuck that Egnever Jul 2017 #28
How will we count paper ballots? OldRedneck Jul 2017 #30
Thank you! Egnever Jul 2017 #35
Paper receipt + digital count Nasruddin Jul 2017 #38
paper receipts are worthless. they will never see the light of day 99.999% of the time. nt TheFrenchRazor Jul 2017 #40
The only time they would be needed is if there is some suspicion of vote fraud. Egnever Jul 2017 #53
"suspicion" doesn't get you a state-wide hand/eye recount, does it? explain how you would obtain a TheFrenchRazor Jul 2017 #61
No basis in fact? Egnever Jul 2017 #64
Are the votes tallied at each precinct? retread Jul 2017 #45
absolutely. all paper ballots, all hand counted. nt TheFrenchRazor Jul 2017 #39
Repulsives tiptonic Jul 2017 #42
Need to find a place to lay a bet. THE bet. boat-tail Jul 2017 #43
I agree. But you do understand that states run elections and we have no power to Demsrule86 Jul 2017 #48
The electronic voting machine experiment was an epic fail. Initech Jul 2017 #49
would it be possible to do something like thinkingagain Jul 2017 #50
Paper ballots are verifiable liberal N proud Jul 2017 #51
Or you can have machines like we do in Nevada Egnever Jul 2017 #52
Had those in Ohio liberal N proud Jul 2017 #55
not here Egnever Jul 2017 #56
how can you prove that the "official" result accurately reflects the paper receipts? you can't, beca TheFrenchRazor Jul 2017 #62
Sounds pretty easy to fix Egnever Jul 2017 #63
i'm guessing a good hacker could easily deal with the audit function; there has to be some code that TheFrenchRazor Jul 2017 #67
+1000! colsohlibgal Jul 2017 #65
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»It's time to go back to p...»Reply #45