Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

NashuaDW

(90 posts)
12. Misleading terms ....
Tue Jul 10, 2012, 09:04 PM
Jul 2012

Your use of "effective tax rate" merges the tax rates between salary and dividends.

If Gov Romney (or anyone else) had all of his income from salary - they would pay a much higher rate.

Gov Romney, Mr Buffet, Mr Gates all receive the bulk of their income from dividends -- taxed at a much lower rate.

The argument is that dividends (generated by investment of already taxed salary) are taxed at a lower rate to encourage investment.

If, at the end of the month, I have $700 left ($1000 before taxes) I can invest it (put it at risk) and if my investment pays off .... I get a tax break on the rewards of my investment.

Doing an apples to oranges comparison clouds the water.

Let's simplify the tax code and decide how we want to tax and what rate.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Rich Obama fundraiser say...»Reply #12